Transition state theory general equations

Finally, the generalization of the partition function q m transition state theory (equation (A3.4.96)) is given by... 

These equations lead to fomis for the thermal rate constants that are perfectly similar to transition state theory, although the computations of the partition functions are different in detail. As described in figrne A3.4.7 various levels of the theory can be derived by successive approximations in this general state-selected fomr of the transition state theory in the framework of the statistical adiabatic chaimel model. We refer to the literature cited in the diagram for details. 

Poliak E 1990 Variational transition state theory for activated rate processes J. Chem. Phys. 93 1116 Poliak E 1991 Variational transition state theory for reactions in condensed phases J. Phys. Chem. 95 533 Frishman A and Poliak E 1992 Canonical variational transition state theory for dissipative systems application to generalized Langevin equations J. Chem. Phys. 96 8877... 

Holroyd (1977) finds that generally the attachment reactions are very fast (fej - 1012-1013 M 1s 1), are relatively insensitive to temperature, and increase with electron mobility. The detachment reactions are sensitive to temperature and the nature of the liquid. Fitted to the Arrhenius equation, these reactions show very large preexponential factors, which allow the endothermic detachment reactions to occur despite high activation energy. Interpreted in terms of the transition state theory and taking the collision frequency as 1013 s 1- these preexponential factors give activation entropies 100 to 200 J/(mole.K), depending on the solute and the solvent. 

Second, in deriving Equation 16.2 from transition state theory, it is necessary to assume that the overall reaction proceeds on a molecular scale as a single elementary reaction or a series of elementary reactions (e.g., Lasaga, 1984 Nagy et al., 1991). In general, the elementary reactions that occur as a mineral dissolves and precipitates are not known. Thus, even though the form of Equation 16.2 is convenient and broadly applicable for explaining experimental results, it is not necessarily correct in the strictest sense. 

The idea in Kramers theory is to describe the motion in the reaction coordinate as that of a one-dimensional Brownian particle and in that way include the effects of the solvent on the rate constants. Above we have seen how the probability density for the velocity of a Brownian particle satisfies the Fokker-Planck equation that must be solved. Before we do that, it will be useful to generalize the equation slightly to include two variables explicitly, namely both the coordinate r and the velocity v, since both are needed in order to determine the rate constant in transition-state theory. 

It is the general shortcoming of pseudo-thermodynamic equations derived from transition-state theory that thermodynamic quantities relating to the transition state cannot be measured independently of the kinetic phenomena. The further development of equations (44) to (45) follows different lines. 

This relation emphasizes that only part of the double-layer correction upon AG arises from the formation of the precursor state [eqn. (4a)]. Since the charges of the reactant and product generally differ, normally wp = ws and so, from eqn. (9) the work-corrected activation energy, AG orr, will differ from AG. [This arises because, according to transition-state theory, the influence of the double layer upon AG equals the work required to transport the transition state, rather than the reactant, from the bulk solution to the reaction site (see Sect. 3.5.2).] Equation (9) therefore expresses the effect of the double layer upon the elementary electron-transfer step, whereas eqn. (4a) accounts for the work of forming the precursor state from the bulk reactant. These two components of the double-layer correction are given together in eqn. (7a). 

The factor introduces into equation (9) an explicit dependence of m on the concentration of species 1 in the gas adjacent to the interface [see equation (B-78)]. Except for this difference, equation (9) contains the same kinds of parameters as does equation (6), since the coefficient a can be analyzed from the viewpoint of transition-state theory. Although a may depend in general on and the pressure and composition of the gas at the interface, a reasonable hypothesis, which enables us to express a in terms of kinetic parameters already introduced and thermodynamic properties of species 1, is that a is independent of the pressure and composition of the gas [a = a(7])]. Under this condition, at constant 7] the last term in equation (9) is proportional to the concentration j and the first term on the right-hand side of equation (9) is independent of. Therefore, by increasing the concentration (or partial pressure) of species 1 in the gas, the surface equilibrium condition for species 1—m = 0—can be reached. If Pi e(T denotes the equilibrium partial pressure of species 1 at temperature 7], then when m = 0, equation (9) reduces to... 

This is the general equation of transition-state theory in its thermodynamic form. 

Here is the forward rate constant, aj is the activity of species j in the rate-determining reaction, mj and are constants, and R and T are the gas constant and absolute temperature, respectively. The sign of the rate indicates whether the reaction goes forward or backward. The relationship of this equation to transition state theory and irreversible kinetics has been discussed in the literature (Lasaga, 1995 Alekseyev et al., 1997 Lichtner, 1998 Oelkers, 2001b). The use of this equation with = 1 is generally associated with a composite reaction in which all the elementary reactions are near equilibrium except for one step which is ratedetermining. This step must be shared by both dissolution and precipitation. 

A recent account of transition state theory (TST) has been given in [31] (see also [30]). Here we shall content ourselves with briefly summarizing TST (by which we mean the modern version of the theory which accounts for dynamical corrections) and contrasting it with the present approach. The main result of TST is an expression for the reaction rate this expression is equivalent to (42) but different from it and less general (it only applies to specific cases of (19), such as the Langevin equation (21), and only with specific dividing surfaces). 

The transition state is located at the top of the barrier along the path Of decomposition. Thus the transition state lies in a trough and in general will be stable along all degrees of freedom except along the path of decomposition. The transition state theory leads to the following well-known expression for the rate equation constant k,... 

The authors proceed to calculate the reaction rates by the flux correlation method. They find that the molecular dynamics results are well described by the Grote-Hynes theory [221] of activated reactions in solutions, which is based on the generalized Langevin equation, but that the simpler Kramers model [222] is inadequate and overestimates the solvent effect. Quite expectedly, the observed deviations from transition state theory increase with increasing values of T. 

In the previous section we demonstrated how variational transition state theory may be usefully applied to systems described by a space- and time-dependent generalized Lan-gevin equation. The harmonic nature of the bath implicit in the STGLE led to a compact analytical expression for the optimized planar dividing surface result. Except for very low temperatures, most reactive systems cannot be described in terms of a harmonic bath. In this section we demonstrate how the VTST formalism may be applied to general condensed phase reactive systems. For a recent review, see Ref. 80. 

It is generally assumed that the kinetics of each elementary step can be treated by transition state theory, as described in all textbooks. The stoichiometric number a, of an elementary step in the cycle is the number of times that the step must occur for the cycle to turn over once, as corresponding to its stoichiometric equation. 

---