Row effects

Fig. 6.2 Effects thought to be responsible for pore wall passivation (top row). Effects that can lead to passivation breakdown at the...

Three additional rows labelled Total , Divisor and Effect , are added. Each element of the Total row is obtained by adding the response elements taking into account the signs of the column under consideration e.g. for A Total = — 821- 88 — 82 + 86 — 81 +84 - 85 + 89 = 17). Divisor elements are half of the number of runs, except for column I, which is exactly the number of runs. The last row, Effect , is just the ratio of the elements in the respective Total and Divisor rows (A effect = 17/4 = 4.25). 

The first hypothesis says that there is no row effect, that is, the means across rows have the same value. Similarly, the second hypothesis says there is no column effect. The two hypotheses above can be written equivalently as ... 

Spyders are another cultivation tool that may be used to control weeds in the com row. Spyders use toothed disks to move soil away from the crop row on the first two cultivations and to move soil into the crop row on the third cultivation to cover up small weed seedlings (Schweizer et al., 1994). Tools that uproot weeds in the row are called torsion weeders, spinners, and spring-hoe weeders. These designs cause the cultivator to create a vibration as the implement passes through the soil near the crop row, effectively dislodging the weed seedlings (Doll and Francis, 1992). 

In addition to polarity effects due to electronegativity differences, polarisability should also be considered. The larger polarisability of second row substituents and of bonds with second row atoms may contribute to the occurence of a specific second row effect . 

Factorial design can be applied to any number of factors and levels. Frequently, in exploratory work, only two levels of each factor are chosen for the factorial design. Two factors and two levels constitute a 22 factorial design and permit setting up a 2 x 2 analysis-of-variance table with one factor on columns and another on rows. By determining the row effect and the column effect, it is possible to determine, for example in a reactor, whether a variation in temperature or pressure affects the reaction yield. A choice of substantially different values of temperature and pressure would be desirable to ensure conclusions which would be based on a wide range of factors. 

Metal Effects on Metal-carbonyl Reactivity. The effect of the metal center on organometaUic reactivity is not as clearly defined as for coordination complexes. We will examine (a) the effect of charge, (b) first-row, second-row, and third-row effects and (c) the effect of d-electron count. As will be discussed in Section 4.1, the enhanced reactivity of odd-electron complexes is a major effect of the metal center. 

Row (R) and column (C) effects are estimated using a median polish procedure to score the relative potency of actives on a plate-by-plate basis, yijp = value at the f row and column on the plate p,p = plate center mean Ri = row effect Cj = column effect Cyp = error in measurement... 

FIGURE 8.62. (Top row) Effects proposed to be responsible for pore wall passivation. (Middle row) Effects responsible for passivation breakdown at the pore tip. (Bottom row) The resulting kind of porous silicon structure together with substrate doping type. (Reprinted from Lehmann et 2000, with permission from Elsevier Science.)... 

Some detailed results are available for condensing in bundles of enhanced tubes. Withers and Young [157] found, for example, that the vertical row effect for corrugated tubes was different from that for bare tubes in particular, the enhanced tubes were less sensitive to the number of rows. 

FIGURE 17.46 A correction factor Fc to take into account the tube-row effect for heat transfer for flow normal to bare tubebanks. 

Row Effects. In general, the reactivity is greatest for the second-row metal and least for the third-row metal. This order is different from the order of reactivity observed for classical coordination complexes, for which the reactivity decreases down a row for analogous complexes. The change of reactivity across a row has not been examined to any significant extent. The order of... 

Like the isoelectronic Pd and Pt, Au exhibits both /rows-effects and Ira j-influence. Table 4.13 (above) lists structural data for a number of complexes AUL3L, showing how the disparity in Au-X distances between cis-and trans-X depends on the position of L in the trans-effect series for the compounds listed, the elfect is least noticeable in AUCI3NH3 as these two ligands are proximate in the series. 

---