Self-energy matrix elements

Comparison of the self-energy matrix elements of equation 45 with older, related methods [7,15] reveals the advantages of the P3 approximation. Among the intermediates required in third order is... 

Second-order and third-order results often bracket the true correction to pF - Three schemes that scale the third-order terms in various ways are known as the Outer Valence Green s Function (OVGF) [8], In OVGF calculations, one of these three recipes is chosen as the recommended one according to rules based on numerical criteria. These criteria involve quantities that are derived from ratios of various constituent terms of the self-energy matrix elements. Average absolute errors for closed-shell molecules are somewhat larger than for P3 [31]. 

This procedure requires analytical expressions for EPP(E) and its derivative with respect to E it usually converges in three iterations. Neglect of off-diagonal elements of the self-energy matrix also implies that the corresponding Dyson orbital is given by ... 

More satisfactory results are obtained from full third-order calculations [32, 33]. Diagonal elements of the full third-order, self-energy matrix are given by... 

Neglecting off-diagonal elements of the self-energy matrix in the canonical Hartree-Fock basis in (1.15) constitutes the quasiparticle approximation. With this approximation, the calculation of EADEs is simplified, for each KT result may be improved with many-body corrections that reside in a diagonal element of the self-energy matrix. 

We can apply for the diagonal elements of the self-energy matrix, X(ft>,) in the Moeller-Plesset (MP) many body perturbation theory (MBPT) in the second order (MP2) approximation... 

Equation (14) can be regarded as a self-starting recursive formulation, as the Gijkiy, p) for p = 0 require only values of the same F that are needed for the overlap and potential-energy matrix elements, while those for non-zero p require in addition only G(y, p ) for p whose index sum is one less than that of p. 

The P3 method is generally implemented in the diagonal self-energy approximation. Here, off-diagonal elements of the self-energy matrix in the canonical, Haruee-Fock orbital basis are set to zero. The pseudoeigenvalue problem therefore reduces to separate equations for each canonical, Hartree-Fock orbital ... 

The second step determines the LCAO coefficients by standard methods for matrix diagonalization. In an Extended Hiickel calculation, this results in molecular orbital coefficients and orbital energies. Ab initio and NDO calculations repeat these two steps iteratively because, in addition to the integrals over atomic orbitals, the elements of the energy matrix depend upon the coefficients of the occupied orbitals. HyperChem ends the iterations when the coefficients or the computed energy no longer change the solution is then self-consistent. The method is known as Self-Consistent Field (SCF) calculation. 

Diagonal matrix elements of the P3 self-energy approximation may be expressed in terms of canonical Hartree-Fock orbital energies and electron repulsion integrals in this basis. For ionization energies, where the index p pertains to an occupied spinorbital in the Hartree-Fock determinant,... 

The solution of the secular equation Fy —F5y = 0 requires the evaluation of the constituent matrix terms Fy. The Fy s are, however, themselves functions of the coefficients of the atomic orbitals amt through Pjel and therefore can only be evaluated by solving the secular equation. The Hartree-Fock procedure thus requires that a preliminary guess be made as to the values of the molecular population distribution terms Pici these values are then used to calculate the matrix elements Fy and thence solve the secular determinant. This, in turn, provides a better approximation to the wave function and an. .improved set of values of Pm. The above procedure is repeated with this first improved set and a second improved set evaluated. The process is repeated until no difference is found between successive improved wave functions. Finally, it may be shown that when such a calculation has been iterated to self-consistency the total electronic energy E of a closed shell molecule is given by... 

Let us consider a simple situation, when the nanosystem is coupled only to the end site of the ID lead (Fig. 3). From (26) we obtain the matrix elements of the self-energy... 

The relaxation of the structure in the KMC-DR method was done using an approach based on the density functional theory and linear combination of atomic orbitals implemented in the Siesta code [97]. The minimum basis set of localized numerical orbitals of Sankey type [98] was used for all atoms except silicon atoms near the interface, for which polarization functions were added to improve the description of the SiOx layer. The core electrons were replaced with norm-conserving Troullier-Martins pseudopotentials [99] (Zr atoms also include 4p electrons in the valence shell). Calculations were done in the local density approximation (LDA) of DFT. The grid in the real space for the calculation of matrix elements has an equivalent cutoff energy of 60 Ry. The standard diagonalization scheme with Pulay mixing was used to get a self-consistent solution. In the framework of the KMC-DR method, it is not necessary to perform an accurate optimization of the structure, since structure relaxation is performed many times. 

Our present focus is on correlated electronic structure methods for describing molecular systems interacting with a structured environment where the electronic wavefunction for the molecule is given by a multiconfigurational self-consistent field wavefunction. Using the MCSCF structured environment response method it is possible to determine molecular properties such as (i) frequency-dependent polarizabilities, (ii) excitation and deexcitation energies, (iii) transition moments, (iv) two-photon matrix elements, (v) frequency-dependent first hyperpolarizability tensors, (vi) frequency-dependent polarizabilities of excited states, (vii) frequency-dependent second hyperpolarizabilities (y), (viii) three-photon absorptions, and (ix) two-photon absorption between excited states. 

By iteration of the matrix equation (21) for the GF (12) over A one can obtain expressions for the self-energy and the terminal part [7-10], A GF (11), which is a matrix element n with respect to index v, can be represented in a multiplicative form ... 

We applied the generating functional approach to the periodic Anderson model. Calculation of the electron GFs gdd, 9ds, 9sd and gss reduces to calculation of only the d-electron GF. For this, an exact matrix equation was derived with the variational derivatives. Iterations with respect to the effective matrix element Aij(to) allow to construct a perturbation theory near the atomic limit. Along with the self-energy, the terminal part of the GF Q is very important. The first order correction for it describes the interaction of d-electrons with spin fluctuations. In the paramagnetic phase this term contains a logarithmic singularity near the Fermi-level and thus produces a Kondo-like resonance peak in the d-electron density of states. The spin susceptibility of d-electrons... 

---