Semi-discrete approach

Several families of modeling methods have been developed. Boisse et al. (2008) have reviewed many of these methods and have classified them as continuous, discrete and semi-discrete approaches. In the continuous approach, the fabric is homogenized and considered as a continuum. Conventional shell or membrane elements are used, but special considerations of solid mechanics are used to track the evolution of the principal... 

In the continuous processing of discrete samples in the AutoAnalyzer system, the reaction-time is held constant by the manifold design, and because the rise-curve is exponential the degree of attainment of steady-state conditions is independent of concentration. Consequently it is unnecessary for the analytical reaction to proceed to completion for Beer s Law to be obeyed. This confers a considerable advantage upon the AutoAnalyzer approach and one which is frequently emphasized. The relationship between degree of attainment of steady state and IT,/, can be generaHzed in the semi-logarithmic plot of Fig. 2.16 [10], where time is expressed in units of IT,/,. 

In order to extend the linearization scheme to non-adiabatic dynamics it is convenient to represent the role of the discrete electronic states in terms of operators that simplify the evolution of the quantum subsystem with out changing its effect on the classical bath. A way to do this was first suggested by Miller, McCurdy and Meyer [28,29[ and has more recently been revisited by Thoss and Stock [30, 31[. Their method, known as the mapping formalism, represents the electronic degrees of freedom and the transitions between different states in terms of positions and momenta of a set of fictitious harmonic oscillators. Formally the approach is exact, but approximations (e.g. semi-classical, linearized SC-IVR, etc.) must be made for its numerical implementation. 

For bubbly flows most of the early papers either adopted a macroscopic population balance approach with an inherent discrete discretization scheme as described earlier, or rather semi-empirical transport equations for the contact area and/or the particle diameter. Actually, very few consistent source term closures exist for the microscopic population balance formulation. The existing models are usually solved using discrete semi-integral techniques, as will be outlined in the next sub-section. 

As a basis, Schoeller et al. took a semi-classical Master equation approach to calculate the transport properties. Thereby, they assumed an incoherent tunneling, which was treated as a perturbation, while the Coulomb interaction between charged nanopartides was taken into account nonpertubatively within a capacitance model. However, in contrast to the standard orthodox theory, they explidtly considered the discrete nature of the electronic spectrum of the nanopartides. In the calculated /(V)... 

The solution strategy is somewhat varied by the last step since the approach used to linearize and solve the discretized equations varies with the solver type. The two commonly employed solvers in the FVM 2se pressure-based and density-based solvers [ 12,16]. In both methods the velocity field is obtained from the momentum equations. In the density-based approach, the continuity equation is used to obtain the density field, while the pressure field is determined from an equation of state. On the other hand, the pressure-based solver extracts the pressure field by solving the pressure or pressure correction equation, which is obtained by manipulation of the momentum and continuity equations [16]. Implementation of the pressure-based solver via the so-called Semi-Implicit Method for Pressure-Linked Equations (SIMPLE) algorithm [12] is explained later. Details of the density-based solver are extensively covered elsewhere [16] and will not be discussed here. 

The state-transition model can be analyzed using a number of approaches as a Markov chains, using semi-Markov processes or using Monte Carlo simulation (Fishman 1996). The applicability of each method depends on the assumptions that can be made regarding faults occurrence and a repair time. In case of the Markov approach, it is necessary to assume that both the faults and renewals occur with constant intensities (i.e. exponential distribution). Also the large number of states makes Markov or semi-Markov method more difficult to use. Presented in the previous section reliability model includes random values with exponential, truncated normal and discrete distributions as well as some periodic relations (staff working time), so it is hard to be solved by analytical methods. 

Semi-continuous mixtures form a category in between the continuous chemical mixtures and the ordinary multicomponent mixtures. For example, solvents in a polymer solution or light hydrocarbons in a gas-condensate system can be described by discrete concentrations or mole fractions, whereas the continuous components are described by a density or distribution function approach as just outlined. For an introduction to such systems and the basics of calculation procedures needed to describe separation, consult Cotterman et al. (1985) and Cotterman and Prausnitz (1985). 

Sulphene chemistry has been reviewed. No sulphene has yet been isolated and purified, but evidence continues to accrue that sulphenes do have a discrete existence. Based on chemical evidence that the carbon end of the sulphene bond C=S02 carries a negative charge and acts as a nucleophilic site, the usual approach toward obtaining a stable sulphene has been to attach electron-withdrawing groups to the carbon atom with a hope of dispersing that charge. To date this approach has been unsuccessful. Semi-empirical MO calculations by Snyder" now have indicated that the... 

---