Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Restricted open-shell formalism

All calculations were carried out within the approximation of intermediate neglect of differential overlap (37-42) (INDO-RHF-SCF) which includes parameterization for transition metals. A restricted open-shell formalism, developed by Zerner et al. (37,38), was employed to prevent spin contamination and to make the quantitative evaluation of the relative spin state energies possible. This method has been used successfully to study simple transition metal complexes like [FeCl ]" (42), [CuCl ]2" ( ), and ferrocene ( ) as well as larger and more complicated systems like model oxyheme (61) and carbonylheme ( ) and model oxyhorseradish peroxidase ( ) complexes. [Pg.342]

Often confused with spin delocalization, spin polarization, discussed in Sect. 14.5, is a different phenomenon. It introduces spin densities in orbitals of different symmetries than the SOMOs, for instance in the a system of n radicals. While spin delocalization is well described by restricted open-shell formalisms, spin... [Pg.362]

The coefficients c i are given by the solution of the corresponding SCF equation (equation 2). d s the diagonal matrix with the MO energies. For consideration of Cl we must distinguish between closed-shell systems and open-shell systems. For closed-shell systems the restricted Hartree-Fock (RHF) formalism is applied, whereas for open-shell systems one has the choice between the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) or the restricted open-shell formalism (ROHF). The Fock matrix elements were formulated on the CNDO, INDO and NDDO level by Sauer et al. ... [Pg.508]

Chapter 13 discusses coupled-cluster theory. Important concepts such as connected and disconnected clusters, the exponential ansatz, and size-extensivity are discussed the Unked and unlinked equations of coupled-clustCT theory are compared and the optimization of the wave function is described. Brueckner theory and orbital-optimized coupled-cluster theory are also discussed, as are the coupled-cluster variational Lagrangian and the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster model. A large section is devoted to the coupled-cluster singles-and-doubles (CCSD) model, whose working equations are derived in detail. A discussion of a spin-restricted open-shell formalism concludes the chapter. [Pg.546]

The few attempts at describing excited states in transition metal complexes within the restricted Hartree Fock (RHF) formalism were rapidly abandoned because of computational difficulties (convergence of the low-lying states in the open-shell formalism) and theoretical deficiencies (inherent lack... [Pg.3810]

Kohn-Sham formalism, which suffers from the spin contamination problem, and on the sum-over-states or coupled perturbed Kohn-Sham approaches. In recent articles devoted to computations of elechonic g-tensors we advocated the use of an alternative approach, namely linear response theory based on the spin-restricted open-shell Kohn-Sham formalism, which is free from spin contamination problem (see Theory section). In the following we briefly review the applicability of this approach for some paramagnetic compounds. [Pg.201]

The few attempts at describing excited states in transition metal complexes within the Restricted Hartree Fock (RHF) formalism were rapidly abandoned due to the computational difficulties (convergence of the low-lying states in the open-shell formalism) and theoretical deficiencies (inherent lack of electronic correlation, inconsistent treatment of states of different multiplicities and d shell occupations). The simplest and most straightforward method to deal with correlation energy errors is the Configuration Interaction (Cl) approach where the single determinant HF wave function is extended to a wave function composed of a linear combination of many de-... [Pg.128]

This condition is completely equivalent to the matrix eigenvalue statement but is of more formal value as we shall see later when considering the restricted open shell SCF equations. However it cannot be made the basis of a strategy for obtaining the actual solutions of the SCF equations. [Pg.439]

In the final Section 3.8, we leave the restricted closed-shell formalism and derive and illustrate unrestricted open-shell calculations. We do not discuss restricted open-shell calculations. By procedures that are strictly analogous to those used in deriving the Roothaan equations of Section 3.4, we derive the corresponding unrestricted open-shell equations of Pople and Nesbet. To illustrate the formalism and the results of unrestricted calculations, we apply our standard basis sets to a description of the electronic structure and ESR spectra of the methyl radical, the ionization potential of N2, and the orbital structure of the triplet ground state of O2. Finally, we describe in some detail the application of unrestricted wave functions to the improper behavior of restricted closed-shell wave functions upon dissociation. We again use our minimal basis H2 model to make the discussion concrete. [Pg.111]

