Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface potential surfactant effect

At the shear plane, fluid motion relative to the particle surface is 2ero. For particles with no adsorbed surfactant or ionic atmosphere, this plane is at the particle surface. Adsorbed surfactant or ions that are strongly attracted to the particle, with their accompanying solvent, prevent Hquid motion close to the particle, thus moving the shear plane away from the particle surface. The effective potential at the shear plane is called the 2eta potential, It is smaller than the potential at the surface, but because it is difficult to determine 01 To usual assumption is that /q is effectively equal to which can be... [Pg.545]

The rate constants for the reaction of a pyridinium Ion with cyanide have been measured in both a cationic and nonlonic oil in water microemulsion as a function of water content. There is no effect of added salt on the reaction rate in the cationic system, but a substantial effect of ionic strength on the rate as observed in the nonionic system. Estimates of the ionic strength in the "Stern layer" of the cationic microemulsion have been employed to correct the rate constants in the nonlonic system and calculate effective surface potentials. The ion-exchange (IE) model, which assumes that reaction occurs in the Stern layer and that the nucleophile concentration is determined by an ion-exchange equilibrium with the surfactant counterion, has been applied to the data. The results, although not definitive because of the ionic strength dependence, indicate that the IE model may not provide the best description of this reaction system. [Pg.175]

It is noted that the molecular interaction parameter described by Eq. 52 of the improved model is a function of the surfactant concentration. Surprisingly, the dependence is rather significant (Eig. 9) and has been neglected in the conventional theories that use as a fitting parameter independent of the surfactant concentration. Obviously, the resultant force acting in the inner Helmholtz plane of the double layer is attractive and strongly influences the adsorption of the surfactants and binding of the counterions. Note that surface potential f s is the contribution due to the adsorption only, while the experimentally measured surface potential also includes the surface potential of the solvent (water). The effect of the electrical potential of the solvent on adsorption is included in the adsorption constants Ki and K2. [Pg.50]

Another aspect of polysorbates is that they are inherently susceptible to oxidative degradation. Often, as raw materials, they contain sufficient quantities of peroxides to cause oxidation of protein residue side chains, especially methionine (59). The potential for oxidative damage arising from the addition of stabilizer emphasizes the point that the lowest effective concentrations of excipients should be used in formulations. For surfactants, the effective concentration for a given protein will depend on the mechanism of stabilization. It has been postulated that if the mechanism of surfactant stabilization is related to preventing surface-denaturation, the effective concentration will be around the detergent s critical micellar concentration. Conversely, if the mechanism of stabilization is associated with specific protein-detergent interactions, the effective surfactant concentration will be related to the protein concentration and the stoichiometry of the interaction (39). [Pg.301]

The interfacial tension decreases with increasing amount of surface potential. The reason is the increased interfacial excess of counterions in the electric double layer. In accordance with the Gibbs adsorption isotherms, the interfacial tension must decrease with increasing interfacial excess. At charged interfaces ions have an effect similarly to surfactants at liquid surfaces. [Pg.60]

The micelle formulation approach often possesses disadvantages such as its toxicity associated with surfactants even at relatively low concentrations. In general, nonionic surfactants have the least toxic effects. Cremophor EL produces hypersensitivity reactions in human and animals (Jonkman-de Vries et al., 1996). Tween-80 is also believed to cause acute hepatitis and renal failure (Uchegbu and Florence, 1996). On intravenous administration, owing to their surface activity, surfactant molecules have the potential to penetrate and disrupt biological membranes and can be hemolytic (Ten Tije et al., 2003). Often the absorption capacity of the micelle is too small and the extent of the... [Pg.120]

Over the last decade the surface force technique has been used to probe the nature of the forces which atomically smooth surfaces exert on each other in different solutions [32]. The effect of cationic surfactant adsorption on the surface forces, inferred from the fitted surface potentials and the measured adhesion data, has been well characterized for mica and silica glass surfaces [33-37]. [Pg.799]

The importance of electrostatic retardation increases with the surface potential, i.e. with the adsorption surfactant molecules. Especially in some practical systems of high background electrolyte, only at densely packed adsorption layers the electrostatic retardation will set in. This state of adsorption has not been taken into consideration so far. With increasing background electrolyte concentration counterions build the Stem layer. The charge of the adsorption layer is compensated partially by the diffuse layer and the Stem layer (Eq. 2.5) which decrease with the increased amount of counterions in the Stem layer. Simultaneously, the Stem potential is lowered and the electrostatic retardation becomes less effective. This aspect was discussed already by Kretzschmar et al. (1980). Consequently, the electrostatic retardation can exist in NaCl solution while it can disappear under certain conditions in CaCl2 solutions. [Pg.258]


See other pages where Surface potential surfactant effect is mentioned: [Pg.228]    [Pg.335]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.1557]    [Pg.546]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.356]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.2979]    [Pg.1557]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.632]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.181]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.350 , Pg.351 ]




SEARCH



Effective surface potential

Surface Surfactant

Surfactant effectiveness

Surfactants, effects

© 2024 chempedia.info