Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surface dipolar potential, effect

A (j) is the potential drop due to the net free charge at the interface is the dipolar potential due to the metal phase, more specifically, to the electron overspill that occurs at the surface of the metal finally, is the dipolar potential due to the solution phase which arises because of the orientation of solvent molecules at the interface due to their proximity to the metal, and because of the unequal distances of closest approach of the cations and anions to the interface. is defined in the opposite direction to because the concept of the dipolar potential originates at the condensed phase vacuum interface where the definition of the potential drop is always from vacuum to the condensed phase. The dipolar potential arises for the same reasons as the surface potential x at the metal vacuum interface. However, it is not the same because of the effect that the proximity of the molecules and ions of the solution phase have on the electron overspill. [Pg.536]

Another model which combined a model for the solvent with a jellium-type model for the metal electrons was given by Badiali et a/.83 The metal electrons were supposed to be in the potential of a jellium background, plus a repulsive pseudopotential averaged over the jellium profile. The solvent was modeled as a collection of equal-sized hard spheres, charged and dipolar. In this model, the distance of closest approach of ions and molecules to the metal surface at z = 0 is fixed in terms of the molecular and ionic radii. The effect of the metal on the solution is thus that of an infinitely smooth, infinitely high barrier, as well as charged surface. The solution species are also under the influence of the electronic tail of the metal, represented by an exponential profile. [Pg.82]

Section IV is devoted to excitons in a disordered lattice. In the first subsection, restricted to the 2D radiant exciton, we study how the coherent emission is hampered by such disorder as thermal fluctuation, static disorder, or surface annihilation by surface-molecule photodimerization. A sharp transition is shown to take place between coherent emission at low temperature (or weak extended disorder) and incoherent emission of small excitonic coherence domains at high temperature (strong extended disorder). Whereas a mean-field theory correctly deals with the long-range forces involved in emission, these approximations are reviewed and tested on a simple model case the nondipolar triplet naphthalene exciton. The very strong disorder then makes the inclusion of aggregates in the theory compulsory. From all this study, our conclusion is that an effective-medium theory needs an effective interaction as well as an effective potential, as shown by the comparison of our theoretical results with exact numerical calculations, with very satisfactory agreement at all concentrations. Lastly, the 3D case of a dipolar exciton with disorder is discussed qualitatively. [Pg.7]

Neutral molecules are also interesting as adsorbates, because they influence or participate in faradaic processes (2-, 6-8, 13, 16-19, 34). They can be detected and studied by the methods we have outlined above (see Problem 13.6). An interesting aspect of their behavior is that adsorption from aqueous solutions is often effective only at potentials relatively near the PZC. The usual rationale for this phenomenon rests on a recognition that adsorption of a neutral molecule requires the displacement of water molecules from the surface. When the interface is strongly polarized, the water is tightly bound and its displacement by a less dipolar substance is energetically unfavorable. Adsorption can take... [Pg.556]

The standard way to overcome the surface effects which result from the finite size of systems studied in numerical simulations is the use of periodic boundary conditions. With this requirement, systems of 1000-10000 particles interacting by potentials having a range of the order of a few partide diameters are sufficient to perform simulations where the bias on the computation data, induced by the finite size effects is at an acceptable level of 1%. However, when the interactions between the particles are of Coulombic and/or dipolar types, their long range cannot be neglected because it is at the origin... [Pg.165]

The use of periodic boundary conditions is not the only way to remove surface effects in finite charged or dipolar systems. An alternative is to use for the simulation volume the 3D surface S3 of a four-dimensional (4D) sphere (hypersphere) which has no boundary [19-21]. The specific physical properties of the charged systems are preserved if the charges interact by a potential solution of the Poisson equation which for S3 is... [Pg.169]


See other pages where Surface dipolar potential, effect is mentioned: [Pg.173]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.586]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.2242]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.556]    [Pg.605]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.510]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.2242]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.463]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.1857]    [Pg.421]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.533]   


SEARCH



Dipolar effects

Dipolar surfaces

Effective surface potential

© 2024 chempedia.info