The analysis starts with a restricted open-shell Kohn-Sham (ROKS) calculation on the HS state. If necessary, the magnetic orbitals are transformed to the representation with local orthogonal orbitals a and b, as shown in the first column of Fig. 5.11. Staying within the spin-restricted formalism makes that for each a orbital a orbital can be found which has the same spatial part. In the first step, the direct exchange is estimated from the energy difference of the HS(ROKS) and a BS determinant in which only the spin of one of the unpaired electrons is inverted, but neither the core nor the magnetic orbitals are optimized. [Pg.157]

Abstract An expression for the square of the spin operator expectation valne, S, is obtained for a general complex Hartree-Fock wave fnnction and decomposed into four contributions the main one whose expression is formally identical to the restricted (open-shell) Hartree-Fock expression. A spin contamination one formally analogous to that found for spin nnrestricted Hartree-Fock wave functions. A noncollinearity contribntion related to the fact that the wave fnnction is not an eigenfunction of the spin- S operator. A perpendicularity contribution related to the fact that the spin density is not constrained to be zero in the xy-plane. All these contributions are evaluated and compared for the H2O+ system. The optimization of the collinearity axis is also considered. [Pg.172]

We shall follow the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) formalism for obtaining the restricted open-shell HF (ROHF) functions to derive the Hartree-Fock equations for excited states. For the sake of simplicity, we restrict our attention to the first excited state. The problem can be described as ... [Pg.188]

For a closed-shell system, the spin-up and spin-down Fock operators are equal and the spin-orbitals are obtained in pairs of equal shape and energy. Instead of dividing the set of orbitals into spin-up and spin-down orbitals, it is also possible to pursue a division into closed-shell and open-shell orbitals. This leads to the restricted open-shell HF (ROHF) method [23-25]. The formalism for this method is slightly more involved than the UHF formalism, but the general ideas are identical. The ROHF wavefunction is an eigenfunction of the total spin squared (5 ) operator, while the UHF wavefunction does not have this feature. The energy of the UHF wavefunction, on the other hand, is lower than that of the ROHF wavefunc-... [Pg.179]

In our notation j4 r) represents an atomic orbital and c the corresponding molecular orbital coefficient. To avoid unnecessary complications in the presentation we restrict ourselves to the closed-shell case. The extension to the open-shell formalism (Binkley et al. 1974 Pople and Nesbet 1954 Roothaan 1960) is straightforward. With the LCGTO expansion we find for the electron density Eq. 16.4 ... [Pg.578]

We shall now follow the unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) formalism to obtain a restricted high-spin open-shell functions as proposed in [34], [35]. In order to eliminate spin contamination in the UHF function f i, the following spin purity constraint is imposed on the spatial orbitals ... [Pg.114]

The UHF formalism becomes inconvenient for open-shell configurations of atoms or molecules with point-group symmetry. Unless specific restrictions are imposed, the self-consistent occupied orbitals fall into sets that are nearly but not quite transformable into each other by operations of the symmetry group. By imposing equivalence and symmetry restrictions, these sets become symmetry-adapted basis states for irreducible representations of the symmetry group. This makes it possible to construct symmetry-adapted /V-clcctron functions, as described in Section 4.4. The constraints in general invalidate the theorems of Brillouin and Koopmans. This restricted theory (RHF) is described in detail for atoms by Hartree [163] and by Froese Fischer [130],... [Pg.62]

Carsky, R, Hubac, I., and Staenamler, V., Correlation energies in open shell systems. Comparison ofCEPA, PNO—Cl, and perturbation treatments based on the restricted Roothaan-Hartree-Fock formalism, Theor. Chim. Acta 60, 445—450 (1982). [Pg.41]

I. Hubac and P. Carsky, Phys. Rev., All, 2392 (1980). Correlation Energy of Open-Shell Systems. Application of the Many-Body Rayleigh-Schrodinger Perturbation Theory in the Restricted Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Formalism. [Pg.131]


See other pages where Restricted open-shell formalism is mentioned: [Pg.132]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.132]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.166]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.272]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.2665]    [Pg.467]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.276]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.508 ]




SEARCH



Open shell

Restricted openings

© 2024 chempedia.info