Transition metals elements geometry

The first-row transition metal elements, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Co, comprise a small number of monomeric structures. The only structural report based on Cr is [Cr(bdt)2]2- (Table IIA, Entry 18). The geometry is distorted tetrahedral (A = 83.9°). The Cr— S bond length of 2.364 A is rather long, the ninth longest of all metal bis(dithiolene) structures. 

Figure 3 Isomeric possibilities for structures for E Mx-n, n = (x — 1) — l,x = 4-6. Only the geometry of highest total vertex connectivity (usually denoted as closo but note the ambiguity for x = 4) and that of next highest (usually denoted as nido) are shown for economy of space. Likewise, only the binary E and M clusters are enumerated. Clearly, many more structures are possible if more open structures are allowed or more than one type of main group or transition metal element is used in the compound...

A few semiempirical approaches are currently available that may allow treatment of transition metals with efficiency. Two of these fall in the INDO class of HF models. (INDO methods are usually more computationally efficient, though not as accurate, as those based on NDDO theories.) INDO/S developed by Zemer et al. is included in the ZINDO package and has been available for a number of years. It is very successful for the prediction of electronic spectra, for which it was carefully parameterized. However, INDO/S is not usually applied to compute more general properties such as optimized geometries or molecular energies, as it is not deemed to be reliable for these values. SINDOI from Jug et al. has recently been expanded to some transition metal elements and performs as expected within the limited INDO theory used. Again, results are somewhat erratic and the method does not appear to treat open-shell systems with a great deal of success. 

Main-group elements X such as monovalent F, divalent O, and trivalent N are expected to form families of transition-metal compounds MX (M—F fluorides, M=0 oxides, M=N nitrides) that are analogous to the corresponding p-block compounds. In this section we wish to compare the geometries and NBO descriptors of transition-metal halides, oxides, and nitrides briefly with the isovalent hydrocarbon species (that is, we compare fluorides with hydrides or alkyls, oxides with alkylidenes, and nitrides with alkylidynes). However, these substitutions also bring in other important electronic variations whose effects will now be considered. 

Even though qualitative bonding descriptions of metal atom clusters up to six or seven atoms can be derived and in some cases correlated with structural detail, it is clear that most structures observed for higher clusters cannot be treated thus. Nor do the structures observed correlate with those observed for borane derivatives with the same number of vertices. Much of borane chemistry is dominated by the tendency to form structures derived from the icosahedron found in elemental boron. However, elemental transition metals possess either a close-packed or body-centered cubic arrangement. In this connection, one can find the vast majority of metal polyhedra in carbonyl cluster compounds within close-packed geometries, particularly hexagonal close-packing. 

---