Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Singlet-triplet evolution

The RP must live long enough to allow singlet-triplet evolution under MF that is one of the main demands for observation of each of the three MFEs briefly mentioned above. [Pg.254]

Both the primary pair RH. ..e and the secondary pairs D. ..e, Rtf. ..A and D . ..A can undergo singlet-triplet evolution and yield an excited product whose multiplicity corresponds to the spin pair multiplicity upon recombination. From the prospects of recording the spin coherence effects, such pairs exhibit the... [Pg.68]

The time of the diffusive approach of radical ions in the pairs D. ..A and RH. ..A is large enough and can exceed the typical time of singlet-triplet evolution. In organic radical ions, the latter is usually determined by the constants of hyperfine interactions (hfi) and varies from nanoseconds to tens of nanoseconds. [Pg.69]

The singlet-triplet evolution is not complicated by the exchange interaction between pair radicals, because the initial distances in pairs are large enough and the act of recombination (electron transfer) needs no contact of reagents in nonpolar solutions. [Pg.69]

The singlet and triplet pairs give different recombination products, i.e., either singlet or triplet excited molecules. Therefore, the singlet-triplet evolution is readily detected by highly sensitive luminescence methods, i.e., either stationary or time-resolved. In the latter case, the photon counting technique is usually used. [Pg.69]

Looking more closely at the evolution of IIT1 at low temperatures, it is interesting to note that there seems to be a coexistence between the insulating and metallic behavior at 8 kbar. For low temperatures, the behavior is linear like in a metallic state with a relatively low density of states (this would correspond to y=3.10 1 emu/mol) but it increases more steeply up to room temperature, as if the singlet-triplet transitions were still present in the metal. [Pg.190]

A detailed description of CIDEP mechanisms is outside the scope of this chapter. Several monographs and reviews are available that describe the spin physics and chemistry. Briefly, the radical pair mechanism (RPM) arises from singlet-triplet electron spin wave function evolution during the first few nanoseconds of the diffusive radical pair lifetime. For excited-state triplet precursors, the phase of the resulting TREPR spectrum is low-field E, high-field A. The triplet mechanism (TM) is a net polarization arising from anisotropic intersystem crossing in the molecular excited states. For the polymers under study here, the TM is net E in all cases, which is unusual for aliphatic carbonyls and will be discussed in more detail in a later section. Other CIDEP mechanisms, such as the radical-triplet pair mechanism and spin-correlated radical pair mechanism, are excluded from this discussion, as they do not appear in any of the systems presented here. [Pg.331]

Ring, et al., (1998 and 1999) have used a time-dependent magnetic field and the combination of a static magnetic field in a direction perpendicular to that of a time-dependent field to create and manipulate novel coherences and to monitor the quantum beats associated with specifiable details of the time evolution of these coherences. The frequencies and decay rates of different classes of coherence (AMj = 2 and 1 polarization beats, AMj = 0 singlet triplet population beats) may be sampled and modified selectively. [Pg.433]

Figure 3. Comparison between the evolution with the inverse number of thiophene rings, 1/n (i) the INDO/MRD-CI singlet-singlet Sq->S, (solid line, closed circles) and singlet-triplet Sq— T, (dashed line, open circles) energies and (ii) the experimental So->S, (closed squares (33) closed triangles (3 )) and Sq->T, (open squares (37)) energies obtained from measurements in solution. Figure 3. Comparison between the evolution with the inverse number of thiophene rings, 1/n (i) the INDO/MRD-CI singlet-singlet Sq->S, (solid line, closed circles) and singlet-triplet Sq— T, (dashed line, open circles) energies and (ii) the experimental So->S, (closed squares (33) closed triangles (3 )) and Sq->T, (open squares (37)) energies obtained from measurements in solution.
Figure 2. Evolution of the INDO/MRD-CI-ca culated Sq— Si and Sq—>Ti transition energies (full circles) as a function of the inverse number of thiophene units Q/n). We also plot the corresponding experimental data (open squares) extracted from Refs. [56, 57] and [59] for the singlet-sin et transition and from Ref. [62] for the singlet-triplet excitation. Figure 2. Evolution of the INDO/MRD-CI-ca culated Sq— Si and Sq—>Ti transition energies (full circles) as a function of the inverse number of thiophene units Q/n). We also plot the corresponding experimental data (open squares) extracted from Refs. [56, 57] and [59] for the singlet-sin et transition and from Ref. [62] for the singlet-triplet excitation.
Rao reported measurement of third-order optical non-linearity in the nanosecond and picosecond domains for phosphorus tetratolyl porphyrins bearing two hydroxyl groups in apical position [89]. Strong nonlinear absorption was found at both 532 nm and 600 nm. The high value of nonlinearity for nanosecond pulses is attributed to higher exited singlet and triplet states. Time resolved studies indicate an ultra-fast temporal evolution of the nonlinearity in this compound. [Pg.31]


See other pages where Singlet-triplet evolution is mentioned: [Pg.8]    [Pg.377]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.457]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.323]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.325]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.289]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.320]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.228]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.159]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.68 ]




SEARCH



Singlet-triplet

© 2024 chempedia.info