Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Separation of bound and free ligand

The key advantages of FP assays are (1) mix and measure mode without physical separation of bound and free ligands [59, 75] (2) only one of the binding partners needs to bear a fluorescent label (3) a ratiometric determination of fluorescence signals is more robust with respect to the inner filter effect caused by absorbing compounds (4) low reagent costs (5) fuUy amenable to miniaturization, even to the 1536-well format [76-78]. [Pg.634]

With the method described, the separation of bound and free ligand only takes a few seconds allowing for detection of interactions with high off-rates. It is also a convenient way to change tubes, which is necessary when working with cytosol due to adherence of many proteins to the plastic. The one-step wash procedure may result in some unspecific proteins still bound to the beads. It is therefore important to include negative controls and, if specific bands are detected, to repeat the experiment with additional washings if cleaner results are required, for example, for mass spectrometry identification. [Pg.552]

Many immunoassays require a separation step prior to quantitation, in order to separate the bound and free fractions of the labeled species. Consider an immunoassay in which a labeled ligand, Ag, competes with unlabeled analyte, Ag, for a limited quantity of antibody binding sites. This competitive equilibrium is represented by Eqs. 6.5 and 6.6,... [Pg.102]

The first step of the mechanism leading The electrochemical study of the seven-to the formation of 8 and free nitrite coordinate complex [Mo(N2RR )(dtc)3]+ from the reaction of 7 with O2 probably 9+ (R, R = alkyl or aryl, dtc = 5 2CNMe2) involved a single electron transfer. Sub- provided an example of electrode-induced sequent radical-radical coupling of the activation of a hydrazido(2—) ligand. Corn-products, to afford a molybdenum-bound plex 9+ was shown to reduce in two nitrate, followed by N—O bond cleavage separate diffusion-controlled one-electron would eventually lead to the observed steps, with the first one reversible on the products (Sch. 8) [27]. CV timescale at room temperature and... [Pg.572]

Different techniques have been applied to study the protein-protein, protein-ligand and, in particular, MIP-ligand interactions. They may serve to estimate or determine the binding constant and the number of independent binding sites (N) of a ligand-to-receptor (MIP or antibody) interaction. The range of affinity constants that can be calculated depends on the sensitivity of the assay and, in those cases where the separation of the bound and free species is a step of the assay, perturbation of the equilibria in the separation step will also be important [22]. Direct nonseparation techniques such as spectroscopic techniques (e.g., SPR or fluorescence polarization) can be used as well as indirect separation techniques such as radiolabeling [22]. [Pg.122]

Most important for successful assays is the method of separating bound from free ligand. In the original study of Yalow and Berson using human anti-insulin, this was accomplished by electrophoresis on paper. [Pg.32]

Charcoal is widely used to separate antibody-bound ligand (bound) from non-antibody-bound ligand (free) in competitive protein binding assays. Its use was originally described by Miller for vitamin Bi assay and later by Herbert et al. for B12. In 1965, Herbert suggested its use to separate bound and free in the radioimmunoassay of insulin. Since then it has been used for a large number of radioimmunoassays and radioreceptor assays. [Pg.274]

Once conditions for assay and amount of charcoal are selected, they must be kept constant. If conditions are changed (e.g., larger volumes of serum assayed) the charcoal dose must be reselected. Last, as a precaution, we recommend recharacterization of these data at least once each 6 months to assure proper use. It is important to note that errors in separation of antibody-bound from free ligand are interpreted in the assay as hormone being measured in the assay tube. Such errors in separation can even show parallel dose-response curves between unknown sample and reference preparation. [Pg.279]


See other pages where Separation of bound and free ligand is mentioned: [Pg.318]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.2055]    [Pg.1995]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.2055]    [Pg.1995]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.267]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.141]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.452]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.1577]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.338]    [Pg.915]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.648]    [Pg.649]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.167]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.32]    [Pg.316]   


SEARCH



Bound-free separation

Free ligand

Ligand bound

© 2024 chempedia.info