Spherical field situation

Here r and v are respectively the electron position and velocity, r = —(e2 /em)(r/r3) is the acceleration in the coulombic field of the positive ion and q = /3kBT/m. The mobility of the quasi-free electron is related to / and the relaxation time T by p = e/m/3 = et/m, so that fi = T l. In the spherically symmetrical situation, a density function n(vr, vt, t) may be defined such that n dr dvr dvt = W dr dv here, vr and vt and are respectively the radical and normal velocities. Expectation values of all dynamical variables are obtained from integration over n. Since the electron experiences only radical force (other than random interactions), it is reasonable to expect that its motion in the v space is basically a free Brownian motion only weakly coupled to r and vr by the centrifugal force. The correlations1, K(r, v,2) and fc(vr, v(2) are then neglected. Another condition, cr(r)2 (r)2, implying that the electron distribution is not too much delocalized on r, is verified a posteriori. Following Chandrasekhar (1943), the density function may now be written as an uncoupled product, n = gh, where... 

It is conventional to depict only the splitting owing to the nonspherical component of the field the orbital energies are shown relative to the situation in a spherical field. Perturbation theory requires that the smn of the energies of the orbitals in an octahedral field must be equal to the... 

One complexity is that much classical theory has been developed for identically sized spherical particles - conditions that may not be obtained in all laboratory or field situations. Indeed, many natural... 

We shall also present a short discussion of the theorem of corresponding states as applied to single component systems of molecules with spherical field of force. In a later chapter of this book we shall discuss the extension of this theorem to more complicated situations and to mixtures. 

In some force fields the interaction sites are not all situated on the atomic nuclei. For example, in the MM2, MM3 and MM4 programs, the van der Waals centres of hydrogen atoms bonded to carbon are placed not at the nuclei but are approximately 10% along the bond towards the attached atom. The rationale for this is that the electron distribution about small atoms such as oxygen, fluorine and particularly hydrogen is distinctly non-spherical. The single electron from the hydrogen is involved in the bond to the adjacent atom and there are no other electrons that can contribute to the van der Waals interactions. Some force fields also require lone pairs to be defined on particular atoms these have their own van der Waals and electrostatic parameters. 

Applying again the Gauss s formula and taking into account the spherical symmetry, we find that inside the shell, Rai, it behaves as a point source situated at the origin. Thus, we have... 

This situation can be somewhat ameliorated by choosing a regular ellipsoid instead of a sphere for the solute cavity. In that case, Eq. (11.17) can still be solved in a simple fashion, with the reaction field factors depending on the ellipsoidal semiaxes (Rinaldi, Rivail, and Rguini 1992). However, while this is clearly an improvement on a spherical cavity, the small number of solutes that may be well described as ellipsoidal does not make this a particularly satisfactory solution. 

Completely abandoning translational symmetry (d/dz — 0) does not yet mean that a dynamo is possible. In reality, as will be shown in this paper, a dynamo may be absent even for fields which depend on all three coordinates if one of the components of the velocity of the fluid vanishes. The impossibility of a dynamo in the three-dimensional situation was first indicated in a paper by Bullard and Gellman [9] for the spherical case with vr = 0 (see also [10, 11]) the plane case was discussed by Moffatt [6]. The situation is simplest in a plane geometry for a conducting fluid moving with vz = 0. 

Munera and Guzman [56] obtained new explicit noncyclic solutions for the three-dimensional time-dependent wave equation in spherical coordinates. Their solutions constitute a new solution for the classical Maxwell equations. It is shown that the class of Lorenz-invariant inductive phenomena may have longitudinal fields as solution. But here, these solutions correspond to massless particles. Hence, in this framework a photon with zero rest mass may be compatible with a longitudinal field in contrast to that Lehnert, Evans, and Roscoe frameworks. But the extra degrees of freedom associated with this kind of longitudinal solution without nonzero photon mass is not clear, at least at the present state of development of the theory. More efforts are needed to clarify this situation. 

---