Thiele-Geddes method

In some computer applications of the method, where the assumption of constant molar overflow is not made, it is convenient to start the calculations by assuming flow and temperature profiles. The stage component compositions can then be readily determined and used to revise the profiles for the next iteration. With this modification the procedure is similar to the Thiele-Geddes method discussed in the next section. 

In general, the Lewis-Matheson method has not been found to be an efficient procedure for computer solutions, other than for relatively straightforward problems. It is not suitable for problems involving multiple feeds, and side-streams, or where more than one column is needed. 

Like the Lewis-Matheson method, the original method of Thiele and Geddes (1933) was developed for manual calculation. It has subsequently been adapted by many workers for computer applications. The variables specified in the basic method, or that must be derived from other specified variables, are  

Number of equilibrium stages above and below the feed point. 

The basic procedure used in the Thiele-Geddes method, with examples, is described in books by Smith (1963) and Deshpande (1985). The application of the method to computers is covered in a series of articles by Lyster el al. (1959) and Holland (1963). 

---

The method starts with an assumption of the column temperature and flow profiles. The stage equations are then solved to determine the stage component compositions and the results used to revise the temperature profiles for subsequent trial calculations. Efficient convergence procedures have been developed for the Thiele-Geddes method. The so-called theta method , described by Lyster et al. (1959) and Holland (1963), is recommended. The Thiele-Geddes method can be used for the solution of complex distillation problems,... 

The two principal tray-by-tray procedures that were performed manually are the Lewis and Matheson and Thiele and Geddes. The former started with estimates of the terminal compositions and worked plate-by-plate towards the feed tray until a match in compositions was obtained. Invariably adjustments of the amounts of the components that appeared in trace or small amounts in the end compositions had to be made until they appeared in the significant amounts of the feed zone. The method of Thiele and Geddes fixed the number of trays above and below the feed, the reflux ratio, and temperature and liquid flow rates at each tray. If the calculated terminal compositions are not satisfactory, further trials with revised conditions are performed. The twisting of temperature and flow profiles is the feature that requires most judgement. The Thiele-Geddes method in some modification or other is the basis of most current computer methods. These two forerunners of current methods of calculating multicomponent phase separations are discussed briefly with calculation flowsketches by Hines and Maddox (1985). 

Taylor method, 189-192 Tellerette packing, 437, 485. 500 Thiele-Geddes method, 145, 146. 153 Thomas algorithm. 151, 152, 159 Thorogood tray maldistribution model, 386... 

A modified Thiele-Geddes method, programmed for an IBM 370-155, was used to perform the calculations needed to size each required column. Experimental activity coefficient data were used to allow for nonideal liquid phase behavior while energy balances, using estimated enthalpy data, were used to correct for non-constant molal overflow. The Theta Method was used for convergence, and all plate efficiencies were assumed to be 100%. (See Reference 7 for additional calculational details and a program listing.)... 

---