Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Scanning electron micrographs of starches

Figure 4-6 Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules. Magnification 2500x and 3000x. From Jane et alP... Figure 4-6 Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules. Magnification 2500x and 3000x. From Jane et alP...
FIGURE 6.5 Scanning electron micrograph of starch granules isolated from Eleusine (Jideani et al., 1996. Reproduced with permission from Cereal Chemistry). [Pg.232]

Figure 5.15 Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules after mild a-amylolysis showing the occurrence of spherical bl ocklet-l I ke structures, (a) potato and (b) wheat starch granules. (Adapted with permission from reference 1)... Figure 5.15 Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules after mild a-amylolysis showing the occurrence of spherical bl ocklet-l I ke structures, (a) potato and (b) wheat starch granules. (Adapted with permission from reference 1)...
Figure 6.1 Scanning electron micrographs of starches (a) normal maize (b) waxy maize (c) potato (d) wheat (e) sorghum (f) sweet corn (g) amaranth (h) high-amylose maize 7.10... [Pg.196]

FIG. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules from (a) maize, 1500X (b) potato, 1500X (c) rice, 5000X and (d) tapioca, 1500X. From Fitt and Snyder (1984). [Pg.17]

Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules from nine different botanical sources A, potato B, rice C, wheat D, mung bean E, maize F, waxy maize G, tapioca H, shot J, leaf starch. Magnification 1500X for each starch... [Pg.1443]

Figure 6.2. Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules A, maize B, potato C, wheat D, rye E, rice F, lentil bean G, green pea H, avocado I, shod. From ref. [2], reprinted by permission of the author and publisher. Figure 6.2. Scanning electron micrographs of starch granules A, maize B, potato C, wheat D, rye E, rice F, lentil bean G, green pea H, avocado I, shod. From ref. [2], reprinted by permission of the author and publisher.
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of Phaseolus vulgaris cotyledon showing protein bodies (P) and starch granules (S). Bar = 10 dm. Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of Phaseolus vulgaris cotyledon showing protein bodies (P) and starch granules (S). Bar = 10 dm.
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of cryofractured film containing 40% starch, 60% LDPE + EAA 5ter 64 days of soil burial. Top of photo shows film surface bottom shows film interior. Bar = 20 jum. Figure 1. Scanning electron micrograph of cryofractured film containing 40% starch, 60% LDPE + EAA 5ter 64 days of soil burial. Top of photo shows film surface bottom shows film interior. Bar = 20 jum.
Figure 5.21 Scanning electron micrographs of maize starch granules after ot-amylolysis showing resistant shells composed of blocklet-like structures (a) at internal canal of corrosion level and (b) at shells level. (Gallant, unpublished)... Figure 5.21 Scanning electron micrographs of maize starch granules after ot-amylolysis showing resistant shells composed of blocklet-like structures (a) at internal canal of corrosion level and (b) at shells level. (Gallant, unpublished)...
Figure 16.2 Scanning electron micrographs of normal (CDC Dawn, Phoenix, SR 93102, and SB 94860) waxy (CDC Alamo, CDC Candle, SB 9491 2, and SB 94917) and high-amylose (SB 94893 and SB 94897) barley starches.115 (Reproduced with permission)... Figure 16.2 Scanning electron micrographs of normal (CDC Dawn, Phoenix, SR 93102, and SB 94860) waxy (CDC Alamo, CDC Candle, SB 9491 2, and SB 94917) and high-amylose (SB 94893 and SB 94897) barley starches.115 (Reproduced with permission)...
Fig. 3 Scanning electron micrograph of pregelatinized starch (magnification lOOx). Fig. 3 Scanning electron micrograph of pregelatinized starch (magnification lOOx).
Scanning electron micrograph of potato starch granule treated with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ce-amylase, showing growth rings of the crystalline -amylase resistant starch in the granule... [Pg.1445]

FIG. 6. Scanning electron micrograph of muscle fiber covered with a layer of crystalline sucrose (arrows). Starch cell fragments labeled C are also shown. Source Chang et aL (1991). Reproduced with kind permission from Elsevier Science Ltd. [Pg.134]

FIG. 4 Scanning electron micrographs of sweet potato starch granules (Miller et al,... [Pg.19]

