Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

The Expression for K T

Evaluation, therefore, of the equilibrium constant for a given reaction as a function of temperature requires  [Pg.552]

If heat capacity data are not available, we can assume that AH° is independent of temperature and integrate Eq. 15.3.1  [Pg.552]

9 gives good results for reasonable distances from Tq, as Example 15.2 will demonstrate. [Pg.552]

Standard enthalpies of formation are calculated from calorimetric measurements, mostly combustion reactions, and those for the free energy through the relationship  [Pg.552]

The latter may be obtained from the absolute entropies of the pure species involved, calculated from Eq.3.12.3  [Pg.553]


Given the expression for K(T), one can construct an EOS by modeling the excess free energy density by = HS + u + ID + DI + DD + where is summed over contributions from hard-sphere (HS), ion-ion (II), ion-dipole (ID), dipole-ion (DI), and dipole-dipole interactions (DD), respectively. 4>ex also contains the contribution due to the internal partition function of the ion pair, = — p lnK(T). Pairing theories differ in the terms retained in the expression for ex. [Pg.32]

Quantum effects associated with motions orthogonal to the reaction co-ordinate can be included by replacing classical partition functions in the expression for k T) by quantum mechanical partition functions (see below), and quantum effects associated with motion along the reaction co-ordinate can be included by estimating a factor, k(7), to allow for quantum mechanical tunnelling through the barrier. [Pg.28]

The first term allows for particles of radius less than or equal to Rlt which are completely decomposed at time t, and the second term includes particles which are only partially reacted at the same time. The expression for a(t) must be solved separately, by numerical integration, for each value of t. The parameters C and k/p were shown to be largely (<10%) independent of particle size. Other features of the treatment are considered in the article [483]. [Pg.73]

In order to cast the expression for K(k) into a form that is convenient for its evaluation, it is useful to establish several relations first. To this end we let S(xN, t) denote the value of the phase point at time x whose value at time zero was x V. We then have... [Pg.140]

The kernel A(t/ t>) is a measure of the persistence of As velocity in a collision with initial and final speeds, v and t/, respectively. The expressions for K, A and A are given in [235]. Here, we mention that with a number of simplifying assumptions, such as velocity-independent collision frequencies, etc., the equivalent of Eq. 6.87, can be obtained from Eq. 6.88 computations based directly on Eq. 6.88 and realistic potential and dipole models have never been attempted. [Pg.351]

These equations say that if we know the value of either the decay constant k or the half-life t1/2r we can calculate the value of the other. Furthermore, if we know the value of fi/2, we can calculate the ratio of remaining and initial amounts of radioactive sample N/N0 at any time t by substituting the expression for k into the integrated rate law ... [Pg.955]

The mathematical derivation of the theoretical expression for k t for solvated electron transfers has been given elsewhere (8). The following assumptions were the principal ones made, of which (a) to (c) are standard in activated complex theory ... [Pg.146]

Note that the self-complementary and nonself-complementary processes of the same molecularity (n) give identical expressions for the van t Hoff enthalpy of the melting process, but not for the equilibrium constant. The factors in the expressions for K arise from the indistinguishability of 2A monomers in a process like A2 = 2A, while the A and B monomers in an AB = A + B process are distinguishable. [Pg.253]

The resulting expression is especially simple in the weak coupling case. In this case, the two propagators in Eq. (12) can be approximated by their first order (i.e, single hop) terms. (The zeroth order term makes no contribution of K f as long as i f) In this weak coupling limit, the expression for Pjf (t) can be expressed as88... [Pg.194]

The corresponding system of rate equations, and their exact solution, assuming that only A is present initially, is shown in Scheme 4.1 the expressions for [B] t and [C] t do not apply when the two rate constants are identical (k = ), an improbable situation in chemical processes. [Pg.81]

When U(r) / 0, the approximate expression for k t) behaves correctly at t —> oo, and the diffusion-controlled rate constant becomes... [Pg.239]

Thus the rate constant can be expressed in terms of the three quantities and Fc all of which are temperature dependent. These expressions, developed from Troe s adiabatic channel model, have the great virtue of sufficient complexity to express adequately the variation of k with T and p, but simple enough for ready programming, and hence, of being convenient for modelling purposes. It is quite possible to use other ways of expressing evaluated data for decomposition/combination reactions but none are so useful. For example, Tsang and Hampson have adopted a rather different approach, described in Section 3.4, but their methods do not lead to a simple analytical expression for k(T, [A/]). [Pg.269]

The relationship between Ej and AH ° is obtained by differentiating the Arrhenius relationship and substituting (1) of Table 2.2. Thus the Arrhenius equation, predicting a linear relationship between In k and 1/T, is confirmed by the ACT treatment. The expression for k in terms of A5 ° and is ... [Pg.75]

The equation (33.16) is the rigorous form of a relationship originally derived by J. H. van t Hoff it is consequently sometimes referred to as the van t Hoff equation. It is to be understood, of course, that the particular standard states chosen for the activities of the reactants and products in the expression for K, i.e., in equation (32.7), must also apply to AH , as defined above. [Pg.289]

