Screening length, electronic

Thomas-Fermi screening length electron density/number of oscillators complex refractive index refractive index potential of zero charge reflectivity... 

Fig. 1. Electron temperature and density regions for plasmas (7—9) where the numbers and the diagonal lines represent (—) the Debye screening length,...

It is also interesting that if some of the simple models for the bare metal surface are used to calculate the metal s contribution to the capacitance, a fit to experimental results would require unreasonable values for the solution contribution. Thus, the simple Thomas-Fermi result88 of C(dip) = 47r/ATF (Atf = Thomas-Fermi screening length) is greater than C(experiment)-1, and the same is true for the improved Thomas-Fermi results of Newns40 and the model of free electrons at an infinitely repulsive wall [see Eq. (12)]. These models are thus considered to be less realistic than the model of this work.30... 

Within a jellium atom, the electron frequency is of order 1017/sec. compared with the plasmon frequency for jellium (1.1 x 1016/sec.) so an isolated jellium atom behaves as a dielectric. However, the valence electron screens any electric field caused by polarization. The screening length (Thomas-Fermi) is 0.47Ang., or 0.36 of the radius of the jellium atom. Thus the field of the positive ion is reduced by about 30% at R. 

The Thomas-Fermi approximation is, unfortunately, a poor approximation for the sp-valent metals. It is based on the assumption that the potential varies much more slowly than the screening length of the electrons themselves, so that the local approximation for the kinetic energy, eqn (6.6), is valid. In practice, however, the variation in the ionic potential is measured by the core radius, Rc (cf Fig. 5.11), which is not large but of the same size as the screening length, XTF. Thus, we do not satisfy the criterion for the validity... 

The wave vector, k , and the screening length, 1/ , depend only on the density of the free-electron gas through the poles of the approximated inverse dielectric response function, whereas the amplitude, A , and the phase shift, a , depend also on the nature of the ion-core pseudopotential through eqs (6.96) and (6.97). For the particular case of the Ashcroft empty-core pseudopotential, where tfj fa) = cos qRc, the modulus and phase are given explicitly by... 

Figure J8 Photoionization cross-section of the sodium ground state for different Debye screenings as a function of the ejected electron energy. Xp is the Debye screening length in au. Reprinted with permission (license number 2041490188918) from [252].

Here, q is the inverse of a screening length related to the valence electron density which contributes to the screening and /u. is a Lagrange multiplier controlling the total number of particles. The boundary conditions to be used with Equation (23) are that V(r) must match Vc r) at Rs and that rV(r) -> -1 as r -> 0. Once we have solved the Thomas-Fermi equation, we have calculated the screened function, defined as the bare impurity potential divided to the screened one, namely Vb/V. 

It is seen that A serves as a screening length, reflecting a correlation between the neighbouring solvent particles the local uncorrelated model corresponds to A = 0 and x r — r )ocS( r — r ). This notion explains the usually applicable term the correlation length [6], Equation (1.139) implies that the electronic polarization is local, i.e. no correlation exists inside solvent particles, which is an approximation. 

Here q and q2 are the ion charges in units of electron charge e, and the so-called Debye screening length... 

Fig. 3.13. (Top) An electron micrograph of an artificial chromatin model composed of T4 DNA and cationic nanoparticles of diameter 15nm. (Bottom) Typical snapshots of a model DNA (semiflexible polyelectrolyte) complexed with cationic nanoparticles. At low salt concentration (Debye screening length m/a = 1), a beads-on-a-string nucleosome-like structure is observed (left), while locally segregated clusters are formed at higher salt concentrations (rn/a = 0.3) (right) (See [46] for more details)...

---