Spinors spatial components

We start by splitting each of the four spatial components of the spinor into a real and an imaginary part ... 

Two results follow immediately from this derivation. First, the four parts of the 2-spinor must fulfil the same relation, because we could equally well have done an elimination of the large component, analogously to what we did for the large component at the outset. The same argument could then have been carried through for Second, the symmetry of the time-reversed partner of follows easily because application of the time-reversal operator just corresponds to a spin flip, effectively swapping the two complex spatial components of the 2-spinor ... 

The time-dependent Schrodinger equation (2.43) presents a serious problem from the point of view of relativity theory it does not treat space and time in a symmetric way, because second-order derivatives of the wavefunction with respect to spatial coordinates are accompanied by a first-order derivative with respect to time. One way out, as actually proposed by Schrodinger and later known as the Klein-Gordon equation, would be to have also second-order derivatives with respect to time. However, that would lead to a total probability for the particle under consideration which would be a function of time, and to a variation of the number of particles of the universe (which, at the time, was completely unacceptable). In 1928, Dirac sought the solution for this problem, by accepting first-order derivation in the case of time and forcing the spatial derivatives to also be first order. This requires the wavefunction to have four components (functions of the spatial coordinates alone), often called a four-component spinor . 

In principle, all four-component molecular electronic structure codes work like their nonrelativistic relatives. This is, of course, due to the formal similarity of the theories where one-electron Schrbdinger operators are replaced by four-component Dirac operators enforcing a four-component spinor basis. Obviously, the spin symmetry must be treated in a different way, i.e. it is replaced by the time-reversal symmetry being the basis of Kramers theorem. Point group symmetry is replaced by the theory of double groups, since spatial and spin coordinates cannot be treated separately. 

However, for now, we shall not yet make use of this spatial connotation and just continue to consider x, y, z as the general variables of the Hamiltonian matrix. The two components of the space will be denoted as the spin functions a), P), which together form a spinor. The corresponding interaction operator can then be expressed as... 

A further approximation is apparent in this simple extension to spin-polarized systems, namely that the spin-quantization direction is independent of the spatial coordinate r. This assumption is often satisfied in crystalline solids (see, however. Ref. [26]), but is much less justified for spin-polarized clusters because their relatively low synunetry allows exotic solutions for the spin structures, in which the magnetic moments centered on different atoms point in different directions. To include this effect in the DFT model, it is necessary to introduce a two-component spinor description for the wave function [20, 27] ... 

Since spin-orbit coupling is not present in the nonrelativistic limit and the spin-orbit-coupling-free Hamiltonian commutes with the spin operators, the N KS spinors can be constructed from spatial 2-spinors ff tensorially multiplied with spin eigenfunctions a such that four-component spin orbitals ipi,x = cp1 OL and = respectively, are obtained. Then, the spin-orbit-coupling-free (SOfree) z-component of the magnetization resembles the nonrelativistic spin density. 

Another feature that emerges from these plots is the loss of nodal structure. Because the spin-up and spin-down components of each spinor have nodes in different places, the directional properties of the angular functions are smeared out compared with the properties of the nonrelativistic angular functions. Only for the highest m value does the spinor retain the nodal structure of the nonrelativistic angular function, and that is because it is a simple product of a spin function and a spherical harmonic. The admixture of me and me + I character approaches equality as I increases and as me approaches zero, resulting in a loss of spatial directionality. The implications of this loss of directionality for molecular structure could be significant, particularly where the structure is not determined simply from the molecular symmetry or from electrostatics. 

---