As you approach the problem, you need to think about what it is you are calculating. The solution is 0.10 M acetic acid solution. That means that 0.10 mol acetic acid was dissolved in enough water to make 1.00 liter of solution. Some of that 0.10 mol has dissociated, however. Because we don t know how much, we have to determine the amount using the expression for K. This will allow us to determine the concentrations, and eventually the pH. We will begin by setting up a chart like the ones you used in the last chapter. [Pg.328]

Figure 47. Top Experimental fluorescence decays corresponding to the excitation and detection of the S, - Og band of jet-cooled r-stilbene expansion orifice 70 fim, 75 psig Ne backing pressure, nozzle T 150°C, laser-to-nozzle distance 3 mm. Bottom Fluorescence anisotropies r(t). The experimental trace was obtained directly from the parallel and perpendicular decays at the top of the figure using the expression for r(t). The upper theoretical trace was obtained from decays calculated for an asymmetric top (rotational constants 2.678,0.262, and 0.250 GHz) at 5 K with convolution of the experimental response function accounted for. The bottom trace was calculated from the bottom two decays (symmetric top) of Fig. 46. Figure 47. Top Experimental fluorescence decays corresponding to the excitation and detection of the S, - Og band of jet-cooled r-stilbene expansion orifice 70 fim, 75 psig Ne backing pressure, nozzle T 150°C, laser-to-nozzle distance 3 mm. Bottom Fluorescence anisotropies r(t). The experimental trace was obtained directly from the parallel and perpendicular decays at the top of the figure using the expression for r(t). The upper theoretical trace was obtained from decays calculated for an asymmetric top (rotational constants 2.678,0.262, and 0.250 GHz) at 5 K with convolution of the experimental response function accounted for. The bottom trace was calculated from the bottom two decays (symmetric top) of Fig. 46.
The expression for N t, E) in equation (A3.12.67) has been used to study [103.104] how the Porter-Thomas P k) affects the collision-averaged monoenergetic unimolecular rate constant k (Si, E) [105] and the Lindemann-Hinshelwood unimolecular rate constant T) [47]. The Porter-Thomas P k) makes k, E) pressure... [Pg.1034]

This is possible in precisely the same fashion as above for N(E). Thus just as Eq. (34) is the rigorous quantum expression for N(E) that corresponds to the classical expression Eq. (9), the following expression for k(T) is the quantum version which corresponds to the classical expression, Eq. (1), for k(T) ... [Pg.408]

Given that the apparent rate constants for complex reaction systems might strongly deviate from Lindemann-type rate expressions, the concept of correcting the Lindemann expression for k(T, p) leads to problems. Based on this conclusion, Venkatesh et al. [110] proposed the use of a purely mathematical approximation, Chebyshev polynomials, to represent the temperature and pressure dependences of apparent rate constants. Briefly, a Chebyshev polynomial of degree i— is defined as... [Pg.177]

This can be verified by substituting the expression for v t) into the differential equation model and performing the indicated operations. The fact that v t) can be shown to have this form indicates that it is possible for this circuit to sustain oscillatory voltage and current waveforms indefinitely. When the parametric expression for v(t) is substituted into the differential equation model the value of co that is compatible with the solution of the equation is revealed to be ct) = l/.-/(LC). This is an example of the important fact that the frequency at which an electrical circuit exhibits resonance is determined by the physical value of its components. The remaining parameters ofv(t), K, and (p are determined by the initial energy stored in the circuit (i.e., the boundary conditions for the solution to the differential equation model of the behavior of the circuit s voltage). [Pg.16]

The simplest line-of-centres (LOC) collision model and the angle-dependent line-of-centres (ADLOC) collision model predict [5] expressions for the reaction cross section which are proportional to (E-E )/E and (E-E ) /E, respectively, yielding rate expressions like Eq. (4) for k(T) with n = 0.5 in the LOC case and n = 1.5 for the ADLOC model. In the TST expression for k(T), the pre-exponential part (A ) can be written as... [Pg.192]

In this formulation of the TST expression for k(T), the vibrational partition functions are referred to the appropriate zero-point levels, so that, within the harmonic approximation, vib n j (1 - exp(—toj/ksT)) the product is over the s vibrations of the species. [Pg.28]

Now consider the effect of temperature on K itself At first, this problem looks troublesome because both T and AjG appear in the expression for K. However, as we show in the following Justification, the effect of temperature can be expressed very simply as the van t Hoff equation. ... [Pg.150]

The expressions for K, K y are those given by scientists, and jJ., [1 have had functional fits according to the data by researchers The dif-fusivity d[t,P given by scientists and the latent heat of evaporation given by,... [Pg.247]


See other pages where The Expression for K T is mentioned: [Pg.657]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.657]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.552]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.130]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.253]   


SEARCH



Expression for

TS expression

© 2024 chempedia.info