Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Rock-mass input data

Hudson, J. A. Andersson, J., 2003. T-H-M-C modelling of rock mass behaviour 2 - the input data and rock mass partitioning. Proceedings of the GEOPROC2003 conference, Stockholm. [Pg.438]

This example, with its generic extrapolation, means that in the numerical modelling consideration must be given to the procedure for dealing with the separate components of the input data. This may involve alternative and sequential rock mass domain partitioning, as described in Hudson and Harrison (2002). [Pg.441]

In this Part II paper, we have concentrated on the input data for T-H-M-C modelling and the associated problem of partitioning the rock mass into domains within each one of which the rock properties are assumed to be constant... [Pg.443]

We concluded the Part I paper stating that the full development of T-H-M-C modelling is still at an early stage and it is not evident whether current codes provide the information that is required. This also applies to the input data and rock mass partitioning Part II conclusion we have practical techniques for obtaining the input information for simple codes, but not for the new generation of T-H-M-C codes — which require a more systematic and overall approach to the problems described herein. [Pg.444]

Fig. 6) they are presented in Table 1 as materials 4, 5, 6 belonging to the tuff layers. The properties of effusive rock mass are defined via material 7, and properties of interlayers consisting of andesites, diorites, porphyrites are determined by material 8 those of faults - by materials 9, 11 (properties of faults 1, D, V are determined by material 9, and the rest ones - by the 11-th material). Vertical faults penetrate the modeled area from the bottom boundary to the 3-rd layer foot. In this case, the finite-difference scheme plotting accounts for the fault thickness, which was assumed to be 5 m. The input data for numerical study were taken after a series of preliminary calculations, Krashin (2002). [Pg.681]

Many graduate employees are really at home manipulating data in complicated design packages and yet they don t have a feel for whether the data they are inputting is likely to be meaningful and representative of the soil or rock in question. This is often because they haven t been taught how to start at first principles and get a proper feel for how material is likely to behave at both the material and mass scales. [Pg.49]


See other pages where Rock-mass input data is mentioned: [Pg.517]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.439]    [Pg.562]    [Pg.332]    [Pg.442]    [Pg.1413]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.383]    [Pg.53]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 , Pg.439 ]




SEARCH



Input data

Rock mass

© 2024 chempedia.info