Surface structure modification characterization

The catalytic role of the oxide surface can be seen in terms of forming or providing oxygen in an activated state, which then permits a new reaction pathway characterized by a lower energy barrier, with the other reactants either in the gas phase or as an adsorbed species on the surface. Such reactions may modify both the electronic levels and the surface structure of the oxide, but it should be kept in mind that for a catalyst such modification will reach a dynamic equilibrium in which restoration of electrons and replenishment of vacancies by oxygen must balance their removal by reaction products. In this sense, many of the model systems studied are unrealistic since the changes to the surface are irreversible. 

Surface characterization includes also the study of the modification of a surface under cathodic load or after some pretreatments. The presence of residual surface oxides can explain some observations otherwise inexplicable. Activation in situ usually results in composite structures which are difficult to identify by X-ray, and may contain metallic and non-metallic components. Particularly crucial is the case of the surface structure of glassy metals or amorphous alloys. 

The effect of surface water and air humidity on the hydrolysis of APTS molecules adsorbed on the silica surface may be characterized as follows. Short time exposures to humid air cause partial hydrolysis of the modified layer. Extensive hydrolysis is only caused by surface adsorbed water. Hydrolyzed aminosilane molecules at the surface condense to form an aminopropylpolysiloxane layer. Only when all three modification stages (pretreating, loading, curing) are performed in completely dry conditions, hydrolysis of ethoxy groups can be prevented. The structures formed under the various modification conditions are summarized in figure 9.5. 

As in the case of alumina, surface structures have been characterized mainly by the hydroxylation/dehydroxylation behavior of the two modifications. The first infrared spectra of surface OH groups were reported by Yates (132), by Lewis and Parfitt (133), and later by Criado et al. (134). 

The blood-materials interactions section contains a review article dealing with surface characterization. Consideration of the surface structure of biomaterials is critical to every study in this volume. This section contains 16 chapters dealing with the choice of in vivo and in vitro methods of biomaterials evaluation, biomaterials selection and modification, and cellular interactions with candidate surfaces. Individual papers dealing with the use of dogs, baboons, and goats for in vivo blood-materials evaluation can be found together with in vitro methods. There are also several contributions on polyurethanes, which are prime candidates for use in blood contacting devices. 

The surface characterization tools that provide qualitative and quantitative information about wettability, morphology, and elemental and molecular surface chemistry are outlined in this section. These tools can provide a comprehensive view of the surface (10-100 A) from which a model of interfacial behavior can be developed. The model of the working surface can be utilized to understand fundamental structure-property relations and thus used in general problem solving. It is important to remember that no one surface tool is an end in itself [28j. It is important to correlate information from all sources to build a working model of behavior. The understanding of the surface structure allows one to apply the appropriate surface modification and to follow the modification as a function of polymer processing. Thus, assessment of the real-world surface chemistry in a deliverable biomedical product is necessary and prudent. 

In the past [4-6] it was common to characterize amphiphiles according to their major performance in food systems (1) emulsification and stabilization, (2) protein interactions, (3) polysaccharide complexation, (4) aeration, and (5) crystal structure modification of fats. Such classifications correlate the surfactant chemical structure to its interaction (chemical or physical) with substrates such as fats, polysaccharides, and proteins. It was confirmed fhat certain surfactants interact molecularly with macromolecules, forming complexes and/or hybrids, and alter the macromolecular behavior at the interface. Such activity is an important new contribution of cosurfactants to the surface performance of other surfactants [7]. Such interactions are sometimes a very important contribution of amphiphiles to food systems. 

---