Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Single current theories

With this choice of j8, the theoretical picture presented in this section is consistent, for example, with the range in MJM (from about 2 to about 20) explored by the polyisoprene (PI) data set of Fetters et al. [5] using a single value of Mg of 5000 g mol" The viscosities of these melts cover five decades in magnitude yet the current theory, together with values for Gq and Tg consistent with data on linear PI predicts the entire range of viscoelastic spectra (see Fig. 9). [Pg.221]

New theory will be required to describe the phase diagram of block liposomes. In particular, theories have to break new ground in explaining why nanorods and nanotubes stay attached to spherical vesicles. All current theories of lipid self-assemblies (based on Helffich s theory of membranes [98]), in contrast, predict spherical, tubular, and micellar shaped liposomes but only as separate objects. In our experiments, not a single instance of an isolated rod- or tube-shaped liposome (i.e., not connected to a sphere- or pear-shaped vesicle) was found. [Pg.222]

Current theories of particle physics predict that, in a vacuum, the positron is a stable particle, and laboratory evidence in support of this comes from experiments in which a single positron has been trapped for periods of the order of three months (Van Dyck, Schwinberg and Dehmelt, 1987). If the CPT theorem is invoked then the intrinsic positron lifetime must be > 4 x 1023 yr, the experimental limit on the stability of the electron (Aharonov et al., 1995). [Pg.4]

Lastly, the single-events theory, which was historically designed for the activation of carbon-carbon bonds, does not currently cover the reactivity of C-S and C-N bonds. Some computer models have been produced to represent the possible presence of hetero atoms in hydrocarbon structures. Avenues are therefore open for a very wide field of application, that of HDT reactions and sulphide catalysis. They must nevertheless be based on an in-depth, improved description of the heterolytic mechanisms, also studied (Blanchin et al., 2001) under IFP supervision. [Pg.302]

We know from our single-phase alternating current theory earlier in this chapter that power can be found from the following formula ... [Pg.115]

Extensive experimental evidence collected since the middle of the 19th century indicates that atoms are made up of many smaller particles. More than 100 of these subatomic particles have been discovered, and the search for more continues. As yet there is no single theory that can explain all observations involving subatomic particles, but three fundamental particles are included in all current theories the proton, the neutron, and the electron. Most chemical behavior of matter can be explained in terms of a few of the well-known characteristics of these particles. These important characteristics are mass, electrical charge, and location in atoms. They are summarized in > Table 2.3. The atomic mass unit (u) shown in the table is discussed in Section 2.4. [Pg.82]

On the experimental front, Bias Cabrera claimed the detection of a magnetic monopole on February 14,1982, after 150 days of searching with a superconducting quantum interferometer device (SQUID). If this observation were correct and even approximately corresponded to the typical distribution of monopoles in space, then neither the excessive production of a naive GUT model nor the extreme scarcity of a new inflationary model could be credible. Confirmation of this monopole detection would leave current theory totally at a loss to explain the monopole abundance, but neither Cabrera nor other observers have yet claimed another detection. After more than 3000 days had passed, most workers were of the opinion that the single event was due to something less exotic than a magnetic monopole. [Pg.54]

The more recently developed methods define an energy expression for the combined calculation and then use that expression to compute gradients for a geometry optimization. Some of the earlier methods would use a simpler level of theory for the geometry optimization and then add additional energy corrections to a final single point calculation. The current generation is considered to be the superior technique. [Pg.203]


See other pages where Single current theories is mentioned: [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.380]    [Pg.625]    [Pg.1212]    [Pg.528]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.148]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.1775]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.5]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.136]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.64 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info