The Quantum Mechanical State

It is convenient to define a state of a system in quantum mechanics. All (physical) information that can be known about a quantum mechanical system is contained in a quantum mechanical state function, which is also called a wave function mainly for historical reasons. In order to be able to distinguish different states of a system we introduce the subscript n to label these different states. The term quantum mechanical system will denote an elementary particle or a collection of elementary particles. In chemistry, it is a collection of electrons and atomic nuclei constituting an atom, a molecule or an assembly of atoms and molecules. 

---

The discussion in this chapter is limited to cyanine-like NIR conjugated molecules, and further, is limited to discussing their two-photon absorption spectra with little emphasis on their excited state absorption properties. In principle, if the quantum mechanical states are known, the ultrafast nonlinear refraction may also be determined, but that is outside the scope of this chapter. The extent to which the results discussed here can be transferred to describe the nonlinear optical properties of other classes of molecules is debatable, but there are certain results that are clear. Designing molecules with large transition dipole moments that take advantage of intermediate state resonance and double resonance enhancements are definitely important approaches to obtain large two-photon absorption cross sections. 

It is now assumed that the vectors E and H describe the quantum mechanical state of a photon, or quantum of light, as the counterpart of the particle in atomic systems. This assumption is conveniently formulated in terms the Fourier transforms of the field equations... 

The quantum-mechanical state is represented in abstract Hilbert space on the basis of eigenfunctions of the position operator, by F(q, t). If the eigenvectors of an abstract quantum-mechanical operator are used as a basis, the operator itself is represented by a diagonal square matrix. In wave-mechanical formalism the position and momentum matrices reduce to multiplication by qi and (h/2ni)(d/dqi) respectively. The corresponding expectation values are... 

Finally, we will assume the Pauli exclusion principle. The simplest form of the exclusion principle is that no two electrons can occupy the same quantum state. This is a watered-down version, designed for people who may not understand linear algebra. A stronger statement of the Pauli exclusion principle is no more than n particles can occupy an n-dimensional subspace of the quantum mechanical state space. In other words, if (/)i, are wave func-... 

Note that entanglement occurs independently of any classical interaction of the particles. In other words, entanglement occurs for free particles as well as for particles exerting forces on one another. To put it yet another way, the possibility of entanglement arises from the quantum mechanical state space itself, not from any differential equation or differential operator used to describe the evolution of the system. 

With a general understanding of the form of nuclear potentials, we can begin to solve the problem of the calculation of the properties of the quantum mechanical states that will fill the energy well. One might imagine that the nucleons will have certain finite energy levels and exist in stationary states or orbitals in the nuclear well similar to the electrons in the atomic potential well. This interpretation is... 

In the short term, the value of such studies must lie in what we can learn about how chemistry changes when the quantum mechanical state of a molecule changes, and how the additional energy, distributed over the molecule, modifies its chemistry. In the long term, new industrially important processes may depend upon the use of excited state molecules. 

The quantum mechanical description of DNMR spectra runs back over several decades.16 In the widespread theory based on the average density matrix, the quantum mechanical state functions are time dependent ... 

We note that the quantum-mechanical state of a photon, the counterpart of a particle in atomic systems, is described by a wave function in momentum space [15]—p.246. Electromagnetic waves, such as X-rays, that are scattered on an electron, are of this type. Taking the Fourier transform of such a scattered wave must therefore reveal the position of the scatterer. 

In addition to the quantum approaches mentioned above, classical optimal control theories based on classical mechanics have also been developed [3-6], These methods control certain classical parameters of the system like the average nuclear coordinates and the momentum. The optimal laser held is given as an average of particular classical values with respect to the set of trajectories. The system of equations is solved iteratively using the gradient method. The classical OCT deals only with classical trajectories and thus incurs much lower computational costs compared to the quantum OCT. However, the effects of phase are not treated properly and the quantum mechanical states cannot be controlled appropriately. For instance, the selective excitation of coupled states cannot be controlled via the classical OCT and the spectrum of the controlling held does not contain the peaks that arise from one- and multiphoton transitions between quantum discrete states. 

Figure 13. Plot of the action integral 3 as a function of the absolute energy E for polyads [Vu,P] = [0,7], [0,14], and [0,30] of HOBr. The Hamiltonian is the Fermi resonance Hamiltonian of Eqs. (24) and (27) with parameters from Table I of Ref. 41. The vertical lines indicate the energies of the various periodic orbits. The quantum mechanical states belonging to the normal and the new progression are indicated by filled circles and open diamonds, respectively. Note that the horizontal energy scale for polyads P = 1 and P = 14 is expanded twice compared to P = 30.

If the classical dynamics is ergodic and intrinsically RRKM, one might expect that the classical rate constant approximates the average rate of the quantum mechanical state-specific rates. That is indeed the case for the dissociation of HO2 (Fig. 12 of Ref. 60) the classical rate is only slightly smaller than the average quantum mechanical rate. The same holds also... 

These examples demonstrate that molecular structure and its stability are predicted by a theory which uses only the information contained in the quantum mechanical state function and that the static and dynamic properties of a bond can be characterized in terms of the properties of the charge density at the bond critical point. The values of Pb, ab, e, and V Pb enable one to translate the predicted electronic effects of orbital models into observable consequences in the charge distribution. 

An apparent next step is to describe the quantum mechanical state in terms of electron-pair functions, rather than one-electron functions [4], In fact the concept of electron pairs plays an important role in the theory of the chemical bond. 

To avoid using a predefined form for the interaction potential in molecular dynamics simulations, the quantum mechanical state of the many-electron system can be determined for a given nuclear configuration. From this quantum mechanical state, all properties of the system can be determined, in particular, the total electronic energy and the force on each of the nuclei. The quantum mechanically derived forces can then be used in place of the classically derived forces to propagate the atomic nuclei. This section describes the most widely used quantum mechanical method for computing these forces used in Car-Parrinello simulations. 

It follows from the first HK theorem that the non-degenerate ground-state is also uniquely determined by its electron density 1P0 = P0[p0]. Thus, p0(r) represents the alternative, exact specification of the molecular quantum-mechanical ground-state. In other words, there is a unique mapping between P,l and p0, P0 <-> po, so that both functions carry exactly all the information about the quantum-mechanical state of the N electron system. 

To summarize, the ground-state wavefunction, defined in the 4/V-dimensional configuration space, and the electron density, defined in the 3-dimensional physical space, constitute exactly equivalent definitions of the quantum-mechanical state of the iV-electron molecular system. They both carry the complete physical information about the system under consideration. The theory of electronic structure of matter can thus be rigorously based on the electronic density and this offers both computational and conceptual/interpretative advantages. 

II-A) to represent all the quantum mechanical states in which the LHS of Eq. (265) exists in the microscopic sense, i.e., molecules of species in any state, molecules of species Aj in any state, etc. (Similarly, we can define an operator for the RHS.) The number operator N may thus be written as... 

The introduction of the Hermitian scalar product into representation theory is quite analogous to the quantum mechanical state product which is associated with numerical values in the physical theory. The quantity Pit Pi) always real and is the squared modulus of the length of a vector. It is worth noting that the Hermitian scalar ( i, i) is independent of the basis vectors in the space. Because of the relation shown in Eq. 2.67, spaces in which a Hermitian scalar product is defined are known as unitary spaces. The space defined in Equation 5.5 is the space of square-integrable functions. 

A molecule has many charges in it, and they are distributed in a complex way, as governed by the quantum-mechanical state of the molecule. In general there is much more information about the electrostatic properties of the molecule than is contained in its dipole moment. However, at distances far from the molecule (as compared to the molecule s size), these details do not matter. The forces that one molecule exerts on another in this limit are strongly dominated by the dipole moments of the two molecules. In this limit, too, the details of the dipole moment s origin are irrelevant, and we consider the molecule to be a point dipole, with a dipole moment characterized by a magnitude p, and a direction i. We consider in this chapter only electrically neutral molecules, so that the Coulomb force between molecules is absent. 

Dunn, T.J., Wahnsley, I.A., and Mukamel, S., Experimental determination of the quantum-mechanical state of a molecular vihrational mode using fluorescence tomography, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 884—887, 1995. 

Fig. 3. Evolution of the quantum-mechanical state of a spin system in a Liouville space. The evolution from the initial time t = 0 to an intermediate time t = t takes place under a Hamiltonian Hint which describes internal and external spin interactions. At this time, a pulse sequence change the sign of the spin Hamiltonian. The spin system evolves on the same generalized trajectory and after total evolution time t — 2r the initial state is refocused under a spin echo.

The quantum mechanical state n) has no direct physical interpretation, but its absolute square, Y p=Y Y , can be interpreted as a probability density distribution. This soBorn interpretation implies for a single particle that the wave function has to be normalized, i.e., integration over all dynamical variables of a system must yield unity. 

We define the particle density distribution of the quantum mechanical state Y as... 

Apart from Lorentz covariance the quantum mechanical state equation must obey certain mathematical criteria (i) it must be homogeneous in order to fulfill Eq. (4.7) for all times, and (ii) it must be a linear equation so that linear combinations of solutions are also solutions. The latter requirement is often denoted as the superposition principle, which is required for the description of interference phenomena. However, it is equally well justified to regard these requirements as the consequences of the equation of motion in accordance with experiment if the equation of motion and the form of the Hamiltonian operator are postulated. 

In section 4.1 it was stated that all physical information is contained in the quantum mechanical state Y, but the question is how this information can be extracted. Any observable of a physical system is described by an hermitean operator acting on the corresponding Hilbert space. We further postulate that any experimentally measured value of a physical observable O must be identical to one of the eigenvalues of the corresponding operator 0,... 

Since the dimension of Y must necessarily be the same dimension as the one of the Dirac matrices we understand that it is, in general, an n-component vector of functions if the dimension of the Dirac matrices is n. In the standard representation, the quantum mechanical state Y is a vector of four functions, called a 4-spinor. 

---