Symmetry time-reversal transformation

Operators that induce transformations in space satisfy eq. (2) and are therefore unitary operators with the property / T = 1. An operator that satisfies eq. (3) is said to be antiunitary. In contrast to spatial symmetry operators, the time-reversal operator is anti-unitary. Let U denote a unitary operator and let T denote an antiunitary operator. 

We now remove the restriction that // is real, introduce the symbol 0 for the time-reversal symmetry operator, and choose t0 = 0. Now Qip is the transformed function which has the... 

The term irreversibility has two different uses and has been applied to different arrows of time. Although these arrows are not related, they seem to be connected to the intuitive notion of causality. Mostly, the word irreversibility refers to the direction of the time evolution of a system. Irreversibility is also used to describe noninvariance of the changes with respect to the nonlinear time reversal transformation. For changes that generate space-time symmetry transformations, irreversibility implies the impossibility to create a state that evolves backward in time. Therefore, irreversibility is time asymmetry due to a preferred direction of time evolution. 

Time reversal transformation, t - — t This is like space inversion and most likely space-time inversion is a single symmetry that reflects the local euclidean topology of space, observed as the conservation of matter. 

The subscript C/ in (4.1.45) stands for unitary since the system Hamiltonian is invariant under general unitary transformations in case all antiunitary symmetries are broken. The effects of time reversal symmetry breaking on the level statistics were recently investigated experimentally by So et al. (1995) and Stoffregen et al. (1995) by measuring the resonance spectrum of quasi-two-dimensional microwave cavities in the presence of time reversal breaking elements such as ferrites and directional couplers. These experiments are of considerable relevance for quantum mechanics since quasi-two-dimensional microwave cavities are generally considered to be excellent models for two-dimensional quantum billiards. 

An important property of time correlation functions is derived from the time reversal symmetry of the equations of motion. The time reversal operation, that is, inverting simultaneously the sign of time and of all momenta, reverses the direction of the system s trajectory in phase space. At the moment the transformation is made each dynamical variable is therefore transformed according to... 

Even though the spin orbitals obtained from (2.23) in general do not have the full symmetry of the Hamiltonian, they may have some symmetry properties. In order to study these Fukutome considered the transformation properties of solutions of (2.24) with respect to spin rotations and time reversal. Whatever spatial symmetry the system under consideration has, its Hamiltonian always commutes with these operators. As we will see, the effective one-electron Hamiltonian (2.25) in general only commutes with some of them, since it depends on these solutions themselves via the Fock-Dirac matrix. 

The matrices and are defined in perfect analogy with (239). Once again we see the structure of the gradient vector e /, but with the reference Hamiltonian Hq replaced by the two-index transformed Hamiltonian. To determine the vector structure of with respect to hermiticity and time reversal symmetry it suffices to look at the corresponding two-index transformed Hamiltonian... 

This transformation12 is called the time-reversal transformation. A property that transforms like Eq. (11.5.1) is said to have definite time-reversal symmetry and y is called the signature of A under time reversal. Let us now investigate the consequences of this kind of symmetry. We proceed by proving a certain set of theorems. These theorems only apply to the set A if all A in the set have definite time-reversal symmetry, which will be the case in all the applications. 

It follows from Eq. (12.2.2) that -8aaj(q, t) transforms to eig/lz Saaf(q, t) under the arbitrary translation Az along the z direction, that Saaf(q, t) has even time reversal symmetry, and that 5aaf(q, t) transforms to 5aaf(—q, t) under inversion symmetry. 

We therefore surmise from time-reversal symmetry and the transformation properties of A and A2 under inversion that the matrix of kinetic coefficients can be written as... 

Here the summation is performed over the repeating indexes. A is the transformation matrix with components Ay (ij= 1,2,3) and determinant det(A) = 1 the factor Ir denotes either the presence (tr=l) or the absence (tr = 0) of the time-reversal operation coupled to the space transformation Ay. For the case when the matrices A represent all the generating elements of the material point symmetry group (considered hereinafter) the identity = dY should be valid for nonzero components of the piezotensors. 

According to the time-reversal selection rules, time-odd interactions with a magnetic field will be based on the symmetrized square. The spin-operator of the Zeeman Hamiltonian transforms as Tig, which is indeed included in the symmetrized square. The present case is, however, special since the Tig irrep occurs twice in the product. The multiplicity separation cannot be achieved on the basis of symmetrization since both Tig irreps appear in the symmetrized part. One way to distinguish the two products is through the subduction process from spherical symmetry. The addition rules of angular momenta give rise to... 

In the two-component case, the setup of the relativistic one-electron Hamiltonian is much slower than in the scalar-relativistic case. The formal ratio of two-component to scalar-relativistic transformation is 32. The doubled dimension of matrices contributes a factor of eight and the multiplication of complex numbers contributes another factor of four. The actual ratios for different relativistic approaches match the formal ratio. The computation time of the X2C Hamiltonian is very close to that of DKH6. DKH2 is ten times faster than X2C in this two-component case. The computational cost for the calculation of the relativistic one-electron Hamiltonian shows a dramatic increase from scalar to two-component, whereas the SCF time is only slightly increased. This is due to several factors. The required primitive repulsion integrals are the same as in the SCF stage, the electron density is always real, and time-reversal symmetry had been used in the two-component SCF calculations. The two-component relativistic Hamiltonian construction is now the bottleneck of the whole calculation. If the DLU approximation is employed, the computation time of the relativistic transformation is again dramatically reduced. 

We have previously commented on the Lorentz invariance of the Dirac equation. Considering that this places time and space coordinates on an equal footing, it may seem inconsistent to discuss transformations in spin space and only. We therefore now turn our attention to time transformations. With only one coordinate, there are only two possible transformations translation and reversal. Translation will be treated in connection with a discussion of the Lorentz transformations in the next section. Here, we will consider the symmetry of the Dirac equation under time reversal. 

One obvious problem with this bispinor form is that it does not carry time-reversal symmetry. The product of two fermion functions should transform as a boson and thus be symmetric with respect to time reversal. The simple products of spin functions clearly do not do this (aa) = fifi, not aa. This problem can be remedied by making linear combinations of the primitive spin functions. Thus we can change basis to... 

---