Transition state barrier heights

Transition state barrier height for the unimolecular dissociation reaction of formaldehyde H2CO H2 CO [35]. This reaction is Woodward-Hoffmann... 

Table 20.2 Transition state barrier height for the reaction H2CO — H2 + CO...

Transition State Barrier Heights Using ccCA... 

Here, coR is the frequency of motion in the reactant well, and Eb is the height of the transition-state barrier. Xr is the effective barrier frequency with which the reactant molecule passes, by diffusive Brownian motions through the barrier region and is given by the following self-consistent relation... 

Figure A7.1 The effect of an enzyme on the minimum energy pathway of a simple enzyme catalysed reaction involving a single substrate. (TS = transition state.) The heights of the energy barriers TSi, ts2 and ts3 will vary depending on which step in the enzyme controlled route is the rate controlling step...

Figure 8. Calculated two-dimensional energy surfaces for heterogeneous non-Franck-Condon transition between H9OT.H2O + e and 5H2O at equal potential energies, before correction for ground states. Barrier height +6.15kT (+15.2 kJ/mole, +0.16 eV) after correction for ground state energies.

Concerning the 77 dependence of the rate constant of solution reactions, most often investigated experimentally is photoinduced EJZ (trans/cis) isomerization of stilbenes. The isomerization takes place by surmounting over a transition-state barrier on the excited-state potential surface. The reaction is very fast with a rate constant on the order of 10 s- due to a small height (of about 15 kj/mol) of the barrier. The rate constant observed in solvents decreases as 77 increases. To be more exact, however, k often decreases more slowly than 77 , describable by a fractional-power dependence on r/ as kgf, 77- with 0 < a < 1. Therefore, the 77 dependence of k ), deviates from that expected from the Kramers theory. 

In order for the reaction to take place with the mechanism in the Grote-Hynes theory as well as in the Kramers theory, the reactant must surmount over the transition-state barrier only by diffusional Brownian motions regulated by solvent fluctuations. In the two-step mechanism of the Sumi-Marcus model, on the other hand, surmounting over the transition-state barrier is accomplished as a result of sequential two steps. That is, the barrier is climbed first by diffusional Brownian motions only up to intermediate heights, from which much faster intramolecular vibrational motions take the reactant to the transition state located at the top of the barrier. 

It is apparent, therefore, that differences between these two mechanisms manifest themselves most drastically when the transition-state barrier is much higher than the thermal energy kgT which is about 2.5 kJ/mol for T s 300 K. In this res t, isomerization of substituted azobenzenes and Al-benzylideneanilines with a barrier height of about 50 kJ/mol on the Sq surface is more interesting than photoisomerization of stilbenes with a barrier height of only about 15 kJ/mol on the Si surface, if we can cast the former into solvent-fluctuation controlled under pressure. 

B. C. Garrett and D. G. Truhlar, WKB approximation for the reaction-path Hamiltonian Application to variational transition state theory, vibrationally adiabatic excited-state barrier heights, and resonance calculations,/. Chem. Phys. 81 309 (1984). 

The transition from k to on the low-pressure side ean be eonstnieted using iiiidtidimensional unimoleeular rate theory [1, 44], if one knows the barrier height for the reaetion and the vibrational frequeneies of the reaetant and transition state. The transition from to k y ean be deseribed in temis of Kramers theory [45]... 

For 5=1, the normal transition state theory rate constant is independent of temperature at high temperatures and varies exponentially with temperature in the limit of low temperatures kT small compared with the barrier height U ) as... 

Quantum-chemical calculations of PES for carbonic acid dimers [Meier et al. 1982] have shown that at fixed heavy-atom coordinates the barrier is higher than 30kcal/mol, and distance between O atoms is 2.61-2.71 A. Stretching skeleton vibrations reduce this distance in the transition state to 2.45-2.35 A, when the barrier height becomes less than 3 kcal/mol. Meier et al. [1982] have stressed that the transfer is possible only due to the skeleton deformation, which shortens the distances for the hydrogen atom tunneling from 0.6-0.7 A to 0.3 A. The effective tunneling mass exceeds 2mn-... 

Let us consider cases 1-3 in Fig. 4.4. In case 1, AG s for formation of the competing transition states A and B from the reactant R are much less than AG s for formation of A and B from A and B, respectively. If the latter two AG s are sufficiently large that the competitively formed products B and A do not return to R, the ratio of the products A and B at the end of the reaction will not depend on their relative stabilities, but only on their relative rates of formation. The formation of A and B is effectively irreversible in these circumstances. The reaction energy plot in case 1 corresponds to this situation and represents a case of kinetic control. The relative amounts of products A and B will depend on the heights of the activation barriers AG and G, not the relative stability of products A and B. 

The next level seeks a molecular description, and kinetics again makes a contribution. As will be seen in Chapter 5, the experimental kinetics provides information on both the energetics of the reaction (i.e., the height of the energy barrier on the reaction path) and the atomic composition of the transition state. Any proposed mechanism must therefore be consistent with the kinetic evidence. 

The reader may now recall the discussion in Section 5.3, Position and Height of the Energy Barrier, on correlations of rates and equilibria of the same reactions and the interpretation of the slope a from such LEER as a measure of the position of the transition state along the reaction coordinate. It will now be apparent why the term Breasted coefficient is applied both to this quantity and also to the slope of LEER according to Eqs. (7-58) and (7-59). The interpretation of a and P from Eqs. (7-58) and (7-59) as measures of fractional progress along a reaction coordinate may be misleading when the reaction is complex, and caution is appropriate. - pp- 38-41... 

Kivelson14 has given a treatment of the distortion by the barrier forces and centrifugal effects. This has been applied phenomenologically to CH3SiH3 (a coaxial symmetric rotor) to fit the set of / = 0 to 1 transitions associated with the first few torsional states. One of the parameters involves the barrier height, which was thereby determined. 

---