Transfer functions trends interpreted

The trends In the transfer functions, as the concentration of solute 2 Is varied to cover Its pre- and post-mlcellar region, can be Interpreted In terms of three main factors If both solutes are hydro-phobic (6,10). 

An analysis and a physical interpretation of these observations will now be proposed. In order to analyse and classify the different heat transfer coefficient behaviours observed on figures 4 and 5 it is useful to represent, for a given vapour quality, the heat transfer coefficient as a function of the heat flux and the heat flux as a function of the wall-fluid temperature difference. For Dj, = 2 mm, since Co < 0.5, the results were analysed in terms of macroscale boiling. This was done on figure 8, which exhibits two trends ... 

Although both primary H/T and D/T isotope effects were measured as a function of temperature, the focus of the interpretation was on primary D/T isotope effects, since the smaller commitment for D- than H-transfer leads to a more complete contribution of the chemical step to the measured parameters (see e.g. Section 10.21). The results obtained from this study [92], as well as the earlier work [91], indicate a striking trend in which the value of Ad /At moves from near unity to below unity as the surface of the protein is modified (either by glycosylation or addition of polyethylene glycol). A similar type of pattern has been seen in other enzyme systems, such as the thermophilic ADH [24] (Section 10.5.1.1) and soybean lipoxygenase (SLO) [43] (see Section 10.5.3.1 below) where modification of reaction conditions away from either optimal temperature (ht-ADH) or optimal protein packing (via... 

---