Structurally correct sampling

Perhaps the most accurate calculations performed to date are the MP2, LMP2, and LCCSD(TO) calculations on chorismate mutase (CM) and para hydroxy-benzoate-hydroxylase (PHBH) (the L in the acronyms indicates that local approximations were used, and TO is an approximate triples correction).41,42 These are coupled-cluster calculations that account for the effects of conformational fluctuations through an averaging over multiple pathways (16 for CM and 10 for PHBH). Initial structures were sampled from semiempirical QM/MM dynamics, using B3LYP/MM optimized reaction pathways. 

Natural products are often isolated in amounts too small to permit the determination of their stereochemistry if we can get the gross structure correct then we are more than pleased. The stereochemistry is then found by stereo-controlled synthesis of the various possible isomers and comparison of authentic synthetic samples with the natural product. The importance of precise and predictable stereochemistry is obvious here. 

Perform NVT molecular dynamics simulations for the TS-structure in solution. Only the reaction coordinate must be frozen so that all the other degrees of freedom, i.e., the solvent coordinates, but also the reactants translations, rotations and vibrations, are correctly sampled. 

Crystal Structure. The crystal stmcture of PVDC is fairly well estabhshed. Several unit cells have been proposed (63). The unit cell contains four monomer units with two monomer units per repeat distance. The calculated density, 1.96 g/cm, is higher than the experimental values, which are 1.80—1.94 g/cm at 25°C, depending on the sample. This is usually the case with crystalline polymers because samples of 100% crystallinity usually cannot be obtained. A dkect calculation of the polymer density from volume changes during polymerization yields a value of 1.97 g/cm (64). If this value is correct, the unit cell densities may be low. 

The comparison with experiment can be made at several levels. The first, and most common, is in the comparison of derived quantities that are not directly measurable, for example, a set of average crystal coordinates or a diffusion constant. A comparison at this level is convenient in that the quantities involved describe directly the structure and dynamics of the system. However, the obtainment of these quantities, from experiment and/or simulation, may require approximation and model-dependent data analysis. For example, to obtain experimentally a set of average crystallographic coordinates, a physical model to interpret an electron density map must be imposed. To avoid these problems the comparison can be made at the level of the measured quantities themselves, such as diffraction intensities or dynamic structure factors. A comparison at this level still involves some approximation. For example, background corrections have to made in the experimental data reduction. However, fewer approximations are necessary for the structure and dynamics of the sample itself, and comparison with experiment is normally more direct. This approach requires a little more work on the part of the computer simulation team, because methods for calculating experimental intensities from simulation configurations must be developed. The comparisons made here are of experimentally measurable quantities. 

Neutron diffraction is one of the most widely used techniques for the study of liquid structure. In the experiment, neutrons are elastically scattered off the nuclei in the sample and are detected at different scattering angles, typically 3° to 40°, for the purpose of measuring intermolecular structure whilst minimizing inelasticity corrections. The resultant scattering profile is then analyzed to provide structural information. 

Since the first structure determination by Wadsley [56] in 1952 there has been confusion about the correct cell dimensions and symmetry of natural as well of synthetic lithiophorite. Wadsley determined a monoclinic cell (for details see Table 3) with a disordered distribution of the lithium and aluminium atoms at their respective sites. Giovanoli et al. [75] found, in a sample of synthetic lithiophorite, that the unique monoclinic b-axis of Wadsley s cell setting has to tripled for correct indexing of the electron diffraction patterns. Additionally, they concluded that the lithium and aluminum atoms occupy different sites and show an ordered arrangement within the layers. Thus, the resulting formula given by Giovanelli et al. 

---