Summary of the decision framework

In this section, I have reviewed the decision process model Latan6 and Darley proposed as a sequence of choices people make before actively caring on behalf of ano er person. Although developed to xmderstand the bystander effect in emergency situations, this decision framework is certainly relevant for proactive situations and for each type of actively caring behavior defined in this chapter (direct vs. indirect, and environment-focused, person-focused or behavior-focused). 

According to an interpretation based on our xmderstanding of tixe power of consequences, people resisted taking responsibility because they perceived that it could mean more trouble—or potential harm—than it was worth. It was safer to assume tixat someone else more capable would intervene. According to this consequence model, people hesitated to intervene because they perceived more potential costs than benefits, not because they were apathetic or failed to interpret a need to take personal responsibility. 

Old man, I see you slumped in the gutter, looking half dead. I realize that you need help. Will I be the one  

What will it cost me if I help Maybe you re drunk and will slobber aU over me. Maybe you ll get surly. What if I make things worse and am held liable Call that 10 cost points. 

Besides, if 1 just pass by. I ll be on time for my job interview and will probably get the position. Rewarding indeed — at least 5 reward p oints, which I ll lose if 1 help. 

---