Speciation derivatisation methods

Agemian and Bedak [42] have described a semi-automated method for the determination of total arsenic in soils. Chappell et al. [43] have described an inexpensive but effective method for the quantitative determination of arsenic species in contaminated soils. Chappell found that the extraction efficiency varied with the ratio of soil to acid and with the concentration of the acid. Rurikova and Beno [346] accomplished speciation of arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) in soils by cathodic stripping voltammetry. Wenclawiak and Krah [347] used reactive supercritical fluid extraction in speciation studies of inorganic and organic arsenic in soils. In this method, derivatisation with thioglycollic acid methyl ester was performed in supercritical carbon dioxide. Various other workers have discussed the determination of arsenic in soils [44-46]. 

There are few methods which can measure well-defined metal fractions with sufficient sensitivity for direct use with environmental samples (approach B in Fig. 8.2). Nevertheless, this approach is necessary in the experimental determination of the distribution of compounds that are labile with respect to the time scales of the analytical method. Recent literature indicates that high-performance liquid (HPLC) and gas chromatographic (GC) based techniques may have such capabilities (Batley and Low, 1989 Chau and Wong, 1989 van Loon and Barefoot, 1992 Kitazume et al, 1993 Rottmann and Heumann, 1994 Baxter and Freeh, 1995 Szpunar-Lobinska et al, 1995 Ellis and Roberts, 1997 Vogl and Heumann, 1998). The ability to vary both the stationary and mobile phases, in conjunction with suitable detector selection (e.g. ICP-MS), provides considerable discriminatory power. HPLC is the superior method GC has the disadvantage that species normally need to be derivatised to volatile forms prior to analysis. Capillary electrophoresis also shows promise as a metal speciation tool its main advantage is the absence of potential equilibria perturbation, interactions... 

As mentioned in the introduction, methods used in tin speciation are generally composed of a succession of analytical steps (extraction, derivatisation, separation and detection) which vary drastically from one laboratory to another. The variety of methods used in the certifications is summarised in Table 9.4. 

The core techniques developed for mercury speciation take advantage of gaseous species separation after an initial derivatisation step. However GC may lead to some problems and there is increasing motivation to use LC separation methods, for which the derivatisation step and all implications connected with it, like species transformation, etc., is avoided. With LC, inorganic mercury and methylmercury compounds can be determined, but it is also possible to analyse less volatile or non-volatile species such as mersalic acid or aromatic mercury compounds, which are not accessible for GC separation. 

---