Substrate binding sequential model

This concerted model assumes furthermore that the symmetry of the molecule is conserved so that the activity of all its subunits is either equally low or equally high, that is, all structural changes are concerted. Subsequently Daniel Koshland, University of California, Berkeley, postulated a sequential model in which each subunit is allowed independently to change its tertiary structure on substrate binding. In this model tertiary structural changes in the subunit with bound ligand alter the interactions of this... 

In the sequential model, each binding of substrate increases the affinity of the other active sites (Fig 6.15). 

Two theoretical models that attempt to explain the behavior of allosteric enzymes are the concerted model and the sequential model. In the concerted (or symmetry) model, it is assumed that the enzyme exists in only two states T(aut) and R(elaxed). Substrates and activators bind more easily to the R conformation, whereas inhibitors favor the T conformation. The term concerted is applied to this model because the conformations of all the protein s protomers are believed to change simultaneously when the first effector binds. (This rapid concerted change in conformation maintains the protein s overall symmmetry.) The binding of an activator shifts the equilibrium in favor of the R form. An inhibitor shifts the equilibrium toward the T conformation. 

Q Sequential model of cooperative binding of substrate S to an allosteric enzyme. Binding substrate to one subunit induces the other subunit to adopt the R state, which has a higher affinity for substrate. 

What is the sequential model for allosteric behavior In the sequential model, the binding of substrate... 

The sequential model can explain negative cooperativity, because a substrate binding to the T form could induce other subunits to switch to the T form, thereby reducing binding affinity. 

Cooperative substrate binding results in sigmoidal v versus [S] curves (Fig. 8.1). The Michaelis-Menten model is therefore not appMcable to cooperative enzymes. Two major equihbrium models have evolved to describe the catalytic behavior of cooperative enzymes the sequential interaction and concerted transition models. The reader should be aware that other models have also been developed, such as equilibrium association-dissociation models, as well as several kinetic models. These are not discussed in this chapter. 

The basic premise of the sequential interaction (SI) model is that significant changes in enzyme conformation take place upon substrate binding, which result in altered substrate binding affinities in the remaining active sites (Fig. 8.2). For the case of positive cooperativity, each substrate molecule that binds makes it easier for the next substrate molecule to bind. The resulting v versus [S] curve therefore displays a marked slope increase as a function of increasing substrate concentration. Upon saturation of the... 

Figure 11. Allosteric regulation A conformational change of the active site of an enzyme induced by reversible binding of an effector molecule (A). The model of Monod, Wyman, and Changeux (B) Cooperativity in the MWC is induced by a shift of the equilibrium between the T and R state upon binding of the receptor. Note that the sequential dissociation constants Kr and KR do not change. The T and R states of the enzyme differ in their catalytic properties for substrates. Both plots are adapted from Ref. 140. See color insert.

Fipire 4- 4 According to the concerted-symmetry model, an allosteric inhibitor binds preferendaliy to the T form. This causes the velocity curve to become more sigmoidal tvith a higher [S]gj. An allosteric activator mimics the substrate by binding preferentially to the R form. As a result, the velocity curve becomes less sigmoidal (hyperbolic at saturating activator) and fS]oi decreases. These observations can also be explained in terms of the sequential interaction model. 

---