Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Slater type orbitals functions

STO Slater-Type Orbital. Functions which loosely resemble hydrogen-like orbitals, especially insofar as the dependence is exp(— r). [Pg.395]

These functions are universally known as Slater type orbitals (STOs) and are just the leading term in the appropriate Laguerre polynomials. The first three Slater functions are as follows ... [Pg.75]

The coefficients and the exponents are found by least-squares fitting, in which the overlap between the Slater type function and the Gaussian expansion is maximised. Thus, for the Is Slater type orbital we seek to maximise the following integral ... [Pg.88]

Several functional forms have been investigated for the basis functions Given the vast experience of using Gaussian functions in Hartree-Fock theory it will come as no surprise to learn that such functions have also been employed in density functional theory. However, these are not the only possibility Slater type orbitals are also used, as are numerical... [Pg.151]

The application of density functional theory to isolated, organic molecules is still in relative infancy compared with the use of Hartree-Fock methods. There continues to be a steady stream of publications designed to assess the performance of the various approaches to DFT. As we have discussed there is a plethora of ways in which density functional theory can be implemented with different functional forms for the basis set (Gaussians, Slater type orbitals, or numerical), different expressions for the exchange and correlation contributions within the local density approximation, different expressions for the gradient corrections and different ways to solve the Kohn-Sham equations to achieve self-consistency. This contrasts with the situation for Hartree-Fock calculations, wlrich mostly use one of a series of tried and tested Gaussian basis sets and where there is a substantial body of literature to help choose the most appropriate method for incorporating post-Hartree-Fock methods, should that be desired. [Pg.157]

We do not know the orbitals of the electrons either. (An orbital, by the way, is not a ball of fuzz, it is a mathematical function.) We can reasonably assume that the ground-state orbitals of electrons I and 2 are similar but not identical to the Is orbital of hydrogen. The Slater-type orbitals... [Pg.237]

The Slater-type orbitals are a family of functions that give us an economical way of approximating various atomic orbitals (which, for atoms other than hydrogen, we don t know anyway) in a single relatively simple form. For the general case, STOs are written... [Pg.243]

Slater type orbital (STO) mathematical function for describing the wave function of an electron in an atom, which is rigorously correct for atoms with one electron... [Pg.368]

T vo main streams of computational techniques branch out fiom this point. These are referred to as ab initio and semiempirical calculations. In both ab initio and semiempirical treatments, mathematical formulations of the wave functions which describe hydrogen-like orbitals are used. Examples of wave functions that are commonly used are Slater-type orbitals (abbreviated STO) and Gaussian-type orbitals (GTO). There are additional variations which are designated by additions to the abbreviations. Both ab initio and semiempirical calculations treat the linear combination of orbitals by iterative computations that establish a self-consistent electrical field (SCF) and minimize the energy of the system. The minimum-energy combination is taken to describe the molecule. [Pg.25]

Minimal basis sets use fixed-size atomic-type orbitals. The STO-3G basis set is a minimal basis set (although it is not the smallest possible basis set). It uses three gaussian primitives per basis function, which accounts for the 3G in its name. STO stands for Slater-type orbitals, and the STO-3G basis set approximates Slater orbitals with gaussian functions. ... [Pg.97]

In honour of J. C. Slater, we refer to such basis functions as Slater-type orbitals (STOs). Slater orbital exponents ( = (Z — s)/n ) for atoms through neon are given in Table 9.2. [Pg.158]

The self-consistent field function for atoms with 2 to 36 electrons are computed with a minimum basis set of Slater-type orbitals. The orbital exponents of the atomic orbitals are optimized so as to ensure the energy minimum. The analysis of the optimized orbital exponents allows us to obtain simple and accurate rules for the 1 s, 2s, 3s, 4s, 2p, 3p, 4p and 3d electronic screening constants. These rules are compared with those proposed by Slater and reveal the need for the screening due to the outside electrons. The analysis of the screening constants (and orbital exponents) is extended to the excited states of the ground state configuration and the positive ions. [Pg.159]

The first step in reducing the computational problem is to consider only the valence electrons explicitly, the core electrons are accounted for by reducing the nuclear charge or introducing functions to model the combined repulsion due to the nuclei and core electrons. Furthermore, only a minimum basis set (the minimum number of functions necessary for accommodating the electrons in the neutral atom) is used for the valence electrons. Hydrogen thus has one basis function, and all atoms in the second and third rows of the periodic table have four basis functions (one s- and one set of p-orbitals, pj, , Pj, and Pj). The large majority of semi-empirical methods to date use only s- and p-functions, and the basis functions are taken to be Slater type orbitals (see Chapter 5), i.e. exponential functions. [Pg.81]

The MNDO, AMI and PM3 methods are parameterizations of the NDDO model, where the parameterization is in terms of atomic variables, i.e. referring only to the nature of a single atom. MNDO, AMI and PM3 are derived from the same basic approximations (NDDO), and differ only in the way the core-core repulsion is treated, and how the parameters are assigned. Each method considers only the valence s- and p-functions, which are taken as Slater type orbitals with corresponding exponents, (s and... [Pg.85]

There are two types of basis functions (also called Atomic Orbitals, AO, although in general they are not solutions to an atomic Schrodinger equation) commonly used in electronic structure calculations Slater Type Orbitals (STO) and Gaussian Type Orbitals (GTO). Slater type orbitals have die functional form... [Pg.150]

Representation of each molecular orbital as a linear combination of atomic orbitals (atomic basis sets). Atomic basis sets are usually represented as Slater type orbitals or as combinations of Gaussian functions. The latter is very popular, due to a very fast algorithm for the computation of bielectronic integrals. [Pg.154]


See other pages where Slater type orbitals functions is mentioned: [Pg.384]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.252]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.6]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.126 , Pg.127 , Pg.128 ]




SEARCH



Basis functions function Slater-type orbitals

Finite basis functions Slater-type orbitals

Functional types

Functions types

Orbital functionals

Orbitals types

Slater

Slater functions

Slater orbital

Slater orbitals

Slater-Type Orbitals

Slater-type

Slater-type function

Slater-type functions, spin orbital products

Slater-type orbital

© 2024 chempedia.info