Solar excitonic

New Solar Cells Quantum Dot (QD) Structures and Multiple Exciton Generation (MEG)... 

The second type of solar cell is based on a /m-heterojunction in analogy to semiconductor devices [274]. Excitons generated by light, diffuse and dissociate at the interface between a hole and an electron-conducting material. The optimum layer thickness was calculated to be 1.5 times the exciton diffusion length [275]. 

Fig. 4 Schematic illustration of the processes leading to photocurrent generation in organic solar cells, (a) Photon absorption in Step 1 leads to excitons that may diffuse in Step 2 to the donor/ acceptor (D/A) interface. Quenching of the exciton at the D/A interface in Step 3 leads to formation of the charge-transfer (CT) state. Note that processes analogous to Steps 1-3 may also occur in the acceptor material, (b) Charge separation in Step 4 leads to free polarons that are transported through the organic layers and collected at the electrodes in Steps 5 and 6, respectively, (c) The equilibria involved in Steps 1-4- strongly influence device efficiency...

Gregg BA (2003) Excitonic solar cells. J Phys Chem B 107 4688... 

Lee J, Vandewal K, Yost SR, Bahlke ME, Goris L, Baldo MA, Manca JV, Van Voorhis T (2010) Charge transfer state versus hot exciton dissociation in polymer-fullerene blended solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 132 11878... 

DSSCs convert sunlight to electricity by a different mechanism than conventional p-n junction solar cell. Light is absorbed directly at the solid/liquid interface by a monolayer of adsorbed dye, and initial charge separation occurs without the need of exciton transport.42,43 Following the initial charge separation, electrons and holes are confined in two different chemical phases electrons in the nanocrystalline... 

The recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes is the bane of all solar cells and a major reason for their less than ideal efficiencies. Excitonic solar cells, in which the electrons and holes exist in separate chemical phases, are subject primarily to interfacial recombination. There is, as yet, no theoretical model to accurately describe interfacial recombination processes, and this is an important area for future research. Wang and Suna [91] have laid a possible foundation for such a model by combining Marcus theory with Onsager theory. 

Despite the lack of theoretical models for interfacial recombination processes in excitonic solar cells, it is obvious empirically that those cells which function efficiently must have a very slow rate of recombination. In DSSCs, this can be explained simply by the slow electron self-exchange rate of the I /I2 redox couple and the absence of field-driven recombination. However, in the case of solid-state, high-surface-area OPV cells, such as the conducting polymer/C60-derivative cells [36,39], the slow rate of interfacial recombination is an important problem that is not yet understood. 

Organic semiconductor photovoltaic cells share many characteristics with both DSSCs and conventional cells. Charge generation occurs almost exclusively by interfacial exciton dissociation, as in DSSCs, but, in contrast, OPV cells usually contain no mobile electrolyte and thus rely on Vcharge separation. OPV cells may have planar interfaces, like conventional PV cells, or highly structured interfaces, like DSSCs. They provide a conceptual and experimental bridge between DSSCs and conventional solar cells. 

---