Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Steady escape rate

In the limit of an arbitrarily large reservoir N,V oo with n = N/V constant, the escape rate vanishes and a nonequilibrium steady state establishes itself in the diffusive slab. [Pg.120]

Hanggi and Mojtabai189 based their treatment on the generalized Fokker-Planck expression and demonstrated that the steady-state escape rate is given by the Grote and Hynes relationship (4.200) where the reactive frequency Ar is defined as the long-time limit given by... [Pg.126]

The objective is to find the steady-state escape rate k out of the potential well. Before presenting the Kramers solution it is important to note that for such a (quasi) steady state to be established, a clear separation of time scales has to exist, whereupon the escape occurs on a time scale much longer than all time scales associated with the motion inside the well. In particular this implies that the well should be deep enough (see below). [Pg.491]

If the well dynamics dominates the escape rate, we can now follow the development that leads from Eq. (2.32) to Eq. (2.39). In particular the steady-state energy distribution i, >( ) the steady-state energy flux, and the well dynamics dominated rates are [see Eqs. (2.37) to (2.39)]... [Pg.513]

With this realization we may evaluate the rate by considering an artificial situation in which A is maintained strictly constant (so the quasi-steady-state is replaced by a true one) by imposing a source inside the well and a sink outside it. This source does not have to be described in detail We simply impose the condition that the population (or probability) inside the well, far from the barrier region, is fixed, while outside the well we impose the condition that it is zero. Under such conditions the system will approach, at long time, a steady state in which dP/dt = 0 but J 0. The desired rate k is then given by J/A. We will use this strategy to calculate the escape rate associated with Eq. (14.44). [Pg.502]

We are now in a position to calculate the steady-state escape rate, given by... [Pg.507]

Assuming that we are dealing with a steady state, so that driifdt = 0 for all clusters sizes, Eq. (16) is a set of homogeneous linear equations that can be solved to obtain the steady state cluster concentrations /i2 g in terms of the monomer concentration i, the capture and escape rates c,- and e,-, and the demon rate constant ka. [Pg.205]

Finally, the rate constant for CPET, pet is still much smaller (orders of magnitude) than the diffusional cage escape rate constant, ke (Fig. 12.14). Using a steady-state approximation, with cPEr[H ] << ke, the rate expression for CPET reduces to Eq. 12.14. [Pg.223]

In aqueous solution, the only well known experimental kinetic parameters are the rate coefficients (and in some cases their temperature dependence). To model this system as accurately as possible, the simulation also requires the microscopic parameters that describe diffusion and reaction. For diffusion controlled reactions, it was assumed the experimental rate constant obs = diff where dtff is Smoluchowski s steady state rate constant. From experimental findings [7], it is found that the spin statistical factor cts is 1 for reactions involving the hydroxyl radical. Therefore, for the OH -f- OH and OH -I- R reactions, the microscopic parameters were calculated from the expression diff = 4nD aa%fi, with as = 1 (based on the analysis done by Buxton and Elliot [26]) and being for identical reactants, but unity otherwise. From preliminary simulations it was found that both the phases and magnitude of the spin polarisation remained relatively the same using as = 0.25 for the OH -i- OH and OH + R reactions. Hence, the as parameter was found to be unimportant in explaining the observed E/A spin polarisation on the escaped 2-propanolyl radicals. [Pg.153]

In a continuous thickener, the area required for thickening must be such that the total solids flux (volumetric flowrate per unit area) at any level does not exceed the rate at which the solids can be transmitted downwards. If this condition is not met, solids will build up and steady-state operation will not be possible. If no solids escape in the overflow, this flux must be constant at all depths below the feed point. In the design of a thickener, it is therefore necessary to establish the concentration at which the total flux is a minimum in order to calculate the required area. [Pg.258]

The pairwise Brownian dynamics method is a combination of Brownian dynamics and the Smoluchowski [9] approach, and the effective rate constant is obtained from the reaction probability of a single molecule undergoingdiffusive motion in the neighbourhood of a stationary test molecule, so that only a pair of molecules is considered at a time. The method was first proposed by Northrup et al. [58], and the basis of the method is to obtain the steady state reaction flux (y) as the product of the first visit flux (Jq) to a surface (spherical) which envelopes the reaction zone and the probability (/ ) that a molecule starting from the surface reacts rather than escaping to the far field, that is, j = The first visit flux (Jq) is obtained analytically whereas... [Pg.806]


See other pages where Steady escape rate is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.313]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.500]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.292]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.207]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.936]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.644]    [Pg.501]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.126 ]




SEARCH



ESCAP

Escape rate

Steady rate

© 2024 chempedia.info