Transition elements charges

Ernest O. Lawrence, inventor of the cyclotron) This member of the 5f transition elements (actinide series) was discovered in March 1961 by A. Ghiorso, T. Sikkeland, A.E. Larsh, and R.M. Latimer. A 3-Mg californium target, consisting of a mixture of isotopes of mass number 249, 250, 251, and 252, was bombarded with either lOB or IIB. The electrically charged transmutation nuclei recoiled with an atmosphere of helium and were collected on a thin copper conveyor tape which was then moved to place collected atoms in front of a series of solid-state detectors. The isotope of element 103 produced in this way decayed by emitting an 8.6 MeV alpha particle with a half-life of 8 s. 

Ionization energy. As ionization energies go, the values found for the transition elements are neither very high nor very low. They are all rather similar in magnitude. The sequential increase in nuclear charge, which would tend to increase the ionization energy, seems to be almost offset by the extra screening of the nucleus provided by the added electrons. 

As the atomic number increases, so does the positive charge of the nucleus, and the electrons are bound with a higher energy. However, this increase is not linear. For example, the electrons in the d orbital of the third shell have a higher energy than those in the s orbital of the fourth shell, and hence the latter are filled first. The consequence is the unexpected behavior of the first ten transition elements. In the case of the actinides and lanthanides, even more inner orbitals are occupied. Nature is not so simple, but the scheme should help to visualize this complex structure. And if one can assign the electrons of an element, one is a step closer to successfully unraveling the mysteries of the Periodic Table. 

We begin with a presentation of the ideas of the electronic structure of metals. A liquid or solid metal of course consists of positively charged nuclei and electrons. However, since most of the electrons are tightly bound to individual nuclei, one can treat a system of positive ions or ion cores (nuclei plus core electrons) and free electrons, bound to the metal as a whole. In a simple metal, the electrons of the latter type, which are treated explicitly, are the conduction electrons, whose parentage is the valence electrons of the metal atoms all others are considered as part of the cores. In some metals, such as the transition elements, the distinction between core and conduction electrons is not as sharp. 

In the oxygen-deficient region, the predominant ionic defect is the oxygen vacancy, V". The charge neutrality in the solid is maintained by reduction of transition element in B-site to the lower valence state. This can be represented as [13] ... 

The orbitals of the d states in clusters of the 3d, 4d, and 5d transition elements (or in the bulk metals) are fairly localized on the atoms as compared with the sp valence states of comparable energy. Consequently, the d states are not much perturbed by the cluster potential, and the d orbitals of one atom do not strongly overlap with the d orbitals of other atoms. Intraatomic d-d correlations tend to give a fixed integral number of d electrons in each atomic d-shell. However, the small interatomic d-d overlap terms and s-d hybridization induce intraatomic charge fluctuations in each d shell. In fact, a d orbital contribution to the conductivity of the metals and to the low temperature electronic specific heat is obtained only by starting with an extended description of the d electrons.7... 

Electrical conductivity measurements on silicate melts indicate an essentially ionic conductivity of unipolar type (Bockris et al., 1952a,b Bockris and Mellors, 1956 Waffe and Weill, 1975). Charge transfer is operated by cations, whereas anionic groups are essentially stationary. Transference of electronic charges (conductivity of h- and n-types) is observed only in melts enriched in transition elements, where band conduction and electron hopping phenomena are favored. We may thus state that silicate melts, like other fused salts, are ionic liquids. 

Table II I4I, 149-162) consists of a summary of 9-factors, D values and hyperfine coupling constants observed for ions of the first transition series. A molecular orbital (MO) treatment of the metal ion and ligand orbitals has been discussed by Stevens 163) and Owen 164) to account for covalent bonding and resulting hyperfine structure from hgands of transition element ions. Expressions derived for g-factors and hyperfine coupling constants from a MO treatment allow an estimation of the amount of charge transfer of metal electrons to ligand orbitals. Owen 164) has given a MO treatment of Cr +, Ni++ and Cu++ assuming no t bonding.

The higher oxidation states of the transition elements may be considered to be hydrolysis products of hypothetical more highly charged cations in which the central metal ion is sufficiently electronegative to be able to participate in covalent bonding. For example, the hypothetical Mn7 + ion interacts with water to give an oxoanion, the manganate(VII) ion ... 

The variations in ionic radii of the transition elements of the 4th period serve to exemplify the arguments needed to rationalize similar variations in the other transition series. Figure 7.3 includes a plot of the radii of the 2 + ions of those transition elements of the 4th period that form them. The plot includes the radius of the Ca2+ ion, which represents the beginning of the series but has no 3d electrons, as also has the Zn2+ and Ga3+ ions (both 3d10) at the end of the series. The radii are those of octahedrally coordinated ions as they are found in crystalline compounds, the counter-ions (i.e. the ions of opposite charge) being situated at the vertices of an octahedron, as shown in Figure 7.4. 

Of the transition elements, only silver has a water-stable singly charged cation, Ag + (aq). Copper does have a stable + 1 ion in solid compounds, but this disproportionates in aqueous solution ... 

The spin selection rule breaks down somewhat in complexes that exhibit spin-orbit coupling. This behavior is particularly common for complexes of the heavier transition elements with the result that bands associated with formally spin forbidden transitions (generally limited to AS — s ) gain enough intensity to be observed. Table 11.16 summarizes band intensities for various types of electronic transitions, including fully allowed charge transfer absorptions, which will be discussed later in the chapter. 

---