Figure 15.6 Scanning electron micrographs of fragile fractnres of starch/natural rubber blends, (a) 20 per cent glycerol and 5 per cent rabber, (b) 30 per cent glycerol and 20 per cent rabber, (c) 40 per cent glycerol and 5 per cent rabber and (d) 40 per cent glycerol and 20 per cent rubber. AH quantities are in w/w based on dry matter. Reproduced with permission from Reference [112]. Figure 15.6 Scanning electron micrographs of fragile fractnres of starch/natural rubber blends, (a) 20 per cent glycerol and 5 per cent rabber, (b) 30 per cent glycerol and 20 per cent rabber, (c) 40 per cent glycerol and 5 per cent rabber and (d) 40 per cent glycerol and 20 per cent rubber. AH quantities are in w/w based on dry matter. Reproduced with permission from Reference [112].
Fig. 6.2A-C. Scanning electron micrographs of a median cross section of a wheat grain to show modification of the endosperm after (A) 1 day and (B) 2 days. (C) shows the partially hydrolysed starch grain in the sub-aleurone endosperm of grain modified for 4 days. In (A) a region of weakness has been arrowed where the endosperm is becoming modified close to the aleurone (A) layer. In (B) the aleurone layer remains adhered to the seed coat. From Fincher and Stone, 1974 [50]... Fig. 6.2A-C. Scanning electron micrographs of a median cross section of a wheat grain to show modification of the endosperm after (A) 1 day and (B) 2 days. (C) shows the partially hydrolysed starch grain in the sub-aleurone endosperm of grain modified for 4 days. In (A) a region of weakness has been arrowed where the endosperm is becoming modified close to the aleurone (A) layer. In (B) the aleurone layer remains adhered to the seed coat. From Fincher and Stone, 1974 [50]...
Figure 1 Scanning electron micrograph of the surface of extrusion-blown LDPE film containing 10% of maize starch. As the extruded tube is inflated and stretched, characteristic mounds are raised by the solid starch particles, average diameter 15gm. Magnification circa x350,... Figure 1 Scanning electron micrograph of the surface of extrusion-blown LDPE film containing 10% of maize starch. As the extruded tube is inflated and stretched, characteristic mounds are raised by the solid starch particles, average diameter 15gm. Magnification circa x350,...
FIGURE 4.1 Scanning electron micrographs of cassava starch baked foam, (a) Tray snrface in contact with the top snrface of the mold and (b) tray surface in contact with the bottom surface of the mold. (From authors data not published.)... [Pg.80]

FIGURE 4.2 Scanning electron micrographs of extruded foams formulated as follows (a) 100% starch/PVA and (b) 70% starch/PVA, 2% chitosan, and 28% fibers. (From Debiagi F. et al., 2011, Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 54, 1043-1052.)... [Pg.83]

FIGURE 4.4 Scanning electron micrographs of foam trays cross sections based on (a) cassava starch (b) 95% cassava starch and 5% Cloisite lOA, and (c) 95% cassava starch and 5% Cloisite SOB. (From Matsuda D. N. K. et al., 2012, Industrial Crops and Products, http //dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.08.032.)... [Pg.88]

Figure 7.10 Scanning electron micrographs of the fractured surface of (A) glycerol, (B) xylitol, (C) sorbitol and (D) maltitol plasticized starch. Reprinted with permission from A. P. Mathew and A. Dufresne, Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3, 1101-1108. Copyright 2002 American Chemical Society. Figure 7.10 Scanning electron micrographs of the fractured surface of (A) glycerol, (B) xylitol, (C) sorbitol and (D) maltitol plasticized starch. Reprinted with permission from A. P. Mathew and A. Dufresne, Biomacromolecules, 2002, 3, 1101-1108. Copyright 2002 American Chemical Society.
Figure 10.4 Scanning electron micrographs of (a-d] coir fiber subjected to different treatments [a untreated b washed c mercerized d bleached] and their composites [e-f starch/EVOH and untreated coir g-h starch/EVOH and washed coir i-j starch/ EVOH and mercerized coir k-1 starch/EVOH and blenched coir] [22]. Figure 10.4 Scanning electron micrographs of (a-d] coir fiber subjected to different treatments [a untreated b washed c mercerized d bleached] and their composites [e-f starch/EVOH and untreated coir g-h starch/EVOH and washed coir i-j starch/ EVOH and mercerized coir k-1 starch/EVOH and blenched coir] [22].
Figure 1 Scanning electron micrographs of (a) rye grass (Lolium perenne) pollen surrounded by starch granules and (b) starch granules. (Courtesy of Prof Frank Murray, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.)... Figure 1 Scanning electron micrographs of (a) rye grass (Lolium perenne) pollen surrounded by starch granules and (b) starch granules. (Courtesy of Prof Frank Murray, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.)...
Figure 1. Scanning electron micrographs of (a) as received Argo com starch, and an 80/20 wt% HDPE/starch blend made by (b) pulverization and (c) melt-mixing. Size bars = 25 otm. [Pg.2505]

Figure 8.2 Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of potato starch. Figure 8.2 Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of potato starch.
Figure 10.1 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of starches separated from different sources (a) rice, (b) wheat, (c) potato, (d) maize (bar= 10 mm) (source Singh et al., 2003). Figure 10.1 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of starches separated from different sources (a) rice, (b) wheat, (c) potato, (d) maize (bar= 10 mm) (source Singh et al., 2003).
Figure 10.3 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) featuring (a) the presence of some small size nodules or protuberances on some potato starch granules and (b) surface fragmentation on some potato starch granules (source Singh et al., 2006). Figure 10.3 Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) featuring (a) the presence of some small size nodules or protuberances on some potato starch granules and (b) surface fragmentation on some potato starch granules (source Singh et al., 2006).
Fig. la-C Scanning electron micrographs showing the surface of LDPE-starch films with 7.7% starch a before ageing b after ageing in sterile mineral medium and c after ageing in biotic mineral medium inoculated with A. paraffineus... [Pg.184]

Figure 6.4 (a) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of a remaining normal maize starch granule after 84% starch has... [Pg.199]


See other pages where Scanning electron micrographs of starches is mentioned: [Pg.1442]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.1442]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.386]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.482]    [Pg.1444]    [Pg.978]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.497]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.186]    [Pg.198]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.196 , Pg.198 , Pg.199 ]




SEARCH



Electron micrograph

Electron micrographs

Electron micrographs, scanning

Scanning electron micrograph

Scanning electron micrographic

Starch micrograph

© 2024 chempedia.info