Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Return fraction

Alternative wind models assume a selective outflow of enriched material, either taking place at the time of star formation bursts in dwarf galaxies (Matteucci Tosi 1985) or taking place continuously from the hot component of the ISM which is also assumed to be metal-enriched (Vader 1987 Ferreras, Scannapieco Silk 2002). An analytical model by Lynden-Bell (1992) supposes that, of the return fraction 1 — a from a generation of stars, a fraction 1 — / escapes, leading via Eq. (7.34) to... [Pg.366]

Ir = Interest rate of return (fraction/year) t = Time (y)... [Pg.205]

THE SUBROUTINE ACCEPTS BOTH A LIQUID FEED OF COMPOSITION XF AT TEMPERATURE TL(K) AND A VAPOR FEED OF COMPOSITION YF AT TVVAPOR FRACTION OF THE FEED BEING VF (MOL BASIS). FDR AN ISOTHERMAL FLASH THE TEMPERATURE T(K) MUST ALSO BE SUPPLIED. THE SUBROUTINE DETERMINES THE V/F RATIO A, THE LIQUID AND VAPOR PHASE COMPOSITIONS X ANO Y, AND FOR AN ADIABATIC FLASHf THE TEMPERATURE T(K). THE EQUILIBRIUM RATIOS K ARE ALSO PROVIDED. IT NORMALLY RETURNS ERF=0 BUT IF COMPONENT COMBINATIONS LACKING DATA ARE INVOLVED IT RETURNS ERF=lf ANO IF NO SOLUTION IS FOUND IT RETURNS ERF -2. FOR FLASH T.LT.TB OR T.GT.TD FLASH RETURNS ERF=3 OR 4 RESPECTIVELY, AND FOR BAD INPUT DATA IT RETURNS ERF=5. [Pg.322]

OESISNATEOI. T FRACTION OF THE SYSTEM GOINS INTO THE E PHASE IS RETURNED IN A, MITH A BEING 0 OP 1 (AND XEsXP) IF Z IS IN A SINGLE... [Pg.336]

The ammonium hydrogensulphate is returned to the electrolytic cell. A process such as this yields an aqueous solution containing about 30% hydrogen peroxide. The solution can be further concentrated, yielding ultimately pure hydrogen peroxide, by fractional distillation but the heating of concentrated hydrogen peroxide solutions requires care (see below). [Pg.278]

This rarity value is equated with the fraction of hits that would be returned by searching large database of diverse molecules with the full pharmacophore (all K features) or thi subset (with K—1 features) as appropriate. Labelling this fraction of hits as p(x) we nov define q x) as the fraction of the M active molecules (i.e. the molecules originally suppliet as input to the procedure) which match each of the K + possible classes. The overal configuration is scored using ... [Pg.673]

Reflux ratio. This is defined as the ratio between the number of moles of vapour returned as refluxed liquid to the fractionating column and the number of moles of final product (collected as distillate), both per unit time. The reflux ratio should be varied according to the difficulty of fractionation, rather than be maintained constant a high efficiency of separation requires a liigh reflux ratio. ... [Pg.95]

Fig. II, 17, 2 illustrates a fractional distillation unit f for use with glass helices. The column is provided with an electrically-heated jacket the resistance shown in the Figure may be replaced by a variable transformer. The still head is of the total-condensation variable take-off type aU the vapour at the top of the column is condensed, a portion of the condensate is returned to the column by means of the special stopcock (permitting of... Fig. II, 17, 2 illustrates a fractional distillation unit f for use with glass helices. The column is provided with an electrically-heated jacket the resistance shown in the Figure may be replaced by a variable transformer. The still head is of the total-condensation variable take-off type aU the vapour at the top of the column is condensed, a portion of the condensate is returned to the column by means of the special stopcock (permitting of...
Table 2.26a lists the height of an ordinate (Y) as a distance z from the mean, and Table 2.26b the area under the normal curve at a distance z from the mean, expressed as fractions of the total area, 1.000. Returning to Fig. 2.10, we note that 68.27% of the area of the normal distribution curve lies within 1 standard deviation of the center or mean value. Therefore, 31.73% lies outside those limits and 15.86% on each side. Ninety-five percent (actually 95.43%) of the area lies within 2 standard deviations, and 99.73% lies within 3 standard deviations of the mean. Often the last two areas are stated slightly different viz. 95% of the area lies within 1.96cr (approximately 2cr) and 99% lies within approximately 2.5cr. The mean falls at exactly the 50% point for symmetric normal distributions. [Pg.194]

The logic that leads us to this last result also limits the applicability of the ensuing derivation. Applying the fraction of total lattice sites vacant to the immediate vicinity of the first segment makes the model descriptive of a relatively concentrated solution. This is somewhat novel in itself, since theories of solutions more commonly assume dilute conditions. More to the point, the model is unrealistic for dilute solutions where the site occupancy within the domain of a dissolved polymer coil is greater than that for the solution as a whole. We shall return to a model more appropriate for dilute solutions below. For now we continue with the case of the more concentrated solution, realizing... [Pg.514]

Now we return to consider the energy that must be dissipated in a unit volume of suspension to produce a unit gradient, as we did above with the pure solvent. The same fraction applied to the shearing force will produce the unit gradient, and the same fraction also describes the volume rate of energy dissipation compared to the situation described above for pure solvent. Since the latter was Po, we write for the suspension, in the case of dv/dy = 1,... [Pg.588]

The turbulent fluidized bed has a similar or slightly lower soHds volume fraction than the vigorously bubbling bed. There is considerable transport of soHds out of the turbulent bed and the bed level is not very distinct. Large-scale cyclones are needed to return soHds to the bed. On average, the bed inventory passes through the cyclones several times per hour. [Pg.74]

Purification Processes. Separation of neutral and polar Hpids, so-called deoiling, is the most important fractionation process in lecithin technology (Fig. 3). Lecithin is fluidized by adding 15—30% acetone under intensive agitation with acetone (fluidized lecithin acetone, 1 5) at 5°C. The mixture goes to a separator where it is agitated for 30 minutes. The agitator is then stopped and the lecithin separates. The oil micella is removed and the acetone evaporated. After condensation the acetone is returned into the process. [Pg.100]


See other pages where Return fraction is mentioned: [Pg.238]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.879]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.244]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.360]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.373]    [Pg.879]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.372]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.525]    [Pg.567]    [Pg.599]    [Pg.1004]    [Pg.425]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.488]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.33]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.238 , Pg.245 , Pg.366 , Pg.372 ]




SEARCH



RETURN

Returnability

© 2024 chempedia.info