Role of Organic Templates and Drawbacks Associated to Calcination

Role of Organic Templates and Drawbacks Associated to Calcination 

Most of the microporous and mesoporous compounds require the use of structure-directing molecules under hydro(solvo)thermal conditions [14, 15, 171, 172]. A serious handicap is the application of high-temperature calcination to develop their porosity. It usually results in inferior textural and acidic properties, and even full structural collapse occurs in the case of open frameworks, (proto) zeolites containing small-crystalline domains, and mesostructures. These materials can show very interesting properties if their structure could be fully maintained. A principal question is, is there any alternative to calcination. There is a manifested interest to find alternatives to calcination to show the potential of new structures. 

The organic templating approach was first introduced by Barrer and Deimy 

MicrocrystalUne zeolites such as beta zeolite suffer from calcination. The crystallinity is decreased and the framework can be notably dealuminated by the steam generated [175]. Potential Br0nsted catalytic sites are lost and heteroatoms migrate to extra-framework positions, leading to a decrease in catalytic performance. Nanocrystals and ultrafine zeolite particles display aggregation issues, difficulties in regeneration, and low thermal and hydrothermal stabilities. Therefore, calcination is sometimes not the optimal protocol to activate such systems. Application of zeolites for coatings, patterned thin-films, and membranes usually is associated with defects and cracks upon template removal. 

It must be noted that sometimes calcination is beneficial to create active species. Notable examples are the Sn-beta speciation [176] and generation of extra-framework Al-Lewis sites in beta zeolite for organic transformations 

---