Scatter direction

The easiest way to proceed is to use vectors to describe this part of the problem. We represent the distance between the pair of scattering sites by the vector OP the length of which is simply r. To express di and d2 in terms of OP we construct the unit vectors a and b which are parallel to the incident and scattered directions, respectively. The projection of OP into direction a, given by the dot product of these two vectors, equals dj. Likewise, the projection of OP into direction b gives d2. Therefore we can write... 

Figure 1 Simplistic schematic illustration of the scattering mechanism upon which X-ray photoelectron diffraction (XPD) is based. An intensity increase is expected in the forward scattering direction, where the scattered and primary waves constructively interfere.

X-Ray diffraction has an important limitation Clear diffraction peaks are only observed when the sample possesses sufficient long-range order. The advantage of this limitation is that the width (or rather the shape) of diffraction peaks carries information on the dimensions of the reflecting planes. Diffraction lines from perfect crystals are very narrow, see for example the (111) and (200) reflections of large palladium particles in Fig. 4.5. For crystallite sizes below 100 nm, however, line broadening occurs due to incomplete destructive interference in scattering directions where the X-rays are out of phase. The two XRD patterns of supported Pd catalysts in Fig. 4.5 show that the reflections of palladium are much broader than those of the reference. The Scherrer formula relates crystal size to line width ... 

Fig. 2. A schematic diagram illustrating how a time delay, r, permits the product molecule of an A + BC reaction to rotate into the forward scattering direction. The frequency u) of the rotating complex is set by the angular momentum of the collision, J, and hence by the impact parameter, b.

Time-of-fhght spectra of the D atom products have been measured at many laboratory angles at both collision energies. Translational energy distributions can be derived by direct conversion of these TOF spectra. For the experiment carried out at 2.0 kcal/mol, Fig. 28(a) shows the total product angular distribution from 0 = —60° to 117.5°, which correspond to the forward (—60°), the sideward (30°) and the backward (117.5°) scattering directions. The direction of the D2 beam is at 0 = 0°, while the direction of the 0(XD) beam is at 0/. 90°. By definition, the forwardness and back-... 

Fig. 29. The CM product translational energy distributions at the forward and backward scattering direction for the 0(1D) +D2 — OD + D reaction at two collision energies (a) 2.0 kcal/mol, and (b) 3.2 kcal/mol.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the DCS for the H + D2 —> HD + H reaction exhibits pronounced oscillatory structures in the backward scattering direction both in experimental and in theory. The physical origin of this structure has been traced to the opening of a sequence of quantized transition state thresholds. 

Unlike the wave function, the electron density can be experimentally determined via X-ray diffraction because X-rays are scattered by electrons. A diffraction experiment yields an angular pattern of scattered X-ray beam intensities from which structure factors can be obtained after careful data processing. The structure factors F(H), where H are indices denoting a particular scattering direction, are the Fourier transform of the unit cell electron density. Therefore we can obtain p(r) experimentally via ... 

The definition of the final quantum state [see Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4)] of the system includes the direction k into which the separating fragments are scattered. If we omit the integrals over all final scattering directions in Eqs. (4.1) and (4.10), we obtain a cross section for scattering into a specific final direction. These are called differential cross sections. Below 1 will briefly outline the definition and properties of the partial differential cross section, which is the probability of producing a specific final quantum state of the system scattered into a well-specified direction. 

The most detailed possible photofragmentation cross section is the detailed final-state resolved differential photofragmentation cross section defined in Eq. (4.12), which measures the probability of the formation of a particular final state, vj,m.j scattered into a specified scattering direction, k = 0, 4>j. This cross section has been discussed in Ref. 80 in the context of time-independent... 

The phase relations among the scattered wavelets depend on geometrical factors scattering direction, size, and shape. But the amplitude and phase of the induced dipole moment for a given frequency depend on the material of which the particle js composed. Thus, for a full understanding of scattering und absorption by small particles, we need to know how bulk matter responds to oscillatory electromagnetic fields this is the subject of Chapters 9 and 10. 

It is instructive to consider how p varies with scattering angle 0 for the two azimuthal angles 0° and 90°. For scattering directions in a plane perpendicular to the cylinder axis the phase function p 0,90°) is pe(0,90°)sin2(xsin ), where the envelope... 

We need consider only scattering directions in the plane = tt/2 (or < > = 377/2) because p vanishes outside this plane we also have 0 = 0 when = 77/2 and 0 = - 6 when = 377/2, where 0 = 0 is the forward direction. Thus, we may take the phase function for scattering by an infinite cylinder in the diffraction theory approximation to be... 

---