Symmetry constraint, approximations

Eq. (22) have been derived from the variation principle alone (given the structure of H) they contain only the single model approximation of Eq. (9) the typically chemical idea that the electronic structure of a complex many-electron system can be (quantitatively as well as qualitatively) understood in terms of the interactions among conceptually identifiable separate electron groups. In the discussion of the exact solutions of the Schrodinger equation for simple systems the operators which commute with the relevant H ( symmetries ) play a central role. We therefore devote the next section to an examination of the effect of symmetry constraints on the solutions of (22). 

The simple orbital basis expansion method which is used in the implementation of most models of molecular electronic structure consists of expanding each R as a linear combination of determinants of a set of (usually) atom-centred functions of one or two standard forms. In particular most qualitative and semi-quantitative theories restrict the terms in this expansion to consist of the (approximate) occupied atomic orbitals of the constituent atoms of the molecule. There are two types of symmetry constraint implicit in this technique. 

In examining numerical approximations it is as well to bear in mind the general qualitative conclusion of our brief examination of symmetry constraints. In broad terms the result was the simpler the model the more severe the effect of any constraint on the variation principle. This result cannot be carried over directly and used in numerical work since numerical approximation schemes can rarely be brought into a sufficiently coherent logical and mathematical form for analysis. Nevertheless it seems likely that this result can be used as a guideline — a rule of thumb . We therefore expect that the imposition of formal constraints and consistency requirements (derived from a higher level of approximation or the exact solution) on numerical approximation schemes is likely to have far-reaching consequences — particularly on the... 

We have not mentioned open shells of electrons in our general considerations but then we have not specifically mentioned closed shells either. Certainly our examples are all closed shell but this choice simply reflects our main area of interest valence theory. The derivations and considerations of constraints in the opening sections are independent of the numbers of electrons involved in the system and, in particular, are independent of the magnetic properties of the molecules concerned simply because the spin variable does not occur in our approximate Hamiltonian. Nevertheless, it is traditional to treat open and closed shells of electrons by separate techniques and it is of some interest to investigate the consequences of this dichotomy. The independent-electron model (UHF - no symmetry constraints) is the simplest one to investigate we give below an abbreviated discussion. 

Density functional methods are competitive with the above traditional wave function methods for numerous applications such as the computation of ground-state PES. A few applications of transition metal photochemistry have been proposed on the basis of the A-SCF approach implying several approximations on the excited-state reaction-path definition by symmetry constraints not always appropriate in a coordinate driving scheme. Excited-state gradients have been recently implemented in DFT for various functionals, the feasibility of the approach having been tested for small molecules... 

It is not always possible to fulfil symmetry constraints of this kind and stay within the single-determinant model. In fact the general case involves a wavefunc-tion of several determinants which form a linear combination with coefficients fixed by the symmetry constraint. This fact means, unfortunately, that many of the familiar properties of the single-determinant model no longer apply in particular the idea that the orbital energies are approximations to the ionisation energies of the molecule is lost. In general, therefore, it will be necessary to use a multi-determinant approach to these constrained models of electronic structure, and explicit treatment is deferred until the shell model of molecular electronic structure is discussed. ... 

When dealing with anions, always be alert to the possibility that a combination of symmetry constraints or basis set limitations will generate SCF approximations to non-existent HF solutions . 

Unfortunately, the molecular spectra based on the eigen-problem (36) are neither directly nor completely solved without specific atoms-in-molecule and/or symmetry constraints and approximation. As such, at the mono-electronic level of approximation, the Schrodinger equation (36) is rewritten under the so-called independent-electron problem ... 

Let us consider now a baryon made of different quarks. We use the Jacobi coordinates of eq. (3.52) and the corresponding reduced mass fi = 2m m2l(m + m2). If two quarks are identical, as in A, 2 or H type of baryons, or almost identical, as s and u in they are assigned to labels 1 or 2. This helps to enforce the exact or approximate symmetry constraints. The hyperspherical treatment of... 

The matrix element in eq. (143) is valid for transitions between two crystal-field levels. Because of the radial integrals, the calculation of the matrix element is very tedious and can in fact only be done if some approximations are made. Axe (1963) treated the quantities Aiaj3(k,X) in eq. (143) as adjustable parameters. In this expression, X is equal to 2, 4 or 6, and k is restricted to values of Ail. The values of q are determined by crystal-field symmetry constraints and lie between 0 and k. This parametrization scheme was used by Axe for the intensity analysis of the fluorescence spectrum of Eu(C2H5S04)3 9H20. Porcher and Caro (1978) introduced the notation Bxki for the intensity parameters ... 

We first survey, in Section 4.1, the more important characteristic properties of the exact solution to the time-independent Schrodinger equation for a molecular electronic system and relate these characteristics to those of approximate wave functions. More detailed treatments of some of these topics follow in the subsequent sections the variation principle in Section 4.2, size-extensivity in Section 4.3 and symmetry constraints in Section 4.4. 

The most famous case concerns the symmetry breaking in the Hartree-Fock approximation. The phenomenon appeared on elementary problems, such as H2, when the so-called unrestricted Hartree-Fock algorithms were tried. The unrestricted Hartree-Fock formalism, using different orbitals for a and p electrons, was first proposed by G. Berthier [5] in 1954 (and immediately after J.A. Pople [6] ) for problems where the number of a andp electrons were different. This formulation takes the freedom to deviate from the constraints of being an eigenfunction. 

The constraints at Eqs. (65) and (68) are important checks on the accuracy of (non-variationally derived) approximate potentials, as they are usually not fulfilled by approximate potentials except in those cases where the fulfillment of these constraint is caused for symmetry reasons such as the spherical symmetry in atoms with a nondegenerate ground state. In the case of molecules these constraints will in general not be equal to zero for non-variationally derived potentials. 

---