The Polarizability

3 Induced Moments, Polarizability Isotope Effects 12.3.1 The Polarizability 

---

A more detailed description of the interaction accounts for the variation of the polarizability of the material with frequency. Then, the Hamaker constant across a vacuum becomes... 

It is thus seen that the dipole-induced dipole propagation gives an exponential rather than an inverse x cube dependence of U x) with x. As with the dispersion potential, the interaction depends on the polarizability, but unlike the dispersion case, it is only the polarizability of the adsorbed species that is involved. The application of Eq. VI-43 to physical adsoiption is considered in Section XVII-7D. For the moment, the treatment illustrates how a long-range interaction can arise as a propagation of short-range interactions. 

Consider the interaction of a neutral, dipolar molecule A with a neutral, S-state atom B. There are no electrostatic interactions because all the miiltipole moments of the atom are zero. However, the electric field of A distorts the charge distribution of B and induces miiltipole moments in B. The leading induction tenn is the interaction between the pennanent dipole moment of A and the dipole moment induced in B. The latter can be expressed in tenns of the polarizability of B, see equation (Al.S.g). and the dipole-mduced-dipole interaction is given by... 

Equation (A 1.6.94) is called the KHD expression for the polarizability, a. Inspection of the denominators indicates that the first temi is the resonant temi and the second temi is tire non-resonant temi. Note the product of Franck-Condon factors in the numerator one corresponding to the amplitude for excitation and the other to the amplitude for emission. The KHD fonnula is sometimes called the siim-over-states fonnula, since fonnally it requires a sum over all intennediate states j, each intennediate state participating according to how far it is from resonance and the size of the matrix elements that coimect it to the states i. and The KHD fonnula is fiilly equivalent to the time domain fonnula, equation (Al.6.92). and can be derived from the latter in a straightforward way. However, the time domain fonnula can be much more convenient, particularly as one detunes from resonance, since one can exploit the fact that the effective dynamic becomes shorter and shorter as the detuning is increased. 

Mineva T, Russo N and Sicilia E 1998 Solvation effects on reaction profiles by the polarizable continuum model coupled with Gaussian density functional method J. Oomp. Ohem. 19 290-9... 

Figure Bl.2.2. Schematic representation of the polarizability of a diatomic molecule as a fimction of vibrational coordinate. Because the polarizability changes during vibration, Raman scatter will occur in addition to Rayleigh scattering.

Raman scattering has been discussed by many authors. As in the case of IR vibrational spectroscopy, the interaction is between the electromagnetic field and a dipole moment, however in this case the dipole moment is induced by the field itself The induced dipole is pj j = a E, where a is the polarizability. It can be expressed in a Taylor series expansion in coordinate isplacement... 

Flere, is the static polarizability, a is the change in polarizability as a fiinction of the vibrational coordinate, a" is the second derivative of the polarizability with respect to vibration and so on. As is usually the case, it is possible to truncate this series after the second tenn. As before, the electric field is = EQCOslnvQt, where Vq is the frequency of the light field. Thus we have... 

In this case, the scattering serves as a means for counting the number of molecules (or particles, or objects) per unit volume (N/V). It is seen that the polarizability, a, will be greater for larger molecules, which will scatter more. If we take the Clausius-Mosotti equation [16] ... 

Equation (18) is valid when the polarizability of the dielectric is proportional to the electrostatic field strength [4]. The operator V in the Cartesian coordinate system has the form V = dldx,dldy,dldz). 

Figure 3-6. a) The charge distribution, b) the inductive effect, and c) the resonance effect, d) the polarizability effect, e) the steric effect, and f) the stereoelectronic effect,... 

To follow a simple scheme for calculating the polarizability effect... 

The contribution of an atomj to the polarizability effect is attenuated by the number of bonds, H , between this atom and the site of protonation, i. 

