Scalar elastic model

Modulus-frequency master curves have been constructed by applying appropriate time dependent renormalisation factors to the frequency and modulus individual data. From the scaling of these factors with reaction time, the static scaling exponents t and s have been calculated and observed to be independent of the chemical nature of the midblock, suggesting a unique gelation mechanism. For all the samples, 1.84scalar elasticity percolation model. 

In this section, pedagogical models for the time dependence of mechanical response are developed. Elastic stress and strain are rank-two tensors, and the compliance (or stiffness) are rank-four material property tensors that connect them. In this section, a simple spring and dashpot analog is used to model the mechanical response of anelastic materials. Scalar forces in the spring and dashpot model become analogs for a more complex stress tensor in materials. To enforce this analogy, we use the terms stress and strain below, but we do not treat them as tensors. 

External stress, locally applied, can have nonlocal static effects in ferroelastics (see Fig. 4 of Ref. [7]). Dynamical evolution of strains under local external stress can show striking time-dependent patterns such as elastic photocopying of the applied deformations, in an expanding texture (see Fig.5 of Ref. [8]). Since charges and spins can couple linearly to strain, they are like internal (unit-cell) local stresses, and one might expect extended strain response in all (compatibility-linked) strain-tensor components. Quadratic coupling is like a local transition temperature. The model we consider is a (scalar) free energy density term... 

The Born model [74], for example, satisfies the first condition however, it does not satisfy the second one because in it the longitudinal and transverse elastic constants of the linear chain of bonds (the lattice analog of a rod) decrease /V 1 however, the rods must behave more pliably in relation to transverse shifts (the elastic constant decreases L-3). Therefore, the Born scalar model leads to enhanced rigidity in the vicinity of pc. 

Note that according to Eqs. (15) and (16) the free Helmholtz energy serves as a potential for the stresses T and for the microstructural flux S. According to the assumption of elastic material behavior, results of this type have to be expected. The additional balance equation for k [Eq. (17)] possesses the same structure as the balance of equihbrated forces obtained in Refs. [14, 20, 33] and appHed, e.g., in Ref [36]. Following the MuUer-Liu approach, Svendsen [39] also derived a generalization of Eq. (17) for a model with scalar-valued stractural parameters. 

It is interesting to note that haversian bones, whether human or bovine, have both their compressive and shear anisotropy factors considerably lower than the respective values for plexiform bone. Thus, not only is plexiform bone both stiffer and more rigid than haversian bone, it is also more anisotropic. These two scalar anisotropy quantities also provide a means of assessing whether there is the possibility either of systematic errors in the measurements or artifacts in the modeling of the elastic properties of hard tissues. This is determined when the values of Ac (%) and/or As (%) are much greater than the close range of lower values obtained by calculations on a variety of different ultrasonic measurements (Table 47.5). A possible example of this is the value of As (%) = 7.88 calculated from the mechanical testing data of Knets [1978], Table 47.2. 

It would have been possible to choose another way, by using inductances and capacitances instead of reluctances and elastances, to express entity numbers (impulses p, or basic quantities q) in function of energies-per-entity (flows fg, or efforts e ) for the inductive and capacitive influences, but models are found to be more complex in that case, except when operators reduce to scalars, in which case both ways are equivalent and equally convenient. The Formal Graphs in Graph 7.1 translate these two systems of equations. 

GRAPH 11.29 Two Fourier-transformed Formal Graphs depicting the equivalence between an apparent elasticity modulus (a) and the sum of individual paths modeling the relaxation (b). (In the linear case, the Fourier transformations of the system constitutive properties are replaced by scalars.)... 

The difference between nematic and isotropic elastomers is simply the molecular shape anisotropy induced by the LC order, as discussed in Sect. 2. The simplest approach to nematic rubber elasticity is an extension of classical molecular mbber elasticity using the so-called neo-classical Gaussian chain model [64] see also Warner and Terentjev [4] for a detailed presentation. Imagine an elastomer formed in the isotropic phase and characterized by a scalar step length Iq. After cooling down to a monodomain nematic state, the chains obtain an anisotropic shape described by the step lengths tensor Ig. For this case the stress-strain relation can be written as ... 

Fig. 28. Real optical potential strengths in infinite nuclear matter of the scalar and vector potentials for medium energy protons based on the RIA model with pseudoscalar invariant (solid curves) and the one-meson exchange model using the pseudovector invariant with explicit direct and exchange terms (dashed curves). Results of Dirac phenomenology [Ha 90] for p + °Ca elastic scattering (potentials evaluated at r = 0) are shown by the dotted curves.

In this respect, a theory that takes into account the deformation of one droplet (Doi and Ohta 1991) can be applied to describe the shear and normal stress transients. According to this model, blend morphology is characterized by a scalar (referring to a specific interfacial area) and a tensor (characterizing interface anisotropy). These parameters may be expressed in two equations—one describing the stresses of the interfacial structures and the other for the evaluation of the scalar and interface tensor. For immiscible blends with Newtonian or weakly viscoelastic fluids and an increase in shear, the droplets deform into fibrils while maintaining their initial diameter, d. In comparison, in a highly elastic matrix where droplet shape is... 

---