The Spherical Case

From Lemma 10.1.5 together with Lemma 10.1.6 we obtain, in particular, that L is spherical if and only if there exists a positive integer j and an element l 

Let l be an element in L, and let us assume (L) to be finite. Then there exist positive integers i and j such that i + l j and Ri(l) H Rj l) is not empty. Thus, the claim follows from Corollary 10.1.2(ii) together with Lemma 10.1.5. 

We define d to be the smallest element in S-i L)). However, having fixed L for the remainder of this section, we shall write d instead of d.  

Let h and k be elements in L such that h k. Since S -i(L) contains an element of length d, we obtain from Corollary 10.1.4 that Rd h) fl Rd k) is not empty. Of course, we also have that Ro(h) fl Ro(k) is not empty. The first part of the following lemma is a partial converse of this. 

Let s be an element in (L). Then, by Lemma 3.1.l(i), there exists a non-negative integer n such that s = Ln. Thus, by Lemma 10.1.3, there exists a non-negative integer i and an element l in L such that s G Ri(l). 

---

One further lesson can also be drawn from the entertainment with the FeS2—m, hep X2 model. Compounds with the FeS2—m type structure (as well as other types with smaller or larger internally connected aggregates of A atoms) are normally believed to exhibit an internal measure for the size of A (i.e. radius in the spherical case), which in turn would permit derivation of the corresponding quantity for T. The procedure requires that the radius of A with respect to A equals that... 

Systems such as Bunsen flames are in many ways more complicated than either the plane case or the spherical case. Before proceeding, consider the methods of observation. The following methods have been most widely used to observe the flame ... 

The diffusion equation for three-dimensional diffusive crystal dissolution in the spherical case (Eq. 4-90) is rarely encountered and too complicated. Hence, such problems will not be treated here. 

In the spherical case, however, there is no simple wave, but for each radial line within the fan-like region, there is ... 

Recall that there is a fundamental scaling difference between the cylindrical wedge flow and the spherical inclined-disk flow. In the wedge flow, the Reynolds number is independent of r, whereas in the spherical case, the Reynolds number scales as /r. Thus, in the spherical case, there is a different Reynolds number at every radial position in the channel. In practice, a quantitative determination of the velocity profile is more complex in the spherical case. The nondimensional velocity profile must be determined at each radial position where the actual velocity profile is desired. 

Completely abandoning translational symmetry (d/dz — 0) does not yet mean that a dynamo is possible. In reality, as will be shown in this paper, a dynamo may be absent even for fields which depend on all three coordinates if one of the components of the velocity of the fluid vanishes. The impossibility of a dynamo in the three-dimensional situation was first indicated in a paper by Bullard and Gellman [9] for the spherical case with vr = 0 (see also [10, 11]) the plane case was discussed by Moffatt [6]. The situation is simplest in a plane geometry for a conducting fluid moving with vz = 0. 

Although Eq. (110) is a classical result, Eq. (115) is decoherence protected for zero rest mass particles since dJ fconj is nondiagonal with a zero determinant (for all values of r). For a particle with mo 0, the only singular point is at r = RLS. This occurs when Newton s law of gravity is appended with an appropriate boundary condition, see Eqs. (98)—(101). Nevertheless, the introduction of the operator Es replacing the conventional notion of a rest mass implies the construction of an invariant d5 onj = -c2ds2, which by definition must be zero for photons. The result is the well-known line element expression (in the spherical case)... 

In fig. 2 we exhibit some results for a sequence of Rb nuclei with this modification included. We have also corrected an error that occured in an earlier version of the computer code for some Av = 0 transitions in the spherical case. The error was usually small. Compared to [KRU84] fig. 2 contains only these two modifications and the differences relative to the earlier results are small. However the introduction of the width d is very important in some other cases as can be seen in fig. 1. 

General solutions to this problem have been suggested [17-21], The algorithm is complicated, requires cumbersome notation and has been actively performed only for simple spatially symmetric cases. We consider below the spherical case as an illustration. The solution is represented [19] as... 

To make headway with the colloidal problem, the Poisson-Boltzmann equation must be solved in spherical coordinates. -> Debye and -> Huckel [iv] introduced the following approximation into the spherical case,... 

For the spherical case the gradient of magnitude q is applied along the polar axis of the spherical polar coordinate frame. The boundary is at a radial distance r = a from the sphere center ... 

Figure 7 shows the function curve A for the cylindrical case (equation 16), and curve B for the spherical case (equation 18). 

Thus the diffusion current for the spherical case is just that for the linear situation plus a constant term. For a planar electrode. 

The slope at the surface is Co/ o, which gives the steady-state current, (5.2.21), from the current-flux relationship for the spherical case. 

---