Thermal analysis interfacial temperature

However, as with the penetration theory analysis, the difference in magnitude of the mass and thermal diffusivities with cx 100 D, means that the heat transfer film is an order of magnitude thicker than the mass transfer film. This is depicted schematically in Fig. 8, The fall in temperature from T over the distance x is (if a = 100 D) about 0% of the overall interface excess temperature above the datum temperature T.. Furthermore, in considering the location of heat release oue to reaction in the mass transfer film, this is bound to be greatest closest to the interface, and this is especially the case when the reaction becomes fast. Therefore, two simplifications can be introduced as a result of this (i) the release of heat of reaction can be treated as am interfacial heat flux and (ii) the reaction can be assumed to take place at the interfacial temperature T. The differential equation for diffusion and reaction can therefore be written... 

The availability of bubble point data using multiple pressurant gases over such a wide range of thermodynamic conditions warrants further thermal analysis. To compare between pressurization schemes, screen interfacial temperatures, screen Re numbers. 

While pressure sensitive adhesive performance at various temperatures can be determined by practical tests, as described above, it is also possible to predict the temperature performance of pressure sensitive adhesives. The polymers used in pressure sensitive adhesives will have a variety of glass transition temperatures (Tg), and for a pressure sensitive adhesive to be effective, the formulated mass must have a Tg of between 50°C and 70°C below the temperature at which the adhesive is to be used. At the same time, however, the Tg cannot be so low that the adhesive mass is so soft that it fails cohesively even at room temperature. A variety of analytical techniques used to determine the Tg of the adhesive mass include Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC), Differential Thermal Analysis (DTA), and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA). Of these, the most commonly used method is DMA. DMA will measure the bulk properties of the adhesive mass, which will include the base polymer and any additives in it. It does not take into consideration any interfacial relationships between the adhesive and the surfaces to which it is bonded. 

The above analysis applies to degradation processes that relate to the bulk adhesive. Interfacial degradation processes such as corrosion can be similarly determined. Thermal and oxidative stability, as well as corrosion and water resistance, depends on the adherend surface as well as on the adhesive itself. Epoxy-based adhesives degrade less rapidly at elevated temperatures when in contact with glass or aluminum than when in contact with copper, nickel, magnesium, or zinc. The divalent metals have a more basic oxide surface than the higher-valence metal oxides and hence serve to promote dehydrogenation reactions, which lead to anion formation and chain scission.7... 

Combination of several properties is becoming increasingly important in modem industry. One example may be taken from electronics, where in addition to mechanical properties and electric resistance, themial stability and conductivity are important requirements. It was estimated that the increase of temperature by 10°C reduces time to failure by the factor of two." A finite analysis model was developed which accounts for the following properties of filled composites microstructure, effect of particle shape, formation of conductive chains, effect of filler aspect ratio, and interfacial thermal resistance. The predictions of the model indicate the most... 

The thermogravimetric analysis on TiO -polypropylene nanocomposite fibers show an increase in thermal degradation temperature for nanocomposite system compared to pristine polypropylene [67]. This improvement is attributed to the good adhesion between PP and TiO. Good interfacial adhesion between the particles and the polymer helps the nanoparticle to effectively restrict the motion of the polymer chain. It makes the fragmentation of the polymer chain harder at lower temperature and. shifts the degradation temperature to the higher side. 

H. M. Clearfield joined Martin Marietta Laboratories in January, 1985. Since then, he has primarily investigated surface and interfacial phenomena in adhesive bonding, including surface preparation of titanium alloys for structural applications at high service temperatures, mechanisms of bond failures that occur at high temperatures, and bonding of the thermal protection system to the space shuttle external tank. Additionally, he has investigated dopant depth distributions in ion-implanted and laser-annealed silicon. Dr, Clearfield is supervisor of surface analysis facilities at Martin Marietta Laboratories. Recently, Dr. Clearfield joined IBM s T. J. Watson Research Center. 

---