Transition-limited regime

The transition-limited regime or the propagation regime, when positron motion can be described as Bloch wave propagation. Positron trapping in monovacancies is an example of the transition-limited regime [101]. 

In practical situations any intermediate case is possible. In the case of the transition-limited regime, the link between positron states in the specimen and the experimental positron lifetime spectrum is provided by the simple trapping model (STM) [103]. Let m t) denote the probability that positron will be present in the specimen at time t. In the case of an ideal crystal i.e., if no defect is present in the specimen), positrons will be delocalised in the material. The time when positron thermalisa-tion is accomplished is chosen as t = 0, so m t = 0) = 1. The probability m t) decreases exponentially with time ... 

Kij is the rate of positron transition from the i -th state to the j -th state, where a delocalised positron is denoted by i = 0, and a positron trapped by the k- h defect by i = k. It should be pointed out that restricting ourselves only to the transition-limited regime implies that the transition rates have no spatial dependence. 

This behavior is consistent with the observations of a number of field studies. For example, Jacob et al. (1995) report that in Shenandoah National Park in Virginia (U.S.) in early September, there was a good correlation between 03 and NOz, with a slope of 18 compared to the range of 8.5-14 observed in other studies. In the latter part of September, the correlation was weaker (r2 = 0.23 vs 0.49 earlier) and the slope was only 7. This weakening of the relationship between 03 and NOz was accompanied by a decrease in concentrations of H202 from an average of 0.86 ppb to 0.13 ppb, as expected for a transition from the NOx-limited to the VOC-limited regime. 

From the viewpoint of experimental workers, slow relaxations are abnormally (i.e. unexpected) slow transition processes. The time of a transition process is determined as that of the transition from the initial state to the limit (t -> oo) regime. The limit regime itself can be a steady state, a limit cycle (a self-oscillation process), a strange attractor (stochastic self-oscillation), etc. 

Inevitably, the "limit regime of the process is observed in experiments with finite accuracy. It is possible that the experiment was too short in time, and if the period of this experiment is sufficiently long, the regime would change considerably. Strictly speaking the limit transition f -> oo holds only for a mathematical model. 

Similarly, the achievement of the limit regime (the end of the transition process) is only determined with finite accuracy. This circumstance will be used constantly in what follows. 

Equations 3.15, 3.17 and 3.19 provide the flux relationships in the limiting regimes. There remains the problem of finding the flux relationships in intermediate situations, where the pore size is comparable to the mean free path and the mixture is a multicomponent one. At present, no quantitative kinetic theory exists for flow in the transition region where the dimensions of A and dt are comparable. Therefore different simplified models have been developed. 

The transition between these two limiting regimes occurs roughly where K, as given by equation (65) is of the same order as y/D. Asymptotic analyses give sharper criteria for the transition [207]. Over any limited range of conditions, dr /dt is approximately constant, where 1 < /c < 2. In view of the dependence of D on r/, for large droplets the d- av/ tends to hold for small droplets the rf-square law holds. 

There are some very clear differences in the operation and catalyst requirements of various commercial Resid FCC (RFCC) units. In this paper, the differences between activity-limited and delta-coke-limited RFCC operations are elucidated and the related catalyst performance requirements and catalyst selection methods are discussed. The effect of the catalyst-to-oil ratio on conversion and on catalyst site utilization and poisoning plays a key role in the transition of an RFCC unit from a catalyst-activity-limited regime to a cat-to-oil-limited regime. 

Kramers final coup d etat in this work was a recasting of his rate expressions in terms of the then newly developed transition-state theory [8, 9], which has since become the most prominent rate theory in chemistry. In both limits Kramers was able to cast his result in terms of a multiplicative prefactor to the transition-state theory result. I note that the transition-state method to which Kramers compared takes only the solute degrees of freedom into consideration. Only some 40 years later was it recognized that multidimensional variational-transition-state theory [10], inclusive of all the solvent degrees of freedom, can reproduce the Kramers result in the high-viscosity, spatial-diffusion-limited regime [11-13]. 

---