Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Screening constant, determination

Later methods, especially that of Gordy (1955), and later Allred and Rochow (1958) make use of screening constants of the electron strucmre for the nuclear charge of each atom. This determines die attraction between the nucleus of the atom and an electron outside the normal electron complement, and is die effective nuclear charge. The empirical equation for the values of electronegativity obtained in this manner by Allred and Rochow is... [Pg.65]

For the He atom there has been an extremely large number of calculations using all kinds of different methods. The most accurate value has, again, been found with the ECW-SOS method used for H and is a = 1.38319 au[33] (with the atomic unit based on a reduced electron mass appropriate for the He nucleus) the experimental value is 1.38320 0.00007 au[34]. Other accurate values are to be found in Refs. [27], [31], and [35]. We recall that Pauling s value, using his theoretically determined screening constant, was 1.343 au. [Pg.137]

The screening constant, which determines the chemical shift (i.e., T values) can be considered as made up of contributions from four sources 148). [Pg.391]

There has been considerable confusion as far as the calibration of nitrogen NMR spectra is concerned. This situation has not improved very much since the appearance of a comprehensive discussion on the subject, (Id) possibly it has grown worse. Modern spectroscopic techniques, in both 14N and 15N NMR, allow the determination of the positions of nitrogen resonance signals with a precision of the order of 0-1 ppm, but this does not mean that the accuracy of chemical shift determinations is of the same order. Very often careless use of reference compounds may make a precision of 0-1 ppm in signal position quite meaningless from the point of view of differences in actual screening constants. [Pg.136]

Wave function (1) is the standard covalent-ionic resonance of vb theory. The parameter k can take values from k = 0, which corresponds to the pure covalent description of the hydrogen molecule ground state (this is the wave function first considered by Wang [47] when he introduced a variable screening constant into the Heitler-London wave function), through to k — oo, which corresponds to a pure ionic description. The best wave function of the form (1), determined by invoking the variation theorem to determine the optimal screening constant, was first reported by Weinbaum [48] in 1933. [Pg.276]

John C. Slater (1901-1976), American physicist, for 30 years a professor and dean at the Physics Department of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, then at the University of Florida, Gainesville, where he participated in the Quantum Theory Project. His youth was in the stormy period of the intense development of quantum mechanics, and he participated vividly in it. For example, in 1926-1932, he published articles on the ground state of the helium atom, the screening constants (Slater orbitals), the antisymmetrization of the wave function (Slater determinant), and the algorithm for calculating the integrals (the Slater-Condon rules). [Pg.397]


See other pages where Screening constant, determination is mentioned: [Pg.82]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.706]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.384]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.539]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.513]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.3113]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.449]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.1309]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.511]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.479]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.76]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.19 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]




SEARCH



Screening constants

© 2024 chempedia.info