Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Time of storage at rest

The following variables can affect wall friction values of a bulk soHd. (/) Pressure as the pressure acting normal to the wall increases, the coefficient of sliding friction often decreases. (2) Moisture content as moisture increases, many bulk soHds become more frictional. (3) Particle size and shape typically, fine materials are somewhat more frictional than coarse materials. Angular particles tend to dig into a wall surface, thereby creating more friction. (4) Temperature for many materials, higher temperatures cause particles to become more frictional. (5) Time of storage at rest if allowed to remain in contact with a wall surface, many soHds experience an increase in friction between the particles and the wall surface. (6) Wall surface smoother wall surfaces are typically less frictional. Corrosion of the surface obviously can affect the abiUty of the material to sHde on it. [Pg.554]

Factors Affecting Material Flow. Although material flow is a function of its cohesive properties, factors known to affect material flowability include moisture content, temperature, particle size, and time of storage at rest. Therefore, the flow properties of material should be measured to determine the effects of the environmental conditions discussed below. [Pg.442]

A material s flow function, which can be determined only by shear tests, is often strongly influenced by its temperature, time of storage at rest, moisture content and particle size distribution. A hopper s flow factor is a function of the effective angle of internal friction (6), wall friction angle (< w) and hopper geometry. [Pg.75]

Induced instability of a dispersion is the most important form of instability encountered in practice, for here the dispersion is unable to maintain a given structure during changes in storage conditions. Sometimes the structural breakdown is permanent (in which case the initial dispersion at rest is metastable) at other times the structure is rebuilt on removal of the external influence. [Pg.96]

When a powder resides in a storage container for a period of time without moving, it can become more cohesive. Settling and compaction, crystallization, chemical reactions or adhesive bonding can cause such cohesion. These effects can be further influenced by the humidity and temperature of the environment, as discu.ssed previously. The powder may also experience adhesion if allowed to remain at rest against a surface, such as the steel of a container or a plastic bag liner. Adhesion can result in an increase in wall friction between the material and the surface, which can require hopper angles or external forces (e.g., vibration) to overcome the adhesion effects. [Pg.110]

One class of compounds does deserve special attention—those chemicals that are very fat soluble. These include the older chlorinated pesticides, such as DDT, and some environmental contaminants, such as the PCBs (the polychlorinated biphenyls) and dioxins. In these cases, low levels of intact chemicals, if absorbed, may encounter the body s final defense mechanism. This defense is to store the compounds in fat and milk, a paradoxical strategy that the body uses to sequester away chemicals into a storage site (or depot) where they can do no harm to the rest of the body, ft s conceptually the prison system of the body. The absorption and distribution into fat greatly reduces the concentration of chemicals at other body sites and thus serves to blunt the impact of the exposure. Similarly, this simple method of diluting the absorbed chemical often keeps the concentration below an effect level and gives the overworked liver time to try to destroy them. [Pg.29]

The stability of the bienzymatic NaR-SODl-CNT-PPy-Pt electrode was evaluated by monitoring the current response three times a day in the presence of 100 nM nitrite and 300 nM nitrate over four weeks, and the rest of the time it was stored at 4 °C. The SODl and NaR were quite stable, as inferred from their electrocatalytical activity of 92% and 89.6%, respectively, after one month of storage and 83% and 76%, respectively, after two months of storage. RepeatabiHty of the bienzymatic biosensor was tested by... [Pg.185]

The view that BdR is at best the adsorption-desorption balance of rubber segments on CB sites at a given time (and temperature) is clearly supported by the above model. As long as an equilibrium is not reached however, the adsorption-desorption mechanism evolves while the compound is at rest, hence the observed variations upon storage. How fast this equilibrium BdR is reached depends on the chemical nature of the rubber, on the compound formulation, on the mixing and the dump compound storage conditions. [Pg.120]


See other pages where Time of storage at rest is mentioned: [Pg.554]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.547]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.342]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.595]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.400]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.69]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.107]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.73 , Pg.94 ]




SEARCH



Restful

Storage times

© 2024 chempedia.info