The molecular electronic polarizability is one of the most important descriptors used in QSPR models. Paradoxically, although it is an electronic property, it is often easier to calculate the polarizability by an additive method (see Section 7.1) than quantum mechanically. Ah-initio and DFT methods need very large basis sets before they give accurate polarizabilities. Accurate molecular polarizabilities are available from semi-empirical MO calculations very easily using a modified version of a simple variational technique proposed by Rivail and co-workers [41]. The molecular electronic polarizability correlates quite strongly with the molecular volume, although there are many cases where both descriptors are useful in QSPR models. 

The polarizability effect can be calculated by a simple attenuation model. 

Fundamental enthalpies of gas-phase reactions such as proton affinities or gas-phase acidities can be correlated with the values of the Inductive and the polarizability effect. 

The dielectric constant is a property of a bulk material, not an individual molecule. It arises from the polarity of molecules (static dipole moment), and the polarizability and orientation of molecules in the bulk medium. Often, it is the relative permitivity 8, that is computed rather than the dielectric constant k, which is the constant of proportionality between the vacuum permitivity so and the relative permitivity. 

This modification of the charge interaction is responsible for shifts in the electron density as permitted by the polarizability of the molecule. 

The susceptibility tensors give the correct relationship for the macroscopic material. For individual molecules, the polarizability a, hyperpolarizability P, and second hyperpolarizability y, can be defined they are also tensor quantities. The susceptibility tensors are weighted averages of the molecular values, where the weight accounts for molecular orientation. The obvious correspondence is correct, meaning that is a linear combination of a values, is a linear combination of P values, and so on. 

As implied by this, the polarizabilities can be formulated as derivatives of the dipole moment with respect to the incident electric held. Below these derivatives are given, with subscripts added to indicate their tensor nature ... 

There were two schools of thought concerning attempts to extend Hammett s treatment of substituent effects to electrophilic substitutions. It was felt by some that the effects of substituents in electrophilic aromatic substitutions were particularly susceptible to the specific demands of the reagent, and that the variability of the polarizibility effects, or direct resonance interactions, would render impossible any attempted correlation using a two-parameter equation. - o This view was not universally accepted, for Pearson, Baxter and Martin suggested that, by choosing a different model reaction, in which the direct resonance effects of substituents participated, an equation, formally similar to Hammett s equation, might be devised to correlate the rates of electrophilic aromatic and electrophilic side chain reactions. We shall now consider attempts which have been made to do this. 

The borderlines between the different classes are not hard and fast, depending as they do both on the shape of the pores and on the nature (especially the polarizability) of the adsorptive molecule. Thus, the highest value of w (and therefore of p/p ) at which the enhancement of adsorption occurs, i.e. the upper limit of the micropore range, will vary from one adsorptive to another (cf. Chapter 4). 

The lower pressure sub-region is characterized by a considerable enhancement of the interaction potential (Chapter 1) and therefore of the enthalpy of adsorption consequently the pore becomes completely full at very low relative pressure (sometimes 0 01 or less), so that the isotherm rises steeply from the origin. This behaviour is observed with molecular sieve zeolites, the enhancement of the adsorption energy and the steepness of the isotherm being dependent on the nature of the adsorbent-adsorbate interaction and the polarizability of the adsorbate. -... 

The enhancement of interaction energy in micropores was discussed in some detail in Chapter 4. It was emphasized that the critical pore width d at which the enhancement first appears increases with increasing diameter a of the adsorbate molecule, since the relevant parameter is the ratio d/a rather than d itself. The quantity a is involved because the magnitude of the dispersion interaction increases as the polarizability, and therefore the size, of the molecule increases (cf. p. 5). 

Equations (10.17) and (10.18) show that both the relative dielectric constant and the refractive index of a substance are measurable properties of matter that quantify the interaction between matter and electric fields of whatever origin. The polarizability is the molecular parameter which is pertinent to this interaction. We shall see in the next section that a also plays an important role in the theory of light scattering. The following example illustrates the use of Eq. (10.17) to evaluate a and considers one aspect of the applicability of this quantity to light scattering. 

---