Tilted-drop technique

The relationship between adhesive force and particle size cannot be fully determined by the tilted-plate technique. As the detaching force is increased by approximately 3 orders of magnitude (7.6 10 dyn for 5-15 fjm particles and 1.0 10" for 100-300 fjtm particles), the adhesion number drops off by a factor of only 12. As the size of the particles lying on the surface increases, the pressure of these particles on the surface also increases, distorting the true relationship between adhesive force and particle size. A directly proportional relationship has been found between the minimum force of adhesion Fj in and the size of quartz particles with a range of diameters from 3 to 40 jitm. For these particles, the adhesive force increases from 0.1 to 4.4 iudyn. For these particles and also for particles with diameters up to 100 jum, the relative force of adhesion, which is equal to Finin/ (where P is the particle weight), or the force of adhesion expressed in g-units, is constant and equal, with a value of 3.4 for quartz particles and 1.7 for rosin particles [15]. 

Figure 3.7. Methods of conducting sessile drop experiments (a) classic technique, (b) in situ formation of an alloy, (c) dispensed drop, (d) transferred drop, (e) double substrate, (0 tilted plate.

To enhance corneal drug absorption, the tear film concentration can be prolonged by manually blocking the nasolacrimal ducts or by tilting the head back to reduce drainage (see Chapter 3). Another effective technique to increase corneal penetration is to administer a series of ophthalmic solutions at intervals of approximately 10 minutes. It has been determined, however, that when different drug formulations are given as drops in rapid succession, the medications first applied are diluted and do not achieve fiill therapeutic potential. 

There are a variety of simple and inexpensive techniques for measuring contact angles, most of which are described in detail in various texts and publications and will be mentioned only briefly here. The most common direct methods (Fig. 17.4) include the sessile drop (a), the captive bubble (b), the sessile bubble (c), and the tilting plate (d). Indirect methods include tensiometry and geometric analysis of the shape of a meniscus. For solids for which the above methods are not applicable, such as powders and porous materials, methods based on capillary pressures, sedimentation rates, wetting times, imbibition rates, and other properties, have been developed. 

Not only were more techniques accessible with the 170, but there was a wider choice of parameters than those available on the 171. The upper limit on scan rate increased to 500 V/s pulse durations would be varied from 1 ms to 500 s. For pulse techniques, pulse modulations were possible from 45-65 ms with a 5-20 ms current integration at the end of each pulse, all timing being synchronized with the mechanical drop timer. Full scale current outputs ranged from 1 nA to 0.5 mA. A tilt light was used to inform the operator that the sequence of operations could not be performed due to an invalid set of conditions chosen. 

The technique oi application is important for obtaining reproducible results Equal volumes of the standards and the sample solutions must be applied as drops to the start line. An Agla micro-syringe, fixed so that the needle outlet is 2 mm above the adsorbent layer, can be used. The drop which emerges as a result of turning the micrometer screw can be brought on to the layer by cautiously tilting the plate towards the needle [548]. Methanol and ethanol are convenient solvents of intermediate volatility. 

Experimentally, contact angle is measured based on geometry of the droplet or the interfacial tension across the contact line using various techniques such as tilting plate, sessile bubble and drop, captive bubble, the Wilhelmy method, and so on. Similarly, in simulation, three methods are generally used to find the contact angle. 

Advancing and receding contact angle should be determined by the drop expansion/ contraction technique. The tilting plate method has significant shortfall particularly with high hysteresis samples and should be avoided if possible. 

---