Schematic representation of network

Figure 1.1 Schematic representation of network formation during a reaction between two molecules with functionality of >2...

Fig. 12. Schematic representation of networks formed by extended-chain crystals with cross-linking by (a) bifurcation of the fibrillar crystals or (b) common folded-chain crystals.

Fig. 20. Schematic representation of network structure in which one constituent of a copolymer has formed phase-separated regions while the other constituent has remained in solution.

Figure 13 Schematic representation of networks with covalent and noncovalent cross-links (left), based on the star polyester and polyol depicted on the right. (Reproduced from Ref. 43. American Chanical Society, 2009.)...

Figure 5.16 Schematic representation of the effect of number of crosslinks and initial average molecular weight on network formation... 

Fig. 6. Schematic representation of macroporous PHEMA hydrogel sponges. Interstitial spaces between polymer droplets create a macroporous structure 1-20 pm in size, whereas the polymer network creates a 1-100 nm mesh size in the polymer phase.

Schematic representation of the operation of the nanoparticle network hydrogen sensor.

Figure 5.4 Schematic representation of sol and a part of the gel DC dangling chains, EANC elastically active network chains, EAC elastically active crosslinks...

Figure 20.3 Schematic representation of a three-layered artificial neural network.

Figure 11. Schematic representation of three-dimensional ferrocene networks built from dendritic (7 and 8), cyclic (9), and polyhedral (10) silicon-containing building blocks.

Figure 4.2 Schematic representation of a chemical synapse, the location within a neuronal network where the transfer of information from one netxon to the next tdces placa by means of neurotransmitters...

Figure 1.48 Schematic representation of a random network sodium silicate glass. From W. D. Kingery, H. K. Bowen, and D. R. Uhlmann, Introduction to Ceramics. Copyright 1976 by John Wiley Sons, Inc. This material is used by permission of John Wiley Sons, Inc.

Figure 1 shows a schematic representation of the polymer network obtained by laser curing of a photoresist based on a bis-phenol A epoxy-... 

Figure 1. Schematic representation of a TPGDA-epoxy diacrylate network.

Fig. 6.1. A schematic representation of the random orientation of water dipoles in the interior of the electrolyte (the network structure of water is ignored in the diagram).

Fig. 4. Schematic representation of the observed dynamics. Initially uncomplexed photoacid first forms an encounter complex through diffusion. This loose complex either rearranges to a tight complex, or reacts via the hydrogen bonded network between photoacid and base. A pre-formed photoacid-base complex can directly react with extremely fast rates.

Fig. 16. Schematic representation of phase separation in networks. A phase separation due to increase of % (q0 = 1) B phase separation due to increase...

In addition to the above experimental point, one can raise a theoretical objection against the way in which Volkenstein et al. introduce the effect which the structure in a network has on its elastic behaviour. In their theory the Gaussian chain statistics are left unchanged in spite of the fact that the chain molecules run through bundles. Such a decoupling of chain statistics and bundles is unwarranted. In Fig. 29 c a schematic representation of the approach of Volkenstein et al. to a structured network is given. Only a two chain network is drawn, although it should, of course, be remembered that in reality a bundle structure will comprise parts of many molecules. 

Fig. 29. Schematic representation of a part of a structured network and its theoretical treatment (a) ideal network structure without bundles (b) network with a simple"two chain bundle" (c) theoretical treatment by Volkenstein et al. (174). The separated "bundle illustrates the intactness of the original network chain statistics (d) theoretical treatment by Blokland (14). Each chain has a number of obstructed steps. No relation between the obstructed parts of different chains...

Figure 3. Schematic representation of two different hexagonal arrangements in mesostructured inorganic / surfactant composites the hydrophobic chains are drawn as straight lines for simplicity, (a) The normal structure with a fully-connected inorganic network (dark area), (b) Inverse surfactant assemblies with single domains of the inorganic material enclosed in the centres. In the latter case the hydrophobic surfactant chains are allowed more space for their distribution, leading to a smaller d spacing. In this picture they are also interpenetrating each other.

Figure 4-10 A schematic representation of the gel networks of Sephadex (left) and agarose (right). Note that the aggregates in agarose gels may actually contain 10-104 helices rather than the smaller numbers shown here. From Amott...

Fig. 1. Schematic representation of the mucin polymer network. Notice the tangled topology of the network, the linear conformation of the mucins and the presence of S S bonds in the apomucin backbone...

Figure 29-2 Schematic representation of the conversion of an uncross-linked thermosetting polymer to a highly cross-linked polymer. The crosslinks are shown in a two-dimensional network, but in practice three-dimensional networks are formed.

Figure 7.6 Schematic representation of hard clusters in (a) a polyurethane network composed of a long diol, a triol, and a diisocyanate (polyaddition reactions, Chapter 2). (b) a hybrid inorganic-organic network composed of a silane end-capped long diol (polycondensation reactions, Chapter 2).

---