Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transfer Hamiltonian approach

In the perturbative "transfer Hamiltonian approach developed by Bardeen 58), the tip and sample are treated as two non-interacting subsystems. Instead of trying to solve the problem of the combined system, each separate component is described by its wave function, i tip and i/zj, respectively. The tunneling current is then calculated by considering the overlap of these in the tunnel junction. This approach has the advantage that the solutions can be found, for many practical systems, at least approximately, by solution of the stationary Schrodinger equation. [Pg.103]

The authors [33] have elucidated the linear dependence of Ao0 (z-dep) on E for the polyanions by a quantum chemical consideration. A model Hamiltonian approach to the charge transfer (CT) interaction between a polyanion and solvents has been made on the basis of the Mulliken s CT complex theory [34]. [Pg.46]

The third term, Uqt, in Eq. (27) is due to the partial electron transfer between an ion and solvents in its immediate vicinity. The model Hamiltonian approach [33], described in Section V, has shown that Uqt (= AW in Ref. 33) per primary solvent molecule, for an ion such as the polyanion, can also be expressed as a function of E, approximately a quadratic equation ... [Pg.55]

Electron tunneling was first analyzed by Bardeen [12] and Cohen et al. [13] using the perturbative transfer Hamiltonian (TH) approach and more recently by many other authors [14-16]. Although the TH gives, in many cases, a good description of the observed effects, it lacks a firm first principles theoretical basis and does not account properly for many-body effects [17]. An improved form of TH [18] that involved energy dependent transfer matrix elements was used to incorporate many-body effects. However, this model does not describe the electron-phonon interaction properly [19]. [Pg.374]

The approach presented above is referred to as the empirical valence bond (EVB) method (Ref. 6). This approach exploits the simple physical picture of the VB model which allows for a convenient representation of the diagonal matrix elements by classical force fields and convenient incorporation of realistic solvent models in the solute Hamiltonian. A key point about the EVB method is its unique calibration using well-defined experimental information. That is, after evaluating the free-energy surface with the initial parameter a , we can use conveniently the fact that the free energy of the proton transfer reaction is given by... [Pg.58]

From the above discussion, we can see that the purpose of this paper is to present a microscopic model that can analyze the absorption spectra, describe internal conversion, photoinduced ET, and energy transfer in the ps and sub-ps range, and construct the fs time-resolved profiles or spectra, as well as other fs time-resolved experiments. We shall show that in the sub-ps range, the system is best described by the Hamiltonian with various electronic interactions, because when the timescale is ultrashort, all the rate constants lose their meaning. Needless to say, the microscopic approach presented in this paper can be used for other ultrafast phenomena of complicated systems. In particular, we will show how one can prepare a vibronic model based on the adiabatic approximation and show how the spectroscopic properties are mapped onto the resulting model Hamiltonian. We will also show how the resulting model Hamiltonian can be used, with time-resolved spectroscopic data, to obtain internal... [Pg.7]

The fact that there are an infinite number of electronic degrees of freedom in the metal, and an analysis of experimental results by Schmick-ler, suggest that electron transfer at the solution/metal interface is near the adiabatic limit. A particularly useful approach is based on the Anderson-Newns approach to adsorption. When it is adapted to the electron transfer problem, the total Hamiltonian of the system is given... [Pg.168]

The empirical valence bond (EVB) approach introduced by Warshel and co-workers is an effective way to incorporate environmental effects on breaking and making of chemical bonds in solution. It is based on parame-terizations of empirical interactions between reactant states, product states, and, where appropriate, a number of intermediate states. The interaction parameters, corresponding to off-diagonal matrix elements of the classical Hamiltonian, are calibrated by ab initio potential energy surfaces in solu-fion and relevant experimental data. This procedure significantly reduces the computational expenses of molecular level calculations in comparison to direct ab initio calculations. The EVB approach thus provides a powerful avenue for studying chemical reactions and proton transfer events in complex media, with a multitude of applications in catalysis, biochemistry, and PEMs. [Pg.383]

Q vibration is not directly coupled to the bath of harmonic oscillators. This assumption is similar to the approach employed by Silbey and Suarez who used a tunneling splitting that depends on the oscillating transfer distance Q in their spin-boson Hamiltonian. Borgis and Hynes, too, have made this assumption in the context of Marcus theory. [Pg.81]

Of course, the function G (s) does not contain any new information in addition to g(s). The reason that two physically equivalent quantities have been introduced, is that there are two approaches to the dynamics of charge transfer, as explained earlier either one starts from the OLE (when (t) is the observable and G(s) is the fundamental quantity) or one starts from the Hamiltonian Eq. (36), when the coupling g(s) is the fundamental quantity. The work of Voth and collaborators " gives a strong indication that these two approaches are equivalent, as in the case of the position-independent friction. [Pg.84]

We use this general approach to optimize a reliable transfer of a quantum state from a fragile (noisy) qubit to a robust (quiet) qubit. We choose to focus on the case of two resonant qubits with temporally controlled coupling strength. The free Hamiltonian without decoherence is then... [Pg.190]

V. Levich and R. R. Dogonadze, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 124 123 (1959). Hamiltonian formulation for electron transfer dielectric polarization approach. Quantum aspects of Weiss-Marcus model developed. [Pg.807]


See other pages where Transfer Hamiltonian approach is mentioned: [Pg.100]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.2203]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.396]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.265]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.476]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.82]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info