Tight-binding methods Hamiltonian

The Tight-Binding Method. The tight-binding method starts from the Hamiltonian for the ionic (or molecular) core ... 

At the lowest level of sophistication of quantum treatments, the tight-binding method and the semi-empirical HF method reduce the complexity of the interacting electron system to the diagonalization of an effective one-electron Hamiltonian matrix, whose elements contain empirical parameters. The electronic wave functions are expanded on a minimal basis set of atomic or Slater orbitals centered on the atoms and usually restricted to valence orbitals. The matrix elements are self-consistently determined or not, depending upon the method. 

In the tight-binding method, the elements of the Hamiltonian matrix axe treated as adjustable parameters to be fitted to experimental or first-... 

Because they are so computationally intensive, ab initio and semiempirical studies are limited to models that are about 10 rings or less. In order to study more reahstic carbon structures, approximations in the form of the Hamiltonian (i.e., Schrodinger equation) are necessary. The tight-binding method, in which the many-body wave function is expressed as a product of individual atomic orbitals, localized on the atomic centers, is one such approximation that has been successfully applied to amorphous and porous carbon systems [47]. 

The approximation of the one-electron Hamiltonian is the next step in the framework of the one-electron approximation - the electron-electron interactions are excluded from the Hamiltonian. In solid-state theory the LCAO one-electron Hamiltonian approximation is known as the tight binding method. In molecular quantum chemistry the one-electron Hamiltonians of Huckel or Mulhken-Rtidenberg tjqses (see Chap. 6) were popular in the 1950s and the beginning of the 1960s when the first-principles, Hartree-Fock LCAO calculations were practically impossible. 

The tight-binding band structure calculations were based upon the effective one-electron Hamiltonian of the extended Huckel method. [5] The off-diagonal matrix elements of the Hamiltonian were calculated acording to the modified Wolfsberg-Helmholtz formula. All valence electrons were explicitly taken into account in the calculations and the basis set consisted of double- Slater-type orbitals for C, O and S and a single- Slater-type orbitals for H. The exponents, contraction coefficients and atomic parameters were taken from previous work [6],... 

Section III is devoted to illustrating the first theoretical tool under discussion in this review, the GME derived from the Liouville equation, classical or quantum, through the contraction over the irrelevant degrees of freedom. In Section III.A we illustrate Zwanzig s projection method. Then, in Section III.B, we show how to use this method to derive a GME from Anderson s tight binding Hamiltonian The second-order approximation yields the Pauli master equation. This proves that the adoption of GME derived from a Hamiltonian picture requires, in principle, an infinite-order treatment. The case of a vanishing diffusion coefficient must be considered as a case of anomalous diffusion, and the second-order treatment is compatible only with the condition of ordinary... 

Recently Lambin and Gaspard presented an implemented version of the modified moments method, which calculates directly the modified moments for Hamiltonians of the tight binding form. We will discuss this issue in connection with solid state physics problems (see Chapter IV). 

As an example of the study of vacancies and self-interstitial impurities by the continued fraction expansion of Eq. (S.2S), we mention the work of Kauffer et al. These authors consider impurities in silicon and set up a model tight-binding Hamiltonian with s p hybridization, which satisfactorily describes the valence and conduction bands of the perfect crystal. A cluster of 2545 atoms is generated, and vacancies (or self-interstitial impurities) are introduced at the center of the cluster. One then takes as a seed state an appropriate orbital or symmetrized combination of orbitals, and the recursion method is started. Though self-consistent potential modifications are neglected in this paper, the model leads to qualitatively satisfactory results within a simple physical picture. 

Within the tight-binding (TB) approach. Slater and Roster [64] described the linear combination of atomic orbitals (LCAO) method as an eflRcient scheme for calculation of the electronic structure of periodic solids. As this method is computationally much less demanding than other methods such as the plane-wave methods, it has been extensively employed to calculate electronic structures of various metals, semiconductors, clusters and a number of complex systems such as alloys and doped systems. The calculation of the electronic structure requires solving the Schrodinger equation with the TB Hamiltonian given by... 

---