Thermodynamic derivatives higher-order

Friedman (1962) has used the cluster theory of Mayer (1950) to derive equations which give the thermodynamic properties of electrolyte solutions as the sum of convergent series. The first term in these series is identical to and thus confirms the Debye-Huckel limiting law. The second term is an I2.nl term whose coefficient is, like the coefficient in the Debye-Huckel limiting law equation, a function of the charge type of the salt and the properties of the solvent. From this theory, as well as from others referred to above, a higher order limiting law can be written as... 

We first observe that higher-order derivatives of U or S are implicitly related to changes of state from the initial state to a nearby equilibrium state along a reversible path. Suppose that we parameterize the thermodynamic state Ms... 

Thus, the metric elements Mtj that underlie the geometry of Ms themselves become geometrical vectors My) of Ms, if the higher-order derivative vectors mLj (or conjugate m-) are known. This testifies to the rather mind-bending mathematical richness of thermodynamic geometry. 

This/2x / matrix (matrix of vectors), or the conjugate m matrix, contains the higher-order response functions needed to fully incorporate higher-order (U ") derivatives into the thermodynamic geometry. Geometrical identities for higher-order response functions can then be obtained in analogy to Sections 12.1-12.5. 

In Fig. 3 c the schematic volume-temperature curve of a non crystallizing polymer is shown. The bend in the V(T) curve at the glass transition indicates, that the extensive thermodynamic functions, like volume V, enthalpy H and entropy S show (in an idealized representation) a break. Consequently the first derivatives of these functions, i.e. the isobaric specific volume expansion coefficient a, the isothermal specific compressibility X, and the specific heat at constant pressure c, have a jump at this point, if the curves are drawn in an idealized form. This observation of breaks for the thermodynamic functions V, H and S in past led to the conclusion that there must be an internal phase transition, which could be a true thermodynamic transformation of the second or higher order. In contrast to this statement, most authors... 

The Duffing Equation 14.4 seems to be a model in order to describe the nonlinear behavior of the resonant system. A better agreement between experimentally recorded and calculated phase portraits can be obtained by consideration of nonlinear effects of higher order in the dielectric properties and of nonlinear losses (e.g. [6], [7]). In order to construct the effective thermodynamic potential near the structural phase transition the phase portraits were recorded at different temperatures above and below the phase transition. The coefficients in the Duffing Equation 14.4 were derived by the fitted computer simulation. Figure 14.6 shows the effective thermodynamic potential of a TGS-crystal with the transition from a one minimum potential to a double-well potential. So the tools of the nonlinear dynamics provide a new approach to the study of structural phase transitions. 

Since the glass transition is characterized by discontinuous changes in second- (and higher) order thermodynamic properties, it would seem relevant to give some attention to what might be termed second-order structural properties. Just as n r), from which g(r) is derived, is the average number of particles within a sphere of radius r around a reference particle, so we can define moments about this mean distribution. Here we focus on the second moment, termed the radial fluctuation function W(r), and defined as follows ... 

Here the coefficients G2, G, and so on, are functions ofp and T, presumably expandable in Taylor series aroundp-p and T-T. However, it is frequently overlooked that the derivation is accompanied by the comment that since. .. the second-order transition point must be some singular point of the thermodynamic potential, there is every reason to suppose that such an expansion cannot be carried out up to terms of arbitrary order , but that there are grounds to suppose that its singularity is of higher order than that of the terms of the expansion used . The theory developed below was based on this assumption. 

Most of the previous developments have proceeded from Maxwell s boundary conditions which are known now to be in error. WALDMANN and co-workers have derived thermodynamically consistent boundary conditions for higher-order constitutive equations. For monatomic gases and Maxwell molecules, these constitutive equations reduce to Grad s 13 moment equations. However, WALDMANN has pointed out that Grad s boundary conditions are thermodynamically inconsistent. For the drag force problem, VESTNER and WALDMANN derived... 

From Waldmann s derivation of thermodynamically consistent boundary conditions for higher-order constitutive equations (valid for small Kn ) [2.103], it appears that the theoretical developments just cited, including those of DERJAGUIN and co-workers, have proceeded from either thermodynamically inconsistent boundary conditions or inaccurate (e.g.. Maxwell s) boundary conditions. Therefore, the apparent agreement suggested, for example by SPRINGER [2.134], PHILLIPS [2.128], or ANNIS and MASON [2.135] may be fortuitous, particularly for the slip regime. 

This semigrand partition function approach as phrased in the context of KB theory thus allows one to obtain average structural information from thermodynamic data. We have made some series truncation approximations and so we must ask to what extent the success of the method depends on our assumptions. To consider this we turn to simulation and calculate some of the quantities we have derived. Simulation is, of course, always model dependent but this gives an otherwise independent view of the success of our low-order activity series theory. In particular, by using the ratio of partition functions as parameters in an activity series expansion for quantities such as N2) we must address whether these are the real coefficients or effective coefficients, which have considerable contributions or take up the slack from higher-order terms in the series. So for instance, at infinite dilution we can write... 

There was, however, one important follow-up paper, by Buff and Brout (1955). The reader may have noticed that the Kirkwood-Buff paper concerns exclusively those properties of solutions that can be obtained from the grand potential by differentiation with respect to pressure or particle number. Those such as partial molar energies, entropies, heat capacities, and so forth, are completely ignored. The original KB theory is an isothermal theory. The Buff-Brout paper completes the story by extending the theory to those properties derivable by differentiation with respect to the temperature. Because these functions can involve molecular distribution functions of higher order than the second, they are not as useful as the original KB theory. Yet they do provide a coherent framework for a complete theory of solution thermodynamics and not just the isothermal part. 

In Section 4.8, we considered the limiting behavior of the chemical potential as 0. We have seen that the formal appearance of the chemical potential is independent of the thermodynamic variables used to describe the system. In this section, we discuss first-order deviations from DI solutions. In fact, these nonideal cases are of foremost importance in practical applications. There exist formal statistical mechanical expressions for the higher-order deviations of DI behavior however, their practical value is questionable since they usually involve higher-order molecular distribution functions. As in the previous section, we derive all the necessary relations from the Kirkwood-Buff theory, and we will be mainly concerned with the behavior of the solute A,... 

The modern cubic equations of state provide reliable predictions for pure-component thermodynamic properties at conditions where the substance is a gas, liquid or supercritical. Walas and Valderrama provided a thorough evaluation and recommendations on the use of cubic equation of state for primary and derivative properties. Vapour pressures for non-polar and slightly polar fluids can be calculated precisely from any of the modem cubic equations of state presented above (Soave-Redlich-Kwong, Peng-Robinson or Patel-Teja). The use of a complex funetion for a (such as those proposed by Twu and co-workers ) results in a significant improvement in uncertainty of the predicted values. For associating fluids (such as water and alcohols), a higher-order equation of state with explicit account for association, such as either the Elliott-Suresh-Donohue or CPA equations of state, are preferred. For saturated liquid volumes, a three-parameter cubic equation of state (such as Patel-Teja) should be used, whereas for saturated vapour volumes any modern cubic equation of state can be used. 

We have derived the ideal gas law from a simple model for the dependence of 5 on V, using the thermodynamic definition of pressure. We will show in Chapter 24 that keeping the next higher order term in the expansion gives a refinement toward the van der Waals gas law. 

We will restrict our attention to linear processes for which the deviation from equilibrium is small, and the derivatives of the thermodynamic variables are then to be treated as small quantities. Thus second and higher powers of the derivatives are to be neglected, while derivatives of second and higher order may be retained. In addition, we will assume the local velocity, as well as its derivatives, to be small this actually involves no loss in generality since one can always perform a Galilean transformation to bring any element of the fluid to rest. 

---