Surface area, creating adsorption

Fabrication processing of these materials is highly complex, particularly for materials created to have interfaces in morphology or a microstructure [4—5], for example in co-fired multi-layer ceramics. In addition, there is both a scientific and a practical interest in studying the influence of a particular pore microstructure on the motional behavior of fluids imbibed into these materials [6-9]. This is due to the fact that the actual use of functionalized ceramics in industrial and biomedical applications often involves the movement of one or more fluids through the material. Research in this area is therefore bi-directional one must characterize both how the spatial microstructure (e.g., pore size, surface chemistry, surface area, connectivity) of the material evolves during processing, and how this microstructure affects the motional properties (e.g., molecular diffusion, adsorption coefficients, thermodynamic constants) of fluids contained within it. 

That the reduction takes place at the surface, receives support from an experiment in which the extent of reduction of various Fe oxides by Shewanella alga after 30 days was linearly correlated with the SAbet the exception was 2-line ferrihydrite for which a surface area of 600 m /g had to be assumed in order to fit the relationship (Roden Zachara, 1996). Although experimental (BET) surface areas of ferrihydrite are substantially lower than 600 m /g, calculated values based on particle size as well as those determined from ligand adsorption experiments (see Table 5.1) are in this range. Dissolved Fe was found to create a lag phase in the reduction process (in contrast to the behaviour in inorganic systems) because Fe is adsorbed at the cell surface (Liu et al. 2001). This effect can be overcome by complexing the Fe (e. g. 

Weidler, P.G. (1997) BET sample pretreatment of synthetic ferrihydrite and its influence on the determination of surface area and porosity. J. Porous Materials 4 165-169 Weidler, P.G. Degovics, G. Laggner, P. (1998) Surface roughness created by acidic dissolution of synthetic goethite monitored with SAXS and N2 adsorption isotherms. J. Colloid Interface Sd. 197 1-8... 

The main difference between a solid and a liquid is that the molecules in a solid are not mobile. Therefore, as Gibbs already noted, the work required to create new surface area depends on the way the new solid surface is formed [ 121. Plastic deformations are possible for solids too. An example is the cleavage of a crystal. Plastic deformations are described by the surface tension y also called superficial work, The surface tension may be defined as the reversible work at constant elastic strain, temperature, electric field, and chemical potential required to form a unit area of new surface. It is a scalar quantity. The surface tension is usually measured in adhesion and adsorption experiments. 

Clearly, this is the direction in which further fundamental studies should be oriented. For example, it will be interesting to find out whether much higher surface coverages can be accomplished on a carbon whose maximum number of (cation-exchangeable) adsorption sites, e.g., 3 mmol COO /g C, is not only created but made electrostatically accessible by adjusting the solution chemistry. Under these conditions, for example, the theoretical uptake of a divalent cation is 1.5 mmol/g, which translates into 450 mVg, which in turn is a large fraction of the total surface area. This is obtained by assuming a radius of 0.4 nm for a hydrated divalent cation, which is usual for heavy metals [309], Indeed, in the study of Cr(IlI) adsorption by activated carbon MO (see Table 3), the surface covered by a monolayer of the adsorbed eations was 196 mVg on a sample whose Nt and CO2 surface areas were 164 and 537 mVg, respectively. 

---