Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Response function, detector, effects

We have shown that the radiant flux spectrum, as recorded by the spectrometer, is given by the convolution of the true radiant flux spectrum (as it would be recorded by a perfect instrument) with the spectrometer response function. In absorption spectroscopy, absorption lines typically appear superimposed upon a spectral background that is determined by the emission spectrum of the source, the spectral response of the detector, and other effects. Because we are interested in the properties of the absorbing molecules, it is necessary to correct for this background, or baseline as it is sometimes called. Furthermore, we shall see that the valuable physical-realizability constraints presented in Chapter 4 are easiest to apply when the data have this form. [Pg.54]

Now, the effective linear response function h(t) can be identified with g(t) as defined in Eqs. (25) and (29) h(t) = g(t). The primary sample response is the heterodyne diffraction efficiencyy (t) = Chet(t)- The instantaneous contribution of the temperature grating to the diffraction efficiency is expressed by the 5-function in g(t) [Eq. (25)]. After the sample, an unavoidable noise term e(t) is added. The continuous yff) is sampled by integrating with an ideal detector over time intervals At to finally obtain the time-discrete sequence y[n]. [Pg.43]

Effects of Detector Response Function. Two synthetic blends were made using three of the polystyrene latices (91 nm, 176 nm and 1091 nm). A sample of commercially available acrylic latex and one of butadiene latex were obtained and diluted with eluant. The two blends and two commercial samples were each analyzed using the FlowSizer with each of two different detector response functions. [Pg.263]

The effective resolution of a TCSPC experiment is characterised by its instrument response function (IRF). The IRF contains the pulse shape of the light source used, the temporal dispersion in the optical system, the transit time spread in the detector, and the timing jitter in the recording electronics. With ultrashort laser pulses, the IRF width at half-maximum for TCSPC is typically 25 to 60 ps for microchannel-plate (MCP) PMTs [4, 211, 547], and 150 to 250 ps for conventional short-time PMTs. The IRF width of inexpensive standard PMTs is normally... [Pg.22]

In some detectors a bump in the TCSPC instrument response function appears a few ns before the main peak. The size of the bump depends on the discriminator threshold. Normally the bump can be suppressed or reduced in size by increasing the discriminator threshold. The effect is probably caused by photoelectron emission from the first dynode. The corresponding pulses reach the anode prior to the photons from the cathode, and have a lower amplitude. Figure 6.20 shows an example for an H5773P-01 photosensor module. [Pg.234]

The zero cross level adjustment minimises the timing jitter induced by amplitude jitter of the detector pulses. The zero cross level is therefore often called walk adjust". In early TCSPC systems the walk adjust had an enormous influenee on the shape of the instrument response function (IRF). In newer, more advaneed systems the influence is smaller. The reason is probably that detectors with shorter single electron response are used and the discriminators in the newer CFDs are faster. Therefore, the effective slope of the zero cross transition is steeper, with a correspondingly smaller influence of the zero eross level. Figure 7.63 shows the IRF for an XP2020UR linear-focused PMT and an H5773-20 photosensor module for different zero cross levels. [Pg.321]

The perpendicular arrangement preserves more from the shape of the normal spectrum, which may be disadvantageous. The response function of the coaxially arranged HPGe-BGO detector system is simpler by being effective at suppressing the smooth continuum and in many cases the suppression is also better. [Pg.1649]

A transfer function, defined as the Laplace transfer of the impulse response of a linear system, can be obtained from the model. This can be very useful, because with a transfer function the influence of extra-column effects (detector, amplifier, filter) on the peak shape can be easily calculated. The transfer function is ... [Pg.70]


See other pages where Response function, detector, effects is mentioned: [Pg.76]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.635]    [Pg.656]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.285]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.495]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.453]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.310]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.171]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.952]    [Pg.993]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.686]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.465]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.85]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.430]    [Pg.11]   


SEARCH



Detector Responsivity

Detector function

Effective functionality

Effects function

Response Effectiveness

Response function, detector, effects distributions

Response functions

© 2024 chempedia.info