The Polarization Limit Model

According to the polarization limit model, the polarization is added to the interaction between the ion and the drift gas molecule. If the neutral molecule does not have a permanent dipole or quadrupole moment and if there are no ion-neutral repulsive forces, then the interaction between the ion and the neutral molecule is due solely to the ion-induced dipole interaction. This interaction is a function of the polarizability of the neutral molecule a. The interaction potential varies as a function of the distance r between the ion and the neutral molecule (this r is not to be confused with from Equations 10.10 and 10.11), according to Equation 10.18  

The collision cross section is proportional to the expression [8 ap/( 7T], and all mobility coefficients approach a common limit as the tanperature approaches 0 K. This is dependent on the polarizability and is therefore called the polarization limit Kp i per Equation 10.19  

The number 13.853 is obtained for Kp i when is in units of A, m and M are in daltons, and K has units of square centimeters per volt per second at 273 K and 760 torr. When the mass of the ion is much larger than the mass of the neutral molecule, 1/m in the reduced mass term is negligible compared to 1/Af, so that the mobility is essentially independent of the ion mass, and the redueed mass simply becomes the mass of the drift gas. This contradicts physical intuition as well as experimental observations. In summary, the polarization limit model provides a poor description of several empirical observations in IMS. 

---

Several models have been proposed to account for the overall effect of these three forces on the motion of the ion, and some of the classical models are discussed here in brief, and their usefulness in predicting the mobility of polyatomic ions in different drift gases is examined. Two simple models are considered first the rigid sphere model and the polarization limit model. Next, a more refined yet relatively simple-to-use model is described in which a 12,4 hard-core potential represents the ion-neutral interaction. The more complex three-temperature model is not discussed because ions in linear IMS are traditionally regarded as thermalized. This is the one-temperature assumption, in which ion temperature is assumed to be equal to the temperature of the drift gas. 

In the rigid sphere model, the sum of the radii of the ion and the neutral molecule d will increase slightly as the chain length and ion mass in the homologous series increase. In the polarization limit model, the ion size is totally neglected, whereas in the hard-core potential model, (the minimum in the interaction potential) depends on the ion mass, as shown in Equation 10.22 ... 

FIGURE10.3 The measured inverse mobility of protonated acetyl compounds in air at 200°C as a function of ion mass. Curve a was calculated according to the rigid sphere model with Tq= 2.60 A curve b according to the polarization limit model curve c according to the hard-core model with a = 0.2, z = 0 A/amu, and Tq = 2.40 A curve d with a = 0.2, z = 0.0013 A/amu, and Tq= 2.20 A. (From Berant and Karpas, Mass-mobility correlation of ions in view of new mobility data, /. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 3819-3824. With permission.)... 

The motion of ions in a buffer gas is governed by diffusive forces, the external electric field and the electrostatic interactions between the ions and neutral gas molecules. Ion-dipole or ion-quadrupole interactions, as well as ion-induced dipole interactions, can lead to attractive forces that will slow the ion movement, mainly due to clustering effects. The interaction potential can be calculated according to different theories, and three such approaches—the hard-sphere model, the polarization limit model, and the 12,4 hard-core potential model— were introduced here. Under... 

Formal charge and oxidation number are two ways of defining atomic charge that are based on the two limiting models of the chemical bond, the covalent model and the ionic model, respectively. We expect the true charges on atoms forming polar bonds to be between these two extremes. 

Table II. Positive Deviations from the Debye—Hiickel Limiting-Law Calculated from the Polarized Spheres Model. Contributions from...

A variety of equations-of-state have been applied to supercritical fluids, ranging from simple cubic equations like the Peng-Robinson equation-of-state to the Statistical Associating Fluid Theoiy. All are able to model nonpolar systems fairly successfully, but most are increasingly chaUenged as the polarity of the components increases. The key is to calculate the solute-fluid molecular interaction parameter from the pure-component properties. Often the standard approach (i.e. corresponding states based on critical properties) is of limited accuracy due to the vastly different critical temperatures of the solutes (if known) and the solvents other properties of the solute... 

A limited number of minus-x orientation samples were impact loaded in the vicinity of the Hugoniot elastic limit at stresses from 5.9 to 6.7 GPa. The principal observation of these experiments was that positive currents were observed from negative polarity disks when a stress of 5.9 GPa was exceeded. Such an observation confirms that quartz responds as predicted by the model, and that the elastic limit is in the vicinity of 6 GPa. 

Applying the Tafel equation with Uq, we obtain the polarization curves for Pt and PtsNi (Fig. 3.10). The experimental polarization curves fall off at the transport limiting current since the model only deals with the surface catalysis, this part of the polarization curve is not included in the theoretical curves. Looking at the low current limit, the model actually predicts the relative activity semiquantitatively. We call it semiquantitative since the absolute value for the prefactor on Pt is really a fitting parameter. 

As mentioned earlier, heavy polar diatomic molecules, such as BaF, YbF, T1F, and PbO, are the prime experimental probes for the search of the violation of space inversion symmetry (P) and time reversal invariance (T). The experimental detection of these effects has important consequences [37, 38] for the theory of fundamental interactions or for physics beyond the standard model [39, 40]. For instance, a series of experiments on T1F [41] have already been reported, which provide the tightest limit available on the tensor coupling constant Cj, proton electric dipole moment (EDM) dp, and so on. Experiments on the YbF and BaF molecules are also of fundamental significance for the study of symmetry violation in nature, as these experiments have the potential to detect effects due to the electron EDM de. Accurate theoretical calculations are also absolutely necessary to interpret these ongoing (and perhaps forthcoming) experimental outcomes. For example, knowledge of the effective electric field E (characterized by Wd) on the unpaired electron is required to link the experimentally determined P,T-odd frequency shift with the electron s EDM de in the ground (X2X /2) state of YbF and BaF. 

Another limitation of the Caco-2 monolayers is their colonic origin and tight paracellular pathway, which tend to lead to underestimations in permeability to paracellularly transported compounds [97]. This is likely to be correct for small compounds (MW < 150) - i.e., compounds smaller than normal drugs - but it remains to be seen to what extent the Caco-2 model gives false-negative predictions of the fraction absorbed for polar drugs of normal size in humans where para-... 

On the other hand, some limitations are present in the proposed formalism. For instance, all the solute polarization is assumed to be electronic in nature. Orientational (temperature dependent) effects are not introduced in the present formulation of solvation effects. However, this limitation allowed us to adopt a simple linear response model for the representation of the induced electronic polarization through the polarization of an electron